Higher-order split operator schemes for solving the Schrödinger equation in the time-dependent wave packet method: applications to triatomic reactive scattering calculations

Literature Information

Publication Date 2012-01-10
DOI 10.1039/C1CP22790D
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Weitao Yang


View Original

Abstract

The efficiency of the numerical propagators for solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation in the wave packet approach to reactive scattering is of vital importance. In this Perspective, we first briefly review the propagators used in quantum reactive scattering calculations and their applications to triatomic reactions. Then we present a detailed comparison of about thirty higher-order split operator propagators for solving the Schrödinger equation with their applications to the wave packet evolution within a one-dimensional Morse potential, and the total reaction probability calculations for the H + HD, H + NH, H + O2, and F + HD reactions. These four triatomic reactions have quite different dynamic characteristics and thus provide a comprehensive picture of the relative advantages of these higher-order propagation methods for describing reactive scattering dynamics. Our calculations reveal that the most often used second-order split operator method is typically more efficient for a direct reaction, particularly for those involving flat potential energy surfaces. However, the optimal higher-order split operator methods are more suitable for a reaction with resonances and intermediate complexes or a reaction experiencing potential energy surface with fluctuations of considerable amplitude. Three 4th-order and one 6th-order split operator methods, which are most efficient for solving reactive scattering in various conditions among the tested ones, are recommended for general applications. In addition, a brief discussion on the relative performance between the Chebyshev real wave packet method and the split operator method is given. The results in this Perspective are expected to stimulate more applications of (high-order) split operators to the quantum reactive scattering calculation and other related problems.

Related Literature

Surface plasmon resonance biosensor chips integrated with MoS2–MoO3 hybrid microflowers for rapid CFP-10 tuberculosis detection

Ahmad Nuruddin, Muhammad Iqbal, Hutomo Suryo Wasisto

2023-11-16 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3TB01327H

Mangifera indica stone-assisted layered double hydroxide biocomposites: efficient contenders for reactive dye adsorption from aqueous sources

Marrium Saeed, Urooj Kamran, Amina Khan, Md Irfanul Haque Siddiqui, Hasan Jamal, Haq Nawaz Bhatti

2023-11-27 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ04133F

Novel solar-light-driven Z-scheme BiOCl@WS2 nanocomposite photocatalysts for the photocatalytic removal of organic pollutants

Chang-Mou Wu, Kebena Gebeyehu Motora, Pankaj Koinkar, Akihiro Furube

2023-11-06 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ04410F

A glutathione-responsive PEGylated nanogel with doxorubicin-conjugation for cancer therapy

Qiang Wang, Zhen Pei, Zhipeng He, Wei Guo, Lingna Han

2023-11-21 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3TB01731A

Front cover

2023-11-22 Cover

DOI: 10.1039/D3TB90219F

Bromination of organic spacer impacts on the structural arrangement, phase transitions, and optical and electrical properties of a hybrid halide compound:[(CH3)3N(CH2)3Br]2PdBr4

Mohamed Saadi, Imen Dakhlaoui, Fadhel Hajlaoui, Nidhal Drissi, Mustapha Zighrioui, Fethi Jomni, Nathalie Audebrand, Marie Cordier

2023-11-24 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ04819E

Physically cross-linked organo-hydrogels for friction interfaces in joint replacements: design, evaluation and potential clinical applications

Zheng Li, Jia Wan, Wanbo Zhu, Yingjie Wang, Yuan Chen, Baoliang Lu, Junchen Zhu, Chen Zhu, Xianzuo Zhang

2023-11-16 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3TB01830J

You might also like

Compound Q&A

Is 6-(3-Fluorophenyl)picolinic acid (CAS: 887982-40-3) safe?

6-(3-Fluorophenyl)picolinic acid is generally considered safe for laboratory use...

887982-40-36-(3-Fluorophenyl)pi...
Compound Q&A

What industries use (3R)-3-Pyrrolidinol (CAS: 2799-21-5)?

(3R)-3-Pyrrolidinol is used in the pharmaceutical industry as a precursor for dr...

2799-21-5(3R)-3-Pyrrolidinol
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling (4R,5R)-4,5-Diethoxycarbonyl-2,2-dimethyldioxolane (CAS: 59779-75-8)?

When handling (4R,5R)-4,5-Diethoxycarbonyl-2,2-dimethyldioxolane (CAS: 59779-75-...

59779-75-8(4R,5R)-4,5-Diethoxy...
Compound Q&A

How is 1-(6-Chloroimidazo[1,2-b]pyridazin-3-yl)ethanone (CAS: 90734-71-7) typically synthesized?

1-(6-Chloroimidazo[1,2-b]pyridazin-3-yl)ethanone is often synthesized via a mult...

90734-71-71-(6-Chloroimidazo[1...
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for N-Ethyl-3,4-dimethylbenzylamine (CAS: 39180-83-1)?

The market for N-Ethyl-3,4-dimethylbenzylamine (CAS: 39180-83-1) remains steady,...

39180-83-1N-Ethyl-3,4-dimethyl...
Compound Q&A

What is Tert-butyl 3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)azetidine-1-carboxylate (CAS: 1019008-21-9)?

Tert-butyl 3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)azetidine-1-carboxylate is a chemical compound wit...

1019008-21-9Tert-butyl 3-(pyrrol...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 1-Bromo-3-chloro-2,4-dimethoxybenzene (CAS: 1228956-93-1)?

1-Bromo-3-chloro-2,4-dimethoxybenzene (CAS: 1228956-93-1) falls under the classi...

1228956-93-11-Bromo-3-chloro-2,4...
Compound Q&A

Is 8-Bromo-2-methyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-1(2H)-one (CAS: 1368622-07-4) safe?

The safety of 8-Bromo-2-methyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-1(2H)-one (CAS: 1368622-07...

1368622-07-48-Bromo-2-methyl-3,4...
Compound Q&A

Is Benzyl [(3S)-2,6-dioxo-3-piperidinyl]carbamate (CAS: 22785-43-9) safe?

Benzyl [(3S)-2,6-dioxo-3-piperidinyl]carbamate is generally safe when handled wi...

22785-43-9Benzyl [(3S)-2,6-dio...
Compound Q&A

How should 1-{[4-(4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)phenyl]sulfonyl}pyrrolidine (CAS: 928657-21-0) be stored?

1-{[4-(4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)phenyl]sulfonyl}pyrrolidine s...

928657-21-01-{[4-(4,4,5,5-Tetra...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.