Continuous production of iron oxide nanoparticles via fast and economical high temperature synthesis
Literature Information
Maximilian O. Besenhard, Alec P. LaGrow, Simone Famiani, Martina Pucciarelli, Paola Lettieri, Asterios Gavriilidis
From all of the iron oxide nanoparticle (IONP) syntheses, thermal decomposition methods are the most developed for controlling particle properties, but suffer from poor reproducibility at larger scale. An alternative solution for large scale production is continuous synthesis, where the production volume can be increased with longer operation times. However, continuous thermal decomposition synthesis is not trivial as it requires oxygen and water removal from the precursor solution, reaction temperatures above 230 °C, and the formation of particles is likely to cause reactor fouling. This work presents a continuous thermal decomposition synthesis of IONPs using a tubular flow reactor, which provides inert reaction conditions at temperatures of up to 290 °C, and heating/cooling at rates which cannot be achieved in standard batch systems. This makes it possible to define the start and endpoint accurately, hence, allowing for a well-controlled and scalable thermal decomposition synthesis. A simple synthetic protocol was chosen using only ferric acetylacetonate, oleylamine, and 1-octadecene as a solvent, but no additives to minimise costs. In this flow reactor residence times of less than 10 min were shown to be sufficient to synthesise monodisperse IONPs of 5–7 nm and achieve precursor conversion between 10–70% depending on the reaction temperature. For all synthesis conditions tested, there was no indication of reactor fouling. Since the precursor conversion correlated to the residence time and reaction temperature, but particle sizes were comparable for all reaction conditions studied, the particle formation is proposed to follow mechanisms other than classical nucleation and growth. To examine possible economic advantages of such a continuous thermal decomposition process as compared to a conventional batch synthesis, a cost analysis, comparing costs assigned to chemicals, reactor equipment, energy and labour, was performed.
Related Literature
Water-in-water mesophases for templating inorganics
Andreas Taubert, Ernst Furrer, Wolfgang Meier
DOI: 10.1039/B405610H
Secondary coordination sphere controlled reversible geometry reorganisations in copper(ii) complexes
John Fielden, De-Liang Long, Leroy Cronin
DOI: 10.1039/B407229D
A C3-symmetric molecular scaffold for the construction of large receptors
Gebhard Haberhauer, Thomas Oeser, Frank Rominger
DOI: 10.1039/B406335J
Racemic d,l-asparagine causes enantiomeric excess of other coexisting racemic d,l-amino acids during recrystallization: a hypothesis accounting for the origin of l-amino acids in the biosphere
Shosuke Kojo, Hiromi Uchino, Mayu Yoshimura, Kyoko Tanaka
DOI: 10.1039/B409941A
A p-phosphinophenolate ligand for the palladium-catalysed arylation of alkenes
Eiji Shirakawa, Keijiro Ishii, Teruhisa Tsuchimoto
DOI: 10.1039/B411125G
A supramolecular approach to the selective detection of dopamine in the presence of ascorbate
Alex Fragoso, Eduardo Almirall, Roberto Cao, Luis Echegoyen, Raúl González-Jonte
DOI: 10.1039/B407792J
Polysulfones: solid organic catalysts for the chemoselective cleavage of methyl-substituted allyl ethers under neutral conditions
Dean Marković, Peter Steunenberg, Martin Ekstrand, Pierre Vogel
DOI: 10.1039/B410965A
Practical asymmetric synthesis of β-hydroxy-β-trifluoromethylated ketonesvia the first example of the in situ generation of trifluoro-acetaldehyde and its successive asymmetric carbon–carbon bond formation reaction with chiral imines
Kazumasa Funabiki, Wataru Hashimoto, Masaki Matsui
DOI: 10.1039/B408226E
A samarium cyclooctatetraene complex as catalyst for hydroamination/cyclisation catalysis
Agustino Zulys, Tarun K. Panda, Michael T. Gamer, Peter W. Roesky
DOI: 10.1039/B410918J
Biomimetic thermo-responsive star diblock gelators
Yuting Li, Ravin Narain, Yinghua Ma, Andrew L. Lewis, Steven P. Armes
DOI: 10.1039/B410150B
You might also like
What is 1-(2,4,6-Trifluorophenyl)ethanol (CAS: 1250113-83-7)?
1-(2,4,6-Trifluorophenyl)ethanol is an organic compound with the CAS number 1250...
Is 1-(2,4-Dimethoxybenzyl)-4-(hydroxymethyl)-2-pyrrolidinone (CAS: 919111-34-5) safe?
1-(2,4-Dimethoxybenzyl)-4-(hydroxymethyl)-2-pyrrolidinone (CAS: 919111-34-5) is ...
What are the physical and chemical properties of (7S,15R)-6β,15-Diacetoxy-7α,20-epoxy-7-hydroxykaura-2,16-dien-1-one (CAS: 51419-51-3)?
(7S,15R)-6β,15-Diacetoxy-7α,20-epoxy-7-hydroxykaura-2,16-dien-1-one is a crystal...
What regulatory guidelines apply to rac-ethyl (1r,4r)-4-hydroxycyclohexane-1-carboxylate, trans (CAS: 3618-04-0)?
The compound rac-ethyl (1r,4r)-4-hydroxycyclohexane-1-carboxylate, trans (CAS: 3...
What is the market or research trend for 2-(2,4-Difluorophenoxy)-3-nitropyridine (CAS: 175135-62-3)?
The market for 2-(2,4-Difluorophenoxy)-3-nitropyridine (CAS: 175135-62-3) is cur...
What are the main uses of 6-Diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine (CAS: 157-03-9)?
The main uses of 6-Diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine (CAS: 157-03-9) include research in ...
What precautions should be taken when handling 2-Aminoethyl-mono-amide-DOTA-tris(tBu ester) (CAS: 173308-19-5)?
When handling 2-Aminoethyl-mono-amide-DOTA-tris(tBu ester) (CAS: 173308-19-5), i...
How is 5-Methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carbaldehyde (CAS: 178488-37-4) typically synthesized?
5-Methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carbaldehyde (CAS: 178488-37-4) can be synthesi...
Are there alternatives to 2,4,6-Trihydroxyisophthalaldehyde (CAS: 4396-13-8) in synthesis?
There are alternative reagents that can be used in the synthesis of 2,4,6-Trihyd...
What is (2Z)-3-(5-Fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-sulfanylacrylic acid (CAS: 179461-52-0)?
(2Z)-3-(5-Fluoro-1H-indol-3-yl)-2-sulfanylacrylic acid is a chemical compound wi...
Source Journal
Reaction Chemistry & Engineering

Reaction Chemistry & Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal reporting cutting-edge research focused on enhancing the understanding and efficiency of reactions. Reaction engineering leverages the interface where fundamental molecular chemistry meets chemical engineering and technology. Challenges in chemistry can be overcome by the application of new technologies, while engineers may find improved solutions for process development from the latest developments in reaction chemistry. Reaction Chemistry & Engineering is a unique forum for researchers whose interests span the broad areas of chemical engineering and chemical sciences to come together in solving problems of importance to wider society. All papers should be written to be approachable by readers across the engineering and chemical sciences. Papers that consider multiple scales, from the laboratory up to and including plant scale, are particularly encouraged.














