Tracing the reactivity of single atom alloys for ethanol dehydrogenation using ab initio simulations

Literature Information

Publication Date 2021-11-23
DOI 10.1039/D1RE00396H
Impact Factor 4.239
Authors

Jayendran Iyer, Fatima Jalid, Tuhin S. Khan, M. Ali Haider


View Original

Abstract

An ab initio micro-kinetic model (MKM) is constructed to understand the reactivity trend of the single atom alloys (SAAs) of Cu and Au for non-oxidative dehydrogenation (NODH) of ethanol to produce acetaldehyde. The model utilizes well-known scaling relations between the transition state (TS) and final state (FS) structures to calculate product formation rates. The turnover frequencies (TOFs) of the product are plotted with respect to the two descriptors: carbon and oxygen binding energies on the catalyst surface. The resulting MKM has predicted no significant change in the activity of NODH on the NiCu SAA (TOF ∼ 10−4 s−1) as compared to that on Cu (111) (TOF ∼ 10−4 s−1). This stands in contrast to the experimental reports. A similar erroneous trend is calculated for NiAu, PtCu and PdCu SAAs using the scaling MKM. In parallel, an attempt is made to utilize a machine learning (ML) approach to augment descriptor prediction for the Cu based SAAs in the scaling MKM; however, the resulting trend remained similar and contradictory to experiments. The underlying reason for this discrepancy is unraveled in density functional theory (DFT) calculations of the NODH reaction over SAA surfaces, wherein a clear departure from scaling relations is observed, resulting in significant reduction in the activation barriers of the initial O–H or α-C–H activation steps in ethanol. Following which, a full-DFT parameterized non-scaling MKM is considered essential to estimate the reactivity trend of SAAs. Consistent with the experimental reports, the non-scaling ab initio MKM predicted the trend of the Cu based alloys as NiCu > PtCu ∼ PdCu > Cu at 400 K and Au based alloy as NiAu > Au at 500 K. The non-scaling MKM has further revealed the dominant mechanistic route for the NODH reaction via the initial O–H or α-C–H activation in ethanol. Except for PtCu, all other prominent SAAs (NiCu, PdCu and NiAu) are expected to follow the initial O–H scission route to produce acetaldehyde, while in the case of PtCu, both the mechanistic routes are likely to compete.

Related Literature

Modelling photophysical properties of metal–organic frameworks: a density functional theory based approach

Liam Wilbraham, François-Xavier Coudert, Ilaria Ciofini

2016-08-16 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP04056J

In situ S-K XANES study of polymer electrolyte fuel cells: changes in the chemical states of sulfonic groups depending on humidity

Kazuhisa Isegawa, Tetsuo Nagami, Shinji Jomori, Masaaki Yoshida, Hiroshi Kondoh

2016-08-26 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP04052G

Feynman force components: basis for a solution to the covalent vs. ionic dilemma

Justyna Dominikowska, Mirosław Jabłoński, Marcin Palusiak

2016-08-26 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP03774G

Computational insights into the destabilization of α-helical conformations formed by leucine zipper peptides in response to temperature

Xiejun Xu, Xingqing Xiao, Shouhong Xu, Honglai Liu

2016-08-16 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP05145F

Strong 1D localization and highly anisotropic electron–hole masses in heavy-halogen functionalized graphenes

Lukas Eugen Marsoner Steinkasserer, Alessandra Zarantonello, Beate Paulus

2016-09-05 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP05188J

Probing ligand-induced modulation of metallic states in small gold nanoparticles using conduction electron spin resonance

Anthony Cirri, Alexey Silakov, Lasse Jensen, Benjamin J. Lear

2016-08-25 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP02205G

Do group 1 metal salts form deep eutectic solvents?

