Insights into the complex interaction between hydrophilic nanoparticles and ionic surfactants at the liquid/air interface
Literature Information
Jingyu Jin, Xiaoyan Li, Jiafeng Geng, Dengwei Jing
Combinations of nanoparticles and surfactants have been widely employed in many industrial processes, i.e., boiling and condensation in heat transfer and hydraulic fracturing in shale oil and gas production, etc. However, the underlying mechanism for various phenomena resulting from the addition of nanoparticles into the surfactant solutions is still unclear. For instance, there are contradictory conclusions from the literature regarding the variations of surface tension upon the addition of nanoparticles into surfactant solutions. In this work, the dominating factors determining if the surface activity of the surfactant solution will increase or conversely decrease when adding certain kinds of nanoparticles have been investigated. Two typical hydrophilic nanoparticles, SiO2 and TiO2 with anionic or cationic surfactants, respectively, have been considered. The surface tension has been measured in a wide range of nanoparticle and surfactant concentrations. It was found that the surface tension of the ionic surfactant solution can be further reduced only if nanoparticles of the same charge were added. For instance, a system containing 0.25 CMC SDS and 1 wt% SiO2 behaves similar to a 0.34 CMC SDS-only solution. Interestingly, the observed synergistic effect is found to be more significant if the surfactant concentration is much lower than its CMC for a given nanoparticle content. Moreover, the effect is perfectly reversible. When the nanoparticles were separated from the system, the surface tension values recovered fully to that of the pure surfactants. If nanoparticles of opposite charge were added, however, the surface tension of the surfactant solution increased. Zeta potential measurement and centrifugal treatment have been employed to reveal the interplay between nanoparticles and surfactants and the adsorption behavior of their assemblies at the liquid/air interface. Based on the experimental outcomes, a possible physical mechanism was proposed. It was concluded that the electrostatic repulsion between surfactant molecules and nanoparticles should be the dominant factor responsible for the observed reversible synergistic effect. Our study is expected to contribute to a better understanding of the interfacial phenomenon in nanoparticle–surfactant complex systems.
Related Literature
Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein-mediated interaction of lipid A from different origin with phospholipid membranes Invited Lecture
Thomas Gutsmann, Andra B. Schromm, Michel H. J. Koch, S. Kusumoto, K. Fukase, M. Oikawa, Ulrich Seydel, Klaus Brandenburg
DOI: 10.1039/B004188M
Friction and adhesion of mixed self-assembled monolayers studied by chemical force microscopy
DOI: 10.1039/A809994D
Solid-state NMR study of mesoporous phosphoro-vanado-aluminas
Régis D. Gougeon, Philippe R. Bodart, Robin K. Harris, Dina M. Kolonia, Dimitris E. Petrakis, Philippos J. Pomonis
DOI: 10.1039/B005598K
n-Alkyl alcohols at the water/vapour and water/benzene interfaces: a study on phase transfer energies
Luca Frediani, Christian S. Pomelli, Jacopo Tomasi
DOI: 10.1039/B004330N
A molecular model for lipid-mediated interaction between proteins in membranes
Sylvio May, Avinoam Ben-Shaul
DOI: 10.1039/B003570J
The amphiphilic drug flufenamic acid can induce a hexagonal phase in DMPC: a solid state 31P- and 19F-NMR study
Stephan L. Grage, Dorit R. Gauger, Carsten Selle, Walter Pohle, Walter Richter, Anne S. Ulrich
DOI: 10.1039/B003902K
Excess electrons in lithium–ethylamine solutions—density, electrical conductivity and EPR studies
DOI: 10.1039/A900683D
Continuum solvent effects on various isomers of bilirubin
Giuliano Alagona, Caterina Ghio, Susanna Monti
DOI: 10.1039/B004476H
You might also like
What precautions should be taken when handling 4-(2-Furylmethyl)thiomorpholine 1,1-dioxide (CAS: 79206-94-3)?
When handling 4-(2-Furylmethyl)thiomorpholine 1,1-dioxide (CAS: 79206-94-3), it ...
What precautions should be taken when handling 4-Chloro-N-[2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl]benzamide (CAS: 71320-77-9)?
When handling 4-Chloro-N-[2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl]benzamide (CAS: 71320-77-9), it...
How should waste containing 2-[2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethyl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate (CAS: 62921-74-8) be handled?
Waste containing this compound (CAS: 62921-74-8) should be handled according to ...
How should waste containing (S)-Methyl 2-amino-3-cyclohexylpropanoate be handled?
Waste containing (S)-Methyl 2-amino-3-cyclohexylpropanoate should be collected i...
How is 5-({4-[(2S,4R)-4-Hydroxy-2-methyltetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-yl]-2-thienyl}sulfanyl)-1-methyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-indol-2-one (CAS: 166882-70-8) typically synthesized?
This compound can be synthesized using a multi-step process involving the conjug...
Are there alternatives to (2E)-3-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)acrylic acid (CAS: 7312-27-8) in synthesis?
There are several alternatives to (2E)-3-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)acrylic acid in syn...
How should Ethyl 6-(2-nitrophenyl)imidazo[2,1-b][1,3]thiazole-3-carboxylate (CAS: 925437-84-9) be stored?
Ethyl 6-(2-nitrophenyl)imidazo[2,1-b][1,3]thiazole-3-carboxylate (CAS: 925437-84...
How should waste containing 2-(1,3-Thiazol-2-yl)ethanamine (CAS: 18453-07-1) be handled?
Waste containing 2-(1,3-Thiazol-2-yl)ethanamine (CAS: 18453-07-1) should be coll...
How is Methyl 5-iodo-2-methylbenzoate (CAS: 103440-54-6) typically synthesized?
Methyl 5-iodo-2-methylbenzoate can be synthesized through the iodination of meth...
How is 5-Chloro[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine (CAS: 1427399-34-5) typically synthesized?
5-Chloro[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine is commonly synthesized via the condensat...
Source Journal
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.














