Like likes like: counterion-mediated attraction in macroionic and colloidal interaction

Literature Information

Publication Date 2010-07-09
DOI 10.1039/C000729C
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors


View Original

Abstract

The colloidal and macroionic interaction is discussed within the mean-field approach. Bound pairs of latex particles are photographed at a low particle volume fraction of 10−4. The effective pair-potential obtained therefrom has an attractive tail for highly charged samples, while no attraction is detected for a low-charge sample. This attraction also manifests itself in the reversible aggregation of polystyrene sulfonate or DNA double strands by multivalent counterions. It is furthermore found in intra-macroionic interaction, affecting the conformation of flexible macroions. The reason why the DLVO theory predicts only repulsion is discussed. The Fowler-Guggenheim-McQaurrie analysis of the Debye–Hückel theory indicates that electrostatic Helmholtz free energy Fel is generally not equal to Gibbs free energy Gel. The difference (Gel − Fel)/V (V: system volume) corresponds to the electrostatic osmotic pressure pel, which increases with increasing charge number. This consideration hints that (Gel − Fel) might not be negligible for highly charged macroions and colloidal particles. On the other hand, the DLVO approach is based on the assumption of Gel = Fel. Using a mean-field approach, Sogami showed that the pair-potential is purely repulsive at the level of Fel, in conformity with the DLVO theory, whereas it contains a short-range repulsion and a long-range attraction at the level of Gel. The prevailing view that the interparticle interaction is purely repulsive in the mean-field approach, is not necessarily correct: it originates from the assumption that Gel = Fel. The DLVO theory is correct for low charge samples while the like-likes-like attraction appears for highly charged ones.

Related Literature

Novel cofacial oxidative coupling reaction of phosphinine in the presence of Cu(i) and ClO4−

Takahiko Kojima, Yoshitaka Ishioka, Yoshihisa Matsuda

2004-01-16 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B308892H

Alkoxyphenyl-substituted polyfluorene: a stable blue-light-emitting polymer with good solution processability

Ji-Hoon Lee, Do-Hoon Hwang

2003-10-11 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B309006J

Prediction of formation constants of metal–ammonia complexes in aqueous solution using density functional theory calculations

Robert D. Hancock, Libero J. Bartolotti

2004-01-27 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B312518C

Structure and magnetism of a new pyrazolate bridged iron(II) spin crossover complex displaying a single HS–HS to LS–LS transition

Ben A. Leita, Boujemaa Moubaraki, Keith S. Murray, Jonathan P. Smith, John D. Cashion

2003-11-20 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B311818E

Cooperative C–F⋯Si interaction in optically active helical polysilanes

Sun-Young Kim, Giseop Kwak, Yusuke Kawakami

2004-01-27 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B314723A

A novel water-soluble and self-doped conducting polyaniline graft copolymer

Woo Jin Bae, Keon Hyeong Kim, Yun Heum Park, Won Ho Jo

2003-10-09 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B309346H

Template-free synthesis of single-crystalline cadmium nanotubes

Pingàn Hu, Yunqi Liu, Lei Fu, Lingchao Cao, Daoben Zhu

2004-02-04 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B312708G

You might also like

Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 2-Ethyl-4-Methyl-1H-Imidazole-5-Carbaldehyde (CAS: 88634-80-4) be handled?

Waste containing 2-Ethyl-4-Methyl-1H-Imidazole-5-Carbaldehyde (CAS: 88634-80-4) ...

88634-80-42-Ethyl-4-Methyl-1H-...
Compound Q&A

What industries use Triethoxy(octyl)silane (CAS: 1385031-14-0)?

Triethoxy(octyl)silane (CAS: 1385031-14-0) is widely used in the pharmaceuticals...

1385031-14-0Triethoxy(octyl)sila...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to 3-iodo-7-nitro-1H-indazole (CAS: 864724-64-1) in synthesis?

Several alternatives to 3-iodo-7-nitro-1H-indazole (CAS: 864724-64-1) exist in t...

864724-64-13-iodo-7-nitro-1H-in...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to Benzene, bis[(trimethoxysilyl)ethyl] (CAS: 266317-71-9) in synthesis?

Yes, there are alternatives to Benzene, bis[(trimethoxysilyl)ethyl] (CAS: 266317...

266317-71-9Benzene, bis[(trimet...
Compound Q&A

Is Isothiazole-3-carbonitrile (CAS: 1452-17-1) safe?

Isothiazole-3-carbonitrile (CAS: 1452-17-1) is generally considered safe when us...

1452-17-1Isothiazole-3-carbon...
Compound Q&A

Is (3-Chlorophenyl)methanol (CAS: 873-63-2) safe?

(3-Chlorophenyl)methanol (CAS: 873-63-2) is considered low to moderately toxic. ...

873-63-2(3-Chlorophenyl)meth...
Compound Q&A

How is (2S,3S)-2-Hydroxy-3-({[(2-methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}amino)-3-(2-naphthyl)propanoic acid (CAS: 959583-98-3) typically synthesized?

(2S,3S)-2-Hydroxy-3-({[(2-methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}amino)-3-(2-naphthyl)pr...

959583-98-3(2S,3S)-2-Hydroxy-3-...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling Methyl 2-(bromomethyl)-5-methoxybenzoate (CAS: 788081-99-2)?

Proper handling of methyl 2-(bromomethyl)-5-methoxybenzoate requires the use of ...

788081-99-2Methyl 2-(bromomethy...
Compound Q&A

What is 6,8-Dibromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-2-carboxylic acid (CAS: 904805-36-3)?

6,8-Dibromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-2-carboxylic acid (CAS: 904805-36-3) is an aro...

904805-36-36,8-Dibromoimidazo[1...
Compound Q&A

Is 3-Amino-5-bromo-2-pyridinecarbonitrile (CAS: 573675-27-1) safe?

3-Amino-5-bromo-2-pyridinecarbonitrile is considered safe when handled under pro...

573675-27-13-Amino-5-bromo-2-py...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.