A. P. Abbott, C. D'Agostino, S. J. Davis, L. F. Gladden, M. D. Mantle

2016-08-26 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP05880A

Calculation of Raman parameters of real-size zigzag (n, 0) single-walled carbon nanotubes using finite-size models

Teobald Kupka, Michal Stachów, Leszek Stobiński, Jakub Kaminský

2016-08-11 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP04100K

Front cover

Cover

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP90219G

Effect of chain microstructure on self-assembly and emulsification of amphiphilic poly(acrylic acid)-polystyrene copolymers

Ye Zhu, Chenglin Yi, Qiong Hu, Wei Wei, Xiaoya Liu

2016-08-30 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP04978H

You might also like

Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling lithium chloride hydrate (1:1:1) (CAS: 16712-20-2)?

When handling lithium chloride hydrate (1:1:1) (CAS: 16712-20-2), it is importan...

16712-20-2Lithium chloride hyd...
Compound Q&A

Is 4-(4H-1,2,4-Triazol-4-yl)piperidine (CAS: 690261-92-8) safe?

4-(4H-1,2,4-Triazol-4-yl)piperidine is generally considered safe for use in phar...

690261-92-84-(4H-1,2,4-Triazol-...
Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 1,3-Thiazole-2-carboxamide (CAS: 16733-85-0) be handled?

Waste containing 1,3-Thiazole-2-carboxamide (CAS: 16733-85-0) should be collecte...

16733-85-01,3-Thiazole-2-carbo...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 5-(Difluoromethyl)-2-fluorobenzonitrile (CAS: 934175-58-3)?

5-(Difluoromethyl)-2-fluorobenzonitrile (CAS: 934175-58-3) is subject to regulat...

934175-58-35-(Difluoromethyl)-2...
Compound Q&A

How is Methyl 3-acetamido-2-thiophenecarboxylate (CAS: 22288-79-5) typically synthesized?

Methyl 3-acetamido-2-thiophenecarboxylate can be synthesized by the reaction of ...

22288-79-5Methyl 3-acetamido-2...
Compound Q&A

What is 4-Isoquinolinecarbonitrile (CAS: 34846-65-6)?

4-Isoquinolinecarbonitrile is a chemical compound with the CAS number 34846-65-6...

34846-65-64-Isoquinolinecarbon...
Compound Q&A

How should Methyl 1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (CAS: 877309-59-6) be stored?

Store Methyl 1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (CAS: 877309-59-6) in a cool, dry p...

877309-59-6Methyl 1H-1,2,3-tria...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 6-Bromo[1,3]thiazolo[5,4-b]pyridin-2-amine (CAS: 1160791-13-8)?

6-Bromo[1,3]thiazolo[5,4-b]pyridin-2-amine (CAS: 1160791-13-8) is subject to the...

1160791-13-86-Bromo[1,3]thiazolo...
Compound Q&A

Is (2S,3S)-2-Ammonio-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-hydroxypropanoate (CAS: 23651-95-8) safe?

(2S,3S)-2-Ammonio-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-hydroxypropanoate (CAS: 23651-95-8) ...

23651-95-8(2S,3S)-2-Ammonio-3-...
Compound Q&A

What are the physical and chemical properties of 7-bromo-3-methyl-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-4-one (CAS: 1293987-84-4)?

7-Bromo-3-methyl-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-4-one is a solid with a crystalline form....

1293987-84-47-bromo-3-methyl-3,4...

Source Journal

Reaction Chemistry & Engineering

Reaction Chemistry & Engineering
CiteScore: 0
Self-citation Rate: 8.8%
Articles per Year: 284

Reaction Chemistry & Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal reporting cutting-edge research focused on enhancing the understanding and efficiency of reactions. Reaction engineering leverages the interface where fundamental molecular chemistry meets chemical engineering and technology. Challenges in chemistry can be overcome by the application of new technologies, while engineers may find improved solutions for process development from the latest developments in reaction chemistry. Reaction Chemistry & Engineering is a unique forum for researchers whose interests span the broad areas of chemical engineering and chemical sciences to come together in solving problems of importance to wider society. All papers should be written to be approachable by readers across the engineering and chemical sciences. Papers that consider multiple scales, from the laboratory up to and including plant scale, are particularly encouraged.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.