Effect of energy per atom (E/n) on the Ar gas cluster ion beam (Ar-GCIB) and O2+ cosputter process

Literature Information

Publication Date 2019-03-27
DOI 10.1039/C8AN02452A
Impact Factor 4.616
Authors

Shin-Kung Wang, Hsun-Yun Chang, Yi-Hsuan Chu, Wei-Lun Kao, Chen-Yi Wu, Yi-Wei Lee, Yun-Wen You, Kuo-Jui Chu, Shu-Hang Hung


View Original

Abstract

Gas cluster ion beam (GCIB) is a promising technique for preserving molecular structures during ion sputtering and successfully profiling biological and soft materials. However, although GCIB yields lower damage accumulation compared with C60+ and monoatomic ion beams, the inevitable alteration of the chemical structure can introduce artifacts into the resulting depth profile. To enhance the ionization yield and further mask damage, a low-energy O2+ (200–500 V) cosputter can be applied. While the energy per atom (E/n) of GCIB is known to be an important factor influencing the sputter process, the manner through which E/n affects the GCIB-O2+ cosputter process remains unclear. In this study, poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was used as a model material to investigate the sputter process of 10–20 kV Ar1000–4000+ (E/n = 2.5–20 eV per atom) with and without O2+ cosputter at different energies and currents. Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) with Bi32+ as the primary ion was used to examine surfaces sputtered at different fluences. The sputter craters were also measured by alpha-step and atomic force microscopy in quantitative imaging mode. The SIMS results showed that the steady-state cannot be obtained with E/n values of less than 5 eV per atom due to damage accumulation using single GCIB sputtering. With a moderate E/n value of 5–15 eV per atom, the steady-state can be obtained, but the ∼50% decay in intensity indicated that damage cannot be masked completely despite the higher sputter yield. Furthermore, the surface Young's modulus decreased with increasing E/n, suggesting that depolymerization occurred. At an E/n value of 20 eV per atom, a failed profile was obtained with rapidly decreased sputter rate and secondary ion intensity due to the ion-induced crosslink. With O2+ cosputtering and a moderate E/n value, the oxidized species generated by O2+ enhanced the ionization yield, which led to a higher ion intensity at steady-state in general. Because higher kinetic energy or current density of O2+ led to a larger interaction volume and more structural damage that suppressed molecular ion intensity, the enhancement from O2+ was most apparent with low-energy–high-current (200 V, 80 μA cm−2) or high-energy–low-current (500 V, 5 μA cm−2) O2+ cosputtering with 0.5 μA cm−2 GCIBs. In these cases, little or no intensity drop was observed at the steady-state.

Related Literature

Regio- and stereoselective divergent cross-coupling of alkynes and disubstituted alkenes via photoredox cobalt dual catalysis

Yan-Lin Li, Kun Cui, Zheng-Yang Gu, Hu He

2023-10-28 Research Article

DOI: 10.1039/D3QO01281F

Visible-light-driven selective difluoroalkylation of α-CF3 alkenes to access CF2-containing gem-difluoroalkenes and trifluoromethylalkanes

Panpan Lei, Bingran Chen, Tonghui Zhang, Qinlin Chen, Liangming Xuan, Haifeng Wang, Qiongjiao Yan, Wei Wang, Jie Zeng

2023-11-23 Research Article

DOI: 10.1039/D3QO01551C

Transition-metal catalyzed reactions of diazo compounds and N,N-dialkylnitrosoamines

Yuan Chen, Rui-jun Peng, Xue-jing Zhang, Ming Yan

2023-11-21 Research Article

DOI: 10.1039/D3QO01607B

Organo-catalyzed C2,3–H aminochalcogenation of indoles with secondary (aliphatic) amines

Xiaoxiang Zhang, Chenrui Liu, Yingying Zhang, Fang Shen, Wanxing Wei, Zhuan Zhang, Taoyuan Liang

2023-10-11 Research Article

DOI: 10.1039/D3QO01457F

Theoretical and experimental investigation of Al3+ ion-suppressed phase-separation structures in rare-earth-doped high-phosphorus silica glasses

Jin-Jun Ren, Fan Wang, Dan-Ping Chen, Lu Deng, Chong-Yun Shao, Shi-Kai Wang

2023-12-20 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3CP04758J

A box-in-box supramolecular assembly for the highly selective recognition of natural, epigenetically and chemically modified cytosines in water

