Full-dimensional analytical potential energy surface describing the gas-phase Cl + C2H6 reaction and kinetics study of rate constants and kinetic isotope effects

Literature Information

Publication Date 2018-01-03
DOI 10.1039/C7CP07592H
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Cipriano Rangel, Joaquin Espinosa-Garcia


View Original

Abstract

Within the Born–Oppenheimer approximation a full-dimensional analytical potential energy surface, PES-2017, was developed for the gas-phase hydrogen abstraction reaction between the chlorine atom and ethane, which is a nine body system. This surface presents a valence-bond/molecular mechanics functional form dependent on 60 parameters and is fitted to high-level ab initio calculations. This reaction presents little exothermicity, −2.30 kcal mol−1, with a low height barrier, 2.44 kcal mol−1, and intermediate complexes in the entrance and exit channels. We found that the energetic description was strongly dependent on the ab initio level used and it presented a very flat topology in the entrance channel, which represents a theoretical challenge in the fitting process. In general, PES-2017 reproduces the ab initio information used as input, which is merely a test of self-consistency. As a first test of the quality of the PES-2017, a theoretical kinetics study was performed in the temperature range 200–1400 K using two approaches, i.e. the variational transition-state theory and quasi-classical trajectory calculations, with spin–orbit effects. The rate constants show reasonable agreement with experiments in the whole temperature range, with the largest differences at the lowest temperatures, and this behaviour agrees with previous theoretical studies, thus indicating the inherent difficulties in the theoretical simulation of the kinetics of the title reaction. Different sources of error were analysed, such as the limitations of the PES and theoretical methods, recrossing effects, and the tunnelling effect, which is negligible in this reaction, and the manner in which the spin–orbit effects were included in this non-relativistic study. We found that the variation of spin–orbit coupling along the reaction path, and the influence of the reactivity of the excited Cl(2P1/2) state, have relative importance, but do not explain the whole discrepancy. Finally, the activation energy and the kinetics isotope effects reproduce the experimental information.

Related Literature

Seeking minimum entropy production for a tree-like flow-field in a fuel cell

Marco Sauermoser, Signe Kjelstrup, Bruno G. Pollet, Eirik G. Flekkøy

2020-03-18 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C9CP05394H

Graphyne-anchored single Fe atoms as efficient CO oxidation catalysts as predicted by DFT calculations

Si Wu, Yuan Yuan, Hui Mao, Baotao Kang

2020-02-20 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP00178C

Interaction of positronium with dissolved oxygen in liquids‡

P. S. Stepanov, F. A. Selim, A. V. Bokov, O. V. Ilyukhina, G. Duplâtre

2020-01-29 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C9CP06105C

Adsorption of H2 on amorphous solid water studied with molecular dynamics simulations

Germán Molpeceres, Johannes Kästner

2020-03-19 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP00250J

Sodium-assisted passivation of grain boundaries and defects in Cu2ZnSnSe4 thin films

Juran Kim, Gee Yeong Kim, Trang Thi Thu Nguyen, Seokhyun Yoon, Yoon-Koo Kim, Seung-Yong Lee, Miyoung Kim, Dae-Hyung Cho, Yong-Duck Chung, Je-Ho Lee, Maeng-Je Seong, William Jo

2020-03-11 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C9CP06537G

Intercalation, decomposition, entrapment – a new route to graphene nanobubbles

Adriana Alieva, Cinzia Casiraghi

2020-03-17 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP00592D

Structural interpretation of the energetic performances of a pure silica LTA-type zeolite

Giorgia Confalonieri, Rossella Arletti, Simona Quartieri, Giovanna Vezzalini

2020-02-11 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C9CP06760D

Probing molecular interactions of PEGylated chitosan in aqueous solutions using a surface force apparatus

Li Xiang, Lu Gong, Jiawen Zhang, Ling Zhang, Wenjihao Hu, Wenda Wang, Qingye Lu, Hongbo Zeng

2019-07-22 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C9CP03189H

You might also like

Compound Q&A

Is 6-(3-Fluorophenyl)picolinic acid (CAS: 887982-40-3) safe?

6-(3-Fluorophenyl)picolinic acid is generally considered safe for laboratory use...

887982-40-36-(3-Fluorophenyl)pi...
Compound Q&A

What industries use (3R)-3-Pyrrolidinol (CAS: 2799-21-5)?

(3R)-3-Pyrrolidinol is used in the pharmaceutical industry as a precursor for dr...

2799-21-5(3R)-3-Pyrrolidinol
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling (4R,5R)-4,5-Diethoxycarbonyl-2,2-dimethyldioxolane (CAS: 59779-75-8)?

When handling (4R,5R)-4,5-Diethoxycarbonyl-2,2-dimethyldioxolane (CAS: 59779-75-...

59779-75-8(4R,5R)-4,5-Diethoxy...
Compound Q&A

How is 1-(6-Chloroimidazo[1,2-b]pyridazin-3-yl)ethanone (CAS: 90734-71-7) typically synthesized?

1-(6-Chloroimidazo[1,2-b]pyridazin-3-yl)ethanone is often synthesized via a mult...

90734-71-71-(6-Chloroimidazo[1...
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for N-Ethyl-3,4-dimethylbenzylamine (CAS: 39180-83-1)?

The market for N-Ethyl-3,4-dimethylbenzylamine (CAS: 39180-83-1) remains steady,...

39180-83-1N-Ethyl-3,4-dimethyl...
Compound Q&A

What is Tert-butyl 3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)azetidine-1-carboxylate (CAS: 1019008-21-9)?

Tert-butyl 3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)azetidine-1-carboxylate is a chemical compound wit...

1019008-21-9Tert-butyl 3-(pyrrol...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 1-Bromo-3-chloro-2,4-dimethoxybenzene (CAS: 1228956-93-1)?

1-Bromo-3-chloro-2,4-dimethoxybenzene (CAS: 1228956-93-1) falls under the classi...

1228956-93-11-Bromo-3-chloro-2,4...
Compound Q&A

Is 8-Bromo-2-methyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-1(2H)-one (CAS: 1368622-07-4) safe?

The safety of 8-Bromo-2-methyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-1(2H)-one (CAS: 1368622-07...

1368622-07-48-Bromo-2-methyl-3,4...
Compound Q&A

Is Benzyl [(3S)-2,6-dioxo-3-piperidinyl]carbamate (CAS: 22785-43-9) safe?

Benzyl [(3S)-2,6-dioxo-3-piperidinyl]carbamate is generally safe when handled wi...

22785-43-9Benzyl [(3S)-2,6-dio...
Compound Q&A

How should 1-{[4-(4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)phenyl]sulfonyl}pyrrolidine (CAS: 928657-21-0) be stored?

1-{[4-(4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)phenyl]sulfonyl}pyrrolidine s...

928657-21-01-{[4-(4,4,5,5-Tetra...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.