Benchmarks for 0–0 transitions of aromatic organic molecules: DFT/B3LYP, ADC(2), CC2, SOS-CC2 and SCS-CC2 compared to high-resolution gas-phase data

Literature Information

Publication Date 2012-10-19
DOI 10.1039/C2CP42694C
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Nina O. C. Winter, Nora K. Graf, Samuel Leutwyler, Christof Hättig


View Original

Abstract

In the present study a benchmark set of medium-sized and large aromatic organic molecules with 10–78 atoms is presented. For this test set 0–0 transition energies measured in supersonic jets are compared to those calculated with DFT and the B3LYP functional, ADC(2), CC2 and the spin-scaled CC2 variants SOS-CC2 and SCS-CC2. Geometries of the ground and excited states have been optimized with these methods in polarized triple zeta basis sets. Zero-point vibrational corrections have been calculated with the same methods and basis sets. In addition the energies have been corrected by single point calculations with a triple zeta basis augmented with diffuse functions, aug-cc-pVTZ. The deviations of the theoretical results from experimental electronic origins, which have all been measured in the gas phase with high-resolution techniques, were evaluated. The accuracy of SOS-CC2 is comparable to that of unscaled CC2, whereas ADC(2) has slightly larger errors. The lowest errors were found for SCS-CC2. All correlated wave function methods provide significantly better results than DFT with the B3LYP functional. The effects of the energy corrections from the augmented basis set and the method-consistent calculation of the zero-point vibrational corrections are small. With this benchmark set reliable reference data for 0–0 transition energies for larger organic chromophores are available that can be used to benchmark the accuracy of other quantum chemical methods such as new DFT functionals or semi-empirical methods for excitation energies and structures and thereby augments available benchmark sets augments present benchmark sets which include mainly smaller molecules.

Related Literature

Lone-pair distribution and plumbite network formation in high lead silicate glass, 80PbO·20SiO2

Oliver L. G. Alderman, Alex C. Hannon, Diane Holland, Steve Feller, Gloria Lehr, Adam J. Vitale, Uwe Hoppe, Martin v. Zimmerman, Anke Watenphul

2013-04-29 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C3CP51348C

Insights into the adsorption and energy transfer of Ag clusters on the AgCl(100) surface

Xiangchao Ma, Ying Dai, Meng Guo, Yingtao Zhu, Baibiao Huang

2013-01-30 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C3CP44519D

New Li2FeSiO4–carbon monoliths with controlled macropores: effects of pore properties on electrode performance

George Hasegawa, Mai Sannohe, Yuya Ishihara, Kazuyoshi Kanamori, Kazuki Nakanishi, Takeshi Abe

2013-04-09 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C3CP50352F

The electronic structure of pyracene: a spectroscopic and computational study

Johannes Auerswald, Bernd Engels, Ingo Fischer, Thiemo Gerbich, Jörg Herterich, Anke Krueger, Melanie Lang, Hans-Christian Schmitt, Christof Schon, Christof Walter

2013-03-27 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C3CP44271C

Comparison of the performance of an array of nanoband electrodes with a macro electrode with similar overall area

Reshma Sultana, Naser Reza, Helena Woodvine, Jonathan G. Terry, Anthony J. Walton, Charlotte L. Brady, Ilka Schmueser, Andrew R. Mount

2013-04-05 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C3CP50759A

Field effect transistors and RC filters from pencil-trace on paper

Narendra Kurra, Dipanwita Dutta, Giridhar U. Kulkarni

2013-03-25 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C3CP50675D

Structure of Nb2O5–NaPO3 glasses by X-ray and neutron diffraction

U. Hoppe, L. Delevoye, L. Montagne, M. v. Zimmermann, A. C. Hannon

2012-12-03 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C2CP42772A

C60fullerene aggregation in aqueous solution

Yuriy I. Prylutskyy, Anatoly S. Buchelnikov, Dmitry P. Voronin, Viktor V. Kostjukov, Uwe Ritter, John A. Parkinson, Maxim P. Evstigneev

2013-04-16 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C3CP50187F

You might also like

Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for N-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-2-pyridinamine (CAS: 52818-63-0)?

N-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-2-pyridinamine (CAS: 52818-63-0) is increasingly being used ...

52818-63-0N-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling Ethyl 4-(2-chlorophenyl)-1,3-thiazole-2-carboxylate (CAS: 1050507-06-6)?

When handling Ethyl 4-(2-chlorophenyl)-1,3-thiazole-2-carboxylate, appropriate p...

1050507-06-6Ethyl 4-(2-chlorophe...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to diethyldiselane (CAS: 628-39-7)?

Diethyldiselane (CAS: 628-39-7) is classified under the Globally Harmonized Syst...

628-39-7Diethyldiselane
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for oxocopper (CAS: 12053-18-8)?

The market for oxocopper (CAS: 12053-18-8) is primarily driven by its use in cat...

12053-18-8oxocopper; oxo-(oxoc...
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for 5-{[(2-Methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}-5-azaspiro[2.4]heptane-7-carboxylic acid?

The market for 5-{[(2-Methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}-5-azaspiro[2.4]heptane-7-c...

1268519-54-55-{[(2-Methyl-2-prop...
Compound Q&A

What is 2-(1-Pyrrolidinyl)-4-pyridinamine (CAS: 35981-63-6)?

2-(1-Pyrrolidinyl)-4-pyridinamine is a chemical compound with the CAS number 359...

35981-63-62-(1-Pyrrolidinyl)-4...
Compound Q&A

What are the physical and chemical properties of 2-(3-Pyridinyl)-1-azabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (CAS: 91556-75-1)?

2-(3-Pyridinyl)-1-azabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (CAS: 91556-75-1) is a crystalline sol...

91556-75-12-(3-Pyridinyl)-1-az...
Compound Q&A

How is (S)-Alpha-allyl-proline hydrochloride (CAS: 129704-91-2) typically synthesized?

(S)-Alpha-allyl-proline hydrochloride is usually synthesized via a Wittig reacti...

129704-91-2(S)-Alpha-allyl-prol...
Compound Q&A

What is 3-Methyl-1,2-oxazole-5-carboxylic acid (CAS: 4857-42-5)?

3-Methyl-1,2-oxazole-5-carboxylic acid (CAS: 4857-42-5) is an organic compound w...

4857-42-53-Methyl-1,2-oxazole...
Compound Q&A

How is Lys-SMCC-DM1 (CAS: 1281816-04-3) typically synthesized?

Lys-SMCC-DM1 is synthesized via a multi-step process involving the coupling of S...

1281816-04-3Lys-SMCC-DM1

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.