Thermodynamics of Fe3O4–Co3O4 and Fe3O4–Mn3O4 spinel solid solutions at the bulk and nanoscale
Literature Information
Sulata K. Sahu, Baiyu Huang, Kristina Lilova, Brian F. Woodfield, Alexandra Navrotsky
High temperature oxide melt solution calorimetry has been performed to investigate the enthalpies of mixing (ΔmixH) of bulk and nanophase (1 − x)Fe3O4–xM3O4 (M = Co, Mn) spinel solid solutions. The entropies of mixing (ΔmixS) were calculated from the configurational entropies based on cation distributions, and the Gibbs free energies of mixing (ΔmixG) were obtained. The ΔmixH and ΔmixG for the (1 − x)Fe3O4–xCo3O4 system are negative over the complete solid solution range, for both macroscopic and nanoparticulate materials. In (1 − x)Fe3O4–xMn3O4, the formation enthalpies of cubic Fe3O4 (magnetite) and tetragonal Mn3O4 (hausmannite) are negative for Mn3O4 mole fractions less than 0.67 and slightly positive for higher manganese content. Relative to cubic Fe3O4 and cubic Mn3O4 (stable at high temperature), the enthalpies and Gibbs energies of mixing are negative over the entire composition range. A combination of measured mixing enthalpies and reported Gibbs energies in the literature provides experimental entropies of mixing. The experimental entropies of mixing are consistent with those calculated from cation distributions for x > 0.3 but are smaller than those predicted for x < 0.3. This discrepancy may be related to the calculations, having treated Fe2+ and Fe3+ as distinguishable species. The measured surface energies of the (1 − x)Fe3O4–xM3O4 solid solutions are in the range of 0.6–0.9 J m−2, similar to those of many other spinels. Because the surface energies are relatively constant, the thermodynamics of mixing at a given particle size throughout the solid solution can be considered independent of the particular particle size, thus confirming and extending the conclusions of a recent study on iron spinels.
Related Literature
New insights into radical and cationic polymerizations upon visible light exposure: role of novel photoinitiator systems based on the pyrene chromophore
Mohamad-Ali Tehfe, Frédéric Dumur, Emmanuel Contal, Bernadette Graff, Fabrice Morlet-Savary, Didier Gigmes, Jean-Pierre Fouassier, Jacques Lalevée
DOI: 10.1039/C2PY20950K
Synthesis, assembly, and cross-linking of polymeramphiphilesin situ: polyurethane–polylactide core–shell particles
Kevin P. McNamee, Louis M. Pitet, Daniel M. Knauss
DOI: 10.1039/C3PY00030C
Controlled thiol–ene post-polymerization reactions on polyferrocenylsilane homopolymers and block copolymers
Laurent Chabanne, Stefan Pfirrmann, David J. Lunn, Ian Manners
DOI: 10.1039/C3PY21129K
A one component methodology for the fabrication of honeycomb films from biocompatible amphiphilic block copolymer hybrids: a linear–dendritic–linear twist
Marie V. Walter, Pontus Lundberg, Daniel Hult, Anders Hult, Michael Malkoch
DOI: 10.1039/C3PY00053B
Dual responsive micelles based on poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate] and poly(2-(di-methylamino)ethyl methacrylate) for effective doxorubicin delivery
Shi Jie Ong, Yin Ting Tung, Hoi Teng Choo
DOI: 10.1039/C3PY00096F
Optimization, automation and validation of the large-scale radiosynthesis of Al18F tracers in a custom-made automatic platform for high yield
Zhiguo Liu, Lun Yu, Kai Cheng, Yabo Feng, Pengfei Qiu, Yongkang Gai, Ming Zhou
DOI: 10.1039/D0RE00144A
The importance of ligand reactions in Cu(0)-mediated living radical polymerisation of acrylates
Athina Anastasaki, Christopher Waldron, Paul Wilson, Ronan McHale, David M. Haddleton
DOI: 10.1039/C3PY00270E
Living radical polymerization of vinyl acetate and methyl acrylate mediated by Co(Salen*) complexes
Chei-Ming Liao, Ching-Chun Hsu, Fu-Sheng Wang, Bradford B. Wayland, Chi-How Peng
DOI: 10.1039/C3PY00282A
Continuous production of iron oxide nanoparticles via fast and economical high temperature synthesis
Maximilian O. Besenhard, Alec P. LaGrow, Simone Famiani, Martina Pucciarelli, Paola Lettieri, Asterios Gavriilidis
DOI: 10.1039/D0RE00078G
You might also like
What is 1-(2,4,6-Trifluorophenyl)ethanol (CAS: 1250113-83-7)?
1-(2,4,6-Trifluorophenyl)ethanol is an organic compound with the CAS number 1250...
Is 1-(2,4-Dimethoxybenzyl)-4-(hydroxymethyl)-2-pyrrolidinone (CAS: 919111-34-5) safe?
1-(2,4-Dimethoxybenzyl)-4-(hydroxymethyl)-2-pyrrolidinone (CAS: 919111-34-5) is ...
What are the physical and chemical properties of (7S,15R)-6β,15-Diacetoxy-7α,20-epoxy-7-hydroxykaura-2,16-dien-1-one (CAS: 51419-51-3)?
(7S,15R)-6β,15-Diacetoxy-7α,20-epoxy-7-hydroxykaura-2,16-dien-1-one is a crystal...
What regulatory guidelines apply to rac-ethyl (1r,4r)-4-hydroxycyclohexane-1-carboxylate, trans (CAS: 3618-04-0)?
The compound rac-ethyl (1r,4r)-4-hydroxycyclohexane-1-carboxylate, trans (CAS: 3...
What is the market or research trend for 2-(2,4-Difluorophenoxy)-3-nitropyridine (CAS: 175135-62-3)?
The market for 2-(2,4-Difluorophenoxy)-3-nitropyridine (CAS: 175135-62-3) is cur...
What are the main uses of 6-Diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine (CAS: 157-03-9)?
The main uses of 6-Diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine (CAS: 157-03-9) include research in ...
What precautions should be taken when handling 2-Aminoethyl-mono-amide-DOTA-tris(tBu ester) (CAS: 173308-19-5)?
When handling 2-Aminoethyl-mono-amide-DOTA-tris(tBu ester) (CAS: 173308-19-5), i...
How is 5-Methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carbaldehyde (CAS: 178488-37-4) typically synthesized?
5-Methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carbaldehyde (CAS: 178488-37-4) can be synthesi...
Are there alternatives to 2,4,6-Trihydroxyisophthalaldehyde (CAS: 4396-13-8) in synthesis?
There are alternative reagents that can be used in the synthesis of 2,4,6-Trihyd...
What is (2Z)-3-(5-Fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-sulfanylacrylic acid (CAS: 179461-52-0)?
(2Z)-3-(5-Fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-sulfanylacrylic acid is a chemical compound wi...
Source Journal
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.