Shu-Qin Qin, Wei Xu, Qi-Qi Wang, Run-Yi Chen, De-Zhi Yang, Yang Lu

2023-11-23 Research Article

DOI: 10.1039/D3QO01649H

Regio- and stereoselective hydrosilylation of alkynes with alkoxysilanes for the synthesis of β-(Z) vinylsilanes catalyzed by a dirhodium(ii)/XantPhos complex

Liqun Yang, Wenkui Lu, Xiaoyu Wu, Yan Lu, Xiaomin Xie, Zhaoguo Zhang

2023-11-27 Research Article

DOI: 10.1039/D3QO01725G

Photoredox-catalyzed difunctionalization of alkenes with oxime esters and NH-sulfoximines

Hao-Cong Li, Guan-Nan Li, Hao-Sen Wang, Xiao-Lan Chen, Bing Yu

2023-11-21 Research Article

DOI: 10.1039/D3QO01575K

Repercussions of multi-electron uptake by a twistacene: a reduction-induced double dehydrogenative annulation

Matthew Pennachio, Zheng Wei, Robert G. Clevenger, Kathleen V. Kilway, Alexandra Tsybizova, Renana Gershoni-Poranne, Marina A. Petrukhina

2023-09-22 Research Article

DOI: 10.1039/D3QO01282D

You might also like

Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for N-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-2-pyridinamine (CAS: 52818-63-0)?

N-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-2-pyridinamine (CAS: 52818-63-0) is increasingly being used ...

52818-63-0N-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling Ethyl 4-(2-chlorophenyl)-1,3-thiazole-2-carboxylate (CAS: 1050507-06-6)?

When handling Ethyl 4-(2-chlorophenyl)-1,3-thiazole-2-carboxylate, appropriate p...

1050507-06-6Ethyl 4-(2-chlorophe...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to diethyldiselane (CAS: 628-39-7)?

Diethyldiselane (CAS: 628-39-7) is classified under the Globally Harmonized Syst...

628-39-7Diethyldiselane
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for oxocopper (CAS: 12053-18-8)?

The market for oxocopper (CAS: 12053-18-8) is primarily driven by its use in cat...

12053-18-8oxocopper; oxo-(oxoc...
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for 5-{[(2-Methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}-5-azaspiro[2.4]heptane-7-carboxylic acid?

The market for 5-{[(2-Methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}-5-azaspiro[2.4]heptane-7-c...

1268519-54-55-{[(2-Methyl-2-prop...
Compound Q&A

What is 2-(1-Pyrrolidinyl)-4-pyridinamine (CAS: 35981-63-6)?

2-(1-Pyrrolidinyl)-4-pyridinamine is a chemical compound with the CAS number 359...

35981-63-62-(1-Pyrrolidinyl)-4...
Compound Q&A

What are the physical and chemical properties of 2-(3-Pyridinyl)-1-azabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (CAS: 91556-75-1)?

2-(3-Pyridinyl)-1-azabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (CAS: 91556-75-1) is a crystalline sol...

91556-75-12-(3-Pyridinyl)-1-az...
Compound Q&A

How is (S)-Alpha-allyl-proline hydrochloride (CAS: 129704-91-2) typically synthesized?

(S)-Alpha-allyl-proline hydrochloride is usually synthesized via a Wittig reacti...

129704-91-2(S)-Alpha-allyl-prol...
Compound Q&A

What is 3-Methyl-1,2-oxazole-5-carboxylic acid (CAS: 4857-42-5)?

3-Methyl-1,2-oxazole-5-carboxylic acid (CAS: 4857-42-5) is an organic compound w...

4857-42-53-Methyl-1,2-oxazole...
Compound Q&A

How is Lys-SMCC-DM1 (CAS: 1281816-04-3) typically synthesized?

Lys-SMCC-DM1 is synthesized via a multi-step process involving the coupling of S...

1281816-04-3Lys-SMCC-DM1

Source Journal

Analyst

Analyst
CiteScore: 7.8
Self-citation Rate: 5.6%
Articles per Year: 653

Analyst publishes analytical and bioanalytical research that reports premier fundamental discoveries and inventions, and the applications of those discoveries, unconfined by traditional discipline barriers.

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.