Insights into the complex interaction between hydrophilic nanoparticles and ionic surfactants at the liquid/air interface

Literature Information

Publication Date 2018-05-03
DOI 10.1039/C8CP01838C
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Jingyu Jin, Xiaoyan Li, Jiafeng Geng, Dengwei Jing


View Original

Abstract

Combinations of nanoparticles and surfactants have been widely employed in many industrial processes, i.e., boiling and condensation in heat transfer and hydraulic fracturing in shale oil and gas production, etc. However, the underlying mechanism for various phenomena resulting from the addition of nanoparticles into the surfactant solutions is still unclear. For instance, there are contradictory conclusions from the literature regarding the variations of surface tension upon the addition of nanoparticles into surfactant solutions. In this work, the dominating factors determining if the surface activity of the surfactant solution will increase or conversely decrease when adding certain kinds of nanoparticles have been investigated. Two typical hydrophilic nanoparticles, SiO2 and TiO2 with anionic or cationic surfactants, respectively, have been considered. The surface tension has been measured in a wide range of nanoparticle and surfactant concentrations. It was found that the surface tension of the ionic surfactant solution can be further reduced only if nanoparticles of the same charge were added. For instance, a system containing 0.25 CMC SDS and 1 wt% SiO2 behaves similar to a 0.34 CMC SDS-only solution. Interestingly, the observed synergistic effect is found to be more significant if the surfactant concentration is much lower than its CMC for a given nanoparticle content. Moreover, the effect is perfectly reversible. When the nanoparticles were separated from the system, the surface tension values recovered fully to that of the pure surfactants. If nanoparticles of opposite charge were added, however, the surface tension of the surfactant solution increased. Zeta potential measurement and centrifugal treatment have been employed to reveal the interplay between nanoparticles and surfactants and the adsorption behavior of their assemblies at the liquid/air interface. Based on the experimental outcomes, a possible physical mechanism was proposed. It was concluded that the electrostatic repulsion between surfactant molecules and nanoparticles should be the dominant factor responsible for the observed reversible synergistic effect. Our study is expected to contribute to a better understanding of the interfacial phenomenon in nanoparticle–surfactant complex systems.

Related Literature

Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein-mediated interaction of lipid A from different origin with phospholipid membranes Invited Lecture

Thomas Gutsmann, Andra B. Schromm, Michel H. J. Koch, S. Kusumoto, K. Fukase, M. Oikawa, Ulrich Seydel, Klaus Brandenburg

2000-09-25 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B004188M

Solid-state NMR study of mesoporous phosphoro-vanado-aluminas

Régis D. Gougeon, Philippe R. Bodart, Robin K. Harris, Dina M. Kolonia, Dimitris E. Petrakis, Philippos J. Pomonis

2000-10-30 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B005598K

n-Alkyl alcohols at the water/vapour and water/benzene interfaces: a study on phase transfer energies

Luca Frediani, Christian S. Pomelli, Jacopo Tomasi

2000-08-15 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B004330N

A molecular model for lipid-mediated interaction between proteins in membranes

Sylvio May, Avinoam Ben-Shaul

2000-08-22 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B003570J

The amphiphilic drug flufenamic acid can induce a hexagonal phase in DMPC: a solid state 31P- and 19F-NMR study

Stephan L. Grage, Dorit R. Gauger, Carsten Selle, Walter Pohle, Walter Richter, Anne S. Ulrich

2000-08-23 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B003902K

Continuum solvent effects on various isomers of bilirubin

Giuliano Alagona, Caterina Ghio, Susanna Monti

2000-09-01 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B004476H

You might also like

Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling 4-(2-Furylmethyl)thiomorpholine 1,1-dioxide (CAS: 79206-94-3)?

When handling 4-(2-Furylmethyl)thiomorpholine 1,1-dioxide (CAS: 79206-94-3), it ...

79206-94-34-(2-Furylmethyl)thi...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling 4-Chloro-N-[2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl]benzamide (CAS: 71320-77-9)?

When handling 4-Chloro-N-[2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl]benzamide (CAS: 71320-77-9), it...

71320-77-94-Chloro-N-[2-(4-mor...
Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 2-[2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethyl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate (CAS: 62921-74-8) be handled?

Waste containing this compound (CAS: 62921-74-8) should be handled according to ...

62921-74-82-[2-(2-Methoxyethox...
Compound Q&A

How should waste containing (S)-Methyl 2-amino-3-cyclohexylpropanoate be handled?

Waste containing (S)-Methyl 2-amino-3-cyclohexylpropanoate should be collected i...

40056-18-6(S)-Methyl 2-amino-3...
166882-70-85-({4-[(2S,4R)-4-Hyd...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to (2E)-3-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)acrylic acid (CAS: 7312-27-8) in synthesis?

There are several alternatives to (2E)-3-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)acrylic acid in syn...

7312-27-8(2E)-3-(3,4-Dichloro...
Compound Q&A

How should Ethyl 6-(2-nitrophenyl)imidazo[2,1-b][1,3]thiazole-3-carboxylate (CAS: 925437-84-9) be stored?

Ethyl 6-(2-nitrophenyl)imidazo[2,1-b][1,3]thiazole-3-carboxylate (CAS: 925437-84...

925437-84-9Ethyl 6-(2-nitrophen...
Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 2-(1,3-Thiazol-2-yl)ethanamine (CAS: 18453-07-1) be handled?

Waste containing 2-(1,3-Thiazol-2-yl)ethanamine (CAS: 18453-07-1) should be coll...

18453-07-12-(1,3-Thiazol-2-yl)...
Compound Q&A

How is Methyl 5-iodo-2-methylbenzoate (CAS: 103440-54-6) typically synthesized?

Methyl 5-iodo-2-methylbenzoate can be synthesized through the iodination of meth...

103440-54-6Methyl 5-iodo-2-meth...
Compound Q&A

How is 5-Chloro[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine (CAS: 1427399-34-5) typically synthesized?

5-Chloro[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine is commonly synthesized via the condensat...

1427399-34-55-Chloro[1,2,4]triaz...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.