Design of millidevices to expedite apparent solubility measurements

Literature Information

Publication Date 2022-06-17
DOI 10.1039/D2RE00022A
Impact Factor 4.239
Authors

Jean-Luc Beulay, Eric Valery, Peter Satzer


View Original

Abstract

Protein solubility is a critical attribute in the development and production of monoclonal antibodies. Available solubility data refer to pure solutes which do not consider solvents and impurities which have a significant effect on solubility. Thus, solubility curves need to be determined experimentally. Previously established methods to determine the apparent solubility of proteins are based on manual assays which are time-consuming and labor-intensive. We present the design of simple and adaptable millidevices for fast solubility curve determination. Such a device in the form of a tubular reactor was manufactured from polymethylmethacrylate by laser cutting. The reactors had multiple injection points for the precipitant that allowed a controlled and precise addition of the precipitating agent at different concentrations. Hence, antibodies could be directly harvested at different concentrations of precipitating agents. The simple and flexible design allowed the number of pumps required to be reduced to only one for each solution and the distribution of the precipitating agent at different concentrations without valves. To demonstrate the wide applicability of the prototype in determining solubility curves, we used 2 industrially relevant precipitating agents, PEG6000 and ZnCl2, to measure the apparent solubilities of 4 antibodies and CaCl2 to measure the apparent solubility curves for dsDNA. In all cases, the data obtained were consistent between the device and manual assays with good reproducibility. This millidevice can be used for fast characterization of protein solutions such as solubility, degradation or stability of the antibodies under different conditions.

Related Literature

Binding of divalent cations to acetate: molecular simulations guided by Raman spectroscopy

Denilson Mendes de Oliveira, Samual R. Zukowski, Vladimir Palivec, Hector Martinez-Seara, Dor Ben-Amotz, Pavel Jungwirth

2020-10-10 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP02987D

Brushes and lamellar mesophases of comb-shaped (co)polymers: a self-consistent field theory

Ivan V. Mikhailov, Ekaterina B. Zhulina

2020-10-13 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP02954H

The unfolding transition state of ubiquitin with charged residues has higher energy than that with hydrophobic residues

Tathagata Nandi, Amogh Desai, Sri Rama Koti Ainavarapu

2020-09-09 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP03876H

An ab initio investigation of the adsorption properties of water on binary AlSi clusters

Alexandre C. R. Gomes, Tiago M. de Souza, Juarez L. F. Da Silva, Breno R. L. Galvão

2020-10-02 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP02974B

Energetics of non-heme iron reactivity: can ab initio calculations provide the right answer?

Milica Feldt, Carlos Martín-Fernández, Jeremy N. Harvey

2020-10-12 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP04401F

Accurate elemental boiling points from first principles

Odile R. Smits

2020-10-12 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP02884C

Unraveling the regioselectivity of odd electron halogen bond formation using electrophilicity index and chemical hardness parameters

Prasanta Bandyopadhyay, Soumyadip Ray, Md. Motin Seikh

2019-11-15 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C9CP05374C

Charge regulation of colloidal particles in aqueous solutions

Amin Bakhshandeh, Derek Frydel, Yan Levin

2020-09-15 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP03633A

Selective bond breaking of halothane induced by electron transfer in potassium collisions

A. I. Lozano, L. S. Maioli, B. Pamplona, M. Mendes, F. Ferreira da Silva, F. Kossoski, D. Süβ, M. H. F. Bettega, G. García, P. Limão-Vieira

2020-09-24 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP02570D

Achieving high hydrogen evolution reaction activity of a Mo2C monolayer

Tong Yu, Jiani Ma, Shoutao Zhang

2020-11-03 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP05053A

You might also like

Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 2-Ethyl-4-Methyl-1H-Imidazole-5-Carbaldehyde (CAS: 88634-80-4) be handled?

Waste containing 2-Ethyl-4-Methyl-1H-Imidazole-5-Carbaldehyde (CAS: 88634-80-4) ...

88634-80-42-Ethyl-4-Methyl-1H-...
Compound Q&A

What industries use Triethoxy(octyl)silane (CAS: 1385031-14-0)?

Triethoxy(octyl)silane (CAS: 1385031-14-0) is widely used in the pharmaceuticals...

1385031-14-0Triethoxy(octyl)sila...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to 3-iodo-7-nitro-1H-indazole (CAS: 864724-64-1) in synthesis?

Several alternatives to 3-iodo-7-nitro-1H-indazole (CAS: 864724-64-1) exist in t...

864724-64-13-iodo-7-nitro-1H-in...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to Benzene, bis[(trimethoxysilyl)ethyl] (CAS: 266317-71-9) in synthesis?

Yes, there are alternatives to Benzene, bis[(trimethoxysilyl)ethyl] (CAS: 266317...

266317-71-9Benzene, bis[(trimet...
Compound Q&A

Is Isothiazole-3-carbonitrile (CAS: 1452-17-1) safe?

Isothiazole-3-carbonitrile (CAS: 1452-17-1) is generally considered safe when us...

1452-17-1Isothiazole-3-carbon...
Compound Q&A

Is (3-Chlorophenyl)methanol (CAS: 873-63-2) safe?

(3-Chlorophenyl)methanol (CAS: 873-63-2) is considered low to moderately toxic. ...

873-63-2(3-Chlorophenyl)meth...
Compound Q&A

How is (2S,3S)-2-Hydroxy-3-({[(2-methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}amino)-3-(2-naphthyl)propanoic acid (CAS: 959583-98-3) typically synthesized?

(2S,3S)-2-Hydroxy-3-({[(2-methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}amino)-3-(2-naphthyl)pr...

959583-98-3(2S,3S)-2-Hydroxy-3-...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling Methyl 2-(bromomethyl)-5-methoxybenzoate (CAS: 788081-99-2)?

Proper handling of methyl 2-(bromomethyl)-5-methoxybenzoate requires the use of ...

788081-99-2Methyl 2-(bromomethy...
Compound Q&A

What is 6,8-Dibromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-2-carboxylic acid (CAS: 904805-36-3)?

6,8-Dibromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-2-carboxylic acid (CAS: 904805-36-3) is an aro...

904805-36-36,8-Dibromoimidazo[1...
Compound Q&A

Is 3-Amino-5-bromo-2-pyridinecarbonitrile (CAS: 573675-27-1) safe?

3-Amino-5-bromo-2-pyridinecarbonitrile is considered safe when handled under pro...

573675-27-13-Amino-5-bromo-2-py...

Source Journal

Reaction Chemistry & Engineering

Reaction Chemistry & Engineering
CiteScore: 0
Self-citation Rate: 8.8%
Articles per Year: 284

Reaction Chemistry & Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal reporting cutting-edge research focused on enhancing the understanding and efficiency of reactions. Reaction engineering leverages the interface where fundamental molecular chemistry meets chemical engineering and technology. Challenges in chemistry can be overcome by the application of new technologies, while engineers may find improved solutions for process development from the latest developments in reaction chemistry. Reaction Chemistry & Engineering is a unique forum for researchers whose interests span the broad areas of chemical engineering and chemical sciences to come together in solving problems of importance to wider society. All papers should be written to be approachable by readers across the engineering and chemical sciences. Papers that consider multiple scales, from the laboratory up to and including plant scale, are particularly encouraged.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.