Understanding alcohol aggregates and the water hydrogen bond network towards miscibility in alcohol solutions: graph theoretical analysis

Literature Information

Publication Date 2020-07-08
DOI 10.1039/D0CP01991G
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Seungeui Choi, Saravanan Parameswaran, Jun-Ho Choi


View Original

Abstract

Under ambient conditions, methanol and ethanol are miscible in water at all concentrations, while n-butanol is partially miscible. This is the first study to quantitatively examine the miscibility of butanol and compare with miscible alcohols by employing molecular dynamics simulations and graph theoretical analysis of three water-alcohol mixtures at various concentrations. We show how distinct alcohol aggregates are formed, thereby affecting the water structure, which established the relationship between the morphological structure of the aggregates and the miscibility of the alcohol in aqueous solution. The aggregates of methanol and ethanol in highly concentrated solutions form an extended H-bond network that intertwines well with the H-bond network of water. n-Butanol tends to self-associate and form large aggregates, while such aggregates are segregated from water. Graph theoretical analysis revealed that the alcohol aggregates of methanol and ethanol solutions have a morphological structure different from that of n-butanol, although there is no significant difference in morphology between the three pure alcohols. These two distinct alcohol aggregates are classified as water-compatible and water-incompatible depending upon their interaction with the water H-bond network, and their effect on the water structure was investigated. Our study reveals that the water-compatible network of alcohol aggregates in methanol and ethanol solutions disrupts the water H-bond networks, while the water-incompatible network of n-butanol aggregates does not considerably alter the water structure, which is consistent with the experimental results. Furthermore, we propose that miscible alcohols form water-compatible networks in binary aqueous systems while partially miscible alcohols form water-incompatible networks. The bifurcating hypothesis on the alcohol aggregation behavior in liquid water is of critical use to understand the fundamental issues such as solubility and phase separation in solution systems.

Related Literature

Study of substituent effects for aliphatic CH3–X compounds by resonant Auger spectroscopy

Oksana Travnikova, Svante Svensson, Denis Céolin, Zhuo Bao, Maria Novella Piancastelli

2008-12-03 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B805912H

Aluminium siting in the ZSM-5 framework by combination of high resolution 27Al NMR and DFT/MM calculations

Stepan Sklenak, Jiří Dědeček, Chengbin Li, Blanka Wichterlová, Vendula Gábová, Marek Sierka, Joachim Sauer

2008-12-12 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B807755J

ENDOR and HYSCORE analysis and DFT-assisted identification of the third major stable radical in sucrose single crystals X-irradiated at room temperature

Ewald Pauwels, Henk Vrielinck, Einar Sagstuen, Sabine Van Doorslaer, Freddy Callens, Michel Waroquier

2009-01-13 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B816641B

Molecular mobility and relaxation process of isolated lignin studied by multifrequency calorimetric experiments

Nathanael Guigo, Alice Mija, Luc Vincent, Nicolas Sbirrazzuoli

2009-01-07 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B812512K

Blinking photoluminescence properties of single TiO2 nanodiscs: interfacial electron transfer dynamics

Seung-Do Oh, Yung Doug Suh, Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, Minjoong Yoon

2008-11-06 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B812361F

Front cover

Cover

DOI: 10.1039/B900821G

Plicatin B conformational landscape and affinity to copper (I and II) metal cations. A DFT study

Giuliano Alagona, Caterina Ghio

2008-12-16 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B813464B

Skeletal Ru/Cucatalysts prepared from crystalline and quasicrystalline ternary alloy precursors: characterization by X-ray absorption spectroscopy and COoxidation

James Highfield, Tao Liu, Yook Si Loo, Benjamin Grushko, Armando Borgna

2009-01-08 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B811775F

You might also like

Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to 1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-N-hydroxymethanimine (CAS: 3848-36-0) in synthesis?

When considering alternatives to 1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-N-hydroxymethanimine (CAS: 3...

3848-36-01-(4-Chlorophenyl)-N...
Compound Q&A

How is 3-(4-Bromophenyl)-5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazole (CAS: 419553-16-5) typically synthesized?

3-(4-Bromophenyl)-5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazole is synthesized through a m...

419553-16-53-(4-Bromophenyl)-5-...
Compound Q&A

How is 5-Chloro-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-methyl-6-[3-(1-piperidinyl)propoxy]pyrimidine (CAS: 1639220-19-1) typically synthesized?

5-Chloro-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-methyl-6-[3-(1-piperidinyl)propoxy]pyrimidine (CAS...

1639220-19-15-Chloro-2-(4-chloro...
Compound Q&A

What industries use 2-Chloro-4-(difluoromethoxy)pyridine (CAS: 1206978-15-5)?

2-Chloro-4-(difluoromethoxy)pyridine is used in the pharmaceutical industry for ...

1206978-15-52-Chloro-4-(difluoro...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 3-Chloro-6-methylpyridazine (CAS: 1121-79-5)?

3-Chloro-6-methylpyridazine (CAS: 1121-79-5) is classified under the Globally Ha...

1121-79-53-Chloro-6-methylpyr...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to Methyl 4,5-dimethyl-2-nitrobenzoate in synthesis?

Several alternatives can be used in the synthesis of Methyl 4,5-dimethyl-2-nitro...

90922-74-0Methyl 4,5-dimethyl-...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to (2E,2'E)-3,3'-(1,4-Phenylene)bisacrylaldehyde in synthesis?

Alternatives to (2E,2'E)-3,3'-(1,4-Phenylene)bisacrylaldehyde include other acry...

63405-68-5(2E,2'E)-3,3'-(1,4-P...
Compound Q&A

What is 3-Amino-5-chloropyridin-2-ol hydrochloride (CAS: 1261906-29-9)?

3-Amino-5-chloropyridin-2-ol hydrochloride is an organic compound with the CAS n...

1261906-29-93-Amino-5-chloropyri...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling 6,7-Difluoro-2,3-dihydro-4H-chromen-4-one (CAS: 1092349-93-3)?

When handling 6,7-Difluoro-2,3-dihydro-4H-chromen-4-one, it is essential to wear...

1092349-93-36,7-Difluoro-2,3-dih...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.