Benchmarks for 0–0 transitions of aromatic organic molecules: DFT/B3LYP, ADC(2), CC2, SOS-CC2 and SCS-CC2 compared to high-resolution gas-phase data
Literature Information
Nina O. C. Winter, Nora K. Graf, Samuel Leutwyler, Christof Hättig
In the present study a benchmark set of medium-sized and large aromatic organic molecules with 10–78 atoms is presented. For this test set 0–0 transition energies measured in supersonic jets are compared to those calculated with DFT and the B3LYP functional, ADC(2), CC2 and the spin-scaled CC2 variants SOS-CC2 and SCS-CC2. Geometries of the ground and excited states have been optimized with these methods in polarized triple zeta basis sets. Zero-point vibrational corrections have been calculated with the same methods and basis sets. In addition the energies have been corrected by single point calculations with a triple zeta basis augmented with diffuse functions, aug-cc-pVTZ. The deviations of the theoretical results from experimental electronic origins, which have all been measured in the gas phase with high-resolution techniques, were evaluated. The accuracy of SOS-CC2 is comparable to that of unscaled CC2, whereas ADC(2) has slightly larger errors. The lowest errors were found for SCS-CC2. All correlated wave function methods provide significantly better results than DFT with the B3LYP functional. The effects of the energy corrections from the augmented basis set and the method-consistent calculation of the zero-point vibrational corrections are small. With this benchmark set reliable reference data for 0–0 transition energies for larger organic chromophores are available that can be used to benchmark the accuracy of other quantum chemical methods such as new DFT functionals or semi-empirical methods for excitation energies and structures and thereby augments available benchmark sets augments present benchmark sets which include mainly smaller molecules.
Related Literature
Reversibility in protein folding: effect of β-cyclodextrin on bovine serum albumin unfolded by sodium dodecyl sulphate
Uttam Anand, Saptarshi Mukherjee
DOI: 10.1039/C3CP50207D
Lone-pair distribution and plumbite network formation in high lead silicate glass, 80PbO·20SiO2
Oliver L. G. Alderman, Alex C. Hannon, Diane Holland, Steve Feller, Gloria Lehr, Adam J. Vitale, Uwe Hoppe, Martin v. Zimmerman, Anke Watenphul
DOI: 10.1039/C3CP51348C
Insights into the adsorption and energy transfer of Ag clusters on the AgCl(100) surface
Xiangchao Ma, Ying Dai, Meng Guo, Yingtao Zhu, Baibiao Huang
DOI: 10.1039/C3CP44519D
Accurate determination of the ultrafast proton transfer rate in porphycene using nuclear spin relaxation
Piotr Bernatowicz
DOI: 10.1039/C3CP50963J
New Li2FeSiO4–carbon monoliths with controlled macropores: effects of pore properties on electrode performance
George Hasegawa, Mai Sannohe, Yuya Ishihara, Kazuyoshi Kanamori, Kazuki Nakanishi, Takeshi Abe
DOI: 10.1039/C3CP50352F
The electronic structure of pyracene: a spectroscopic and computational study
Johannes Auerswald, Bernd Engels, Ingo Fischer, Thiemo Gerbich, Jörg Herterich, Anke Krueger, Melanie Lang, Hans-Christian Schmitt, Christof Schon, Christof Walter
DOI: 10.1039/C3CP44271C
Comparison of the performance of an array of nanoband electrodes with a macro electrode with similar overall area
Reshma Sultana, Naser Reza, Helena Woodvine, Jonathan G. Terry, Anthony J. Walton, Charlotte L. Brady, Ilka Schmueser, Andrew R. Mount
DOI: 10.1039/C3CP50759A
Field effect transistors and RC filters from pencil-trace on paper
Narendra Kurra, Dipanwita Dutta, Giridhar U. Kulkarni
DOI: 10.1039/C3CP50675D
Structure of Nb2O5–NaPO3 glasses by X-ray and neutron diffraction
U. Hoppe, L. Delevoye, L. Montagne, M. v. Zimmermann, A. C. Hannon
DOI: 10.1039/C2CP42772A
C60fullerene aggregation in aqueous solution
Yuriy I. Prylutskyy, Anatoly S. Buchelnikov, Dmitry P. Voronin, Viktor V. Kostjukov, Uwe Ritter, John A. Parkinson, Maxim P. Evstigneev
DOI: 10.1039/C3CP50187F
You might also like
What is the market or research trend for N-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-2-pyridinamine (CAS: 52818-63-0)?
N-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-2-pyridinamine (CAS: 52818-63-0) is increasingly being used ...
What precautions should be taken when handling Ethyl 4-(2-chlorophenyl)-1,3-thiazole-2-carboxylate (CAS: 1050507-06-6)?
When handling Ethyl 4-(2-chlorophenyl)-1,3-thiazole-2-carboxylate, appropriate p...
What regulatory guidelines apply to diethyldiselane (CAS: 628-39-7)?
Diethyldiselane (CAS: 628-39-7) is classified under the Globally Harmonized Syst...
What is the market or research trend for oxocopper (CAS: 12053-18-8)?
The market for oxocopper (CAS: 12053-18-8) is primarily driven by its use in cat...
What is the market or research trend for 5-{[(2-Methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}-5-azaspiro[2.4]heptane-7-carboxylic acid?
The market for 5-{[(2-Methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}-5-azaspiro[2.4]heptane-7-c...
What is 2-(1-Pyrrolidinyl)-4-pyridinamine (CAS: 35981-63-6)?
2-(1-Pyrrolidinyl)-4-pyridinamine is a chemical compound with the CAS number 359...
What are the physical and chemical properties of 2-(3-Pyridinyl)-1-azabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (CAS: 91556-75-1)?
2-(3-Pyridinyl)-1-azabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (CAS: 91556-75-1) is a crystalline sol...
How is (S)-Alpha-allyl-proline hydrochloride (CAS: 129704-91-2) typically synthesized?
(S)-Alpha-allyl-proline hydrochloride is usually synthesized via a Wittig reacti...
What is 3-Methyl-1,2-oxazole-5-carboxylic acid (CAS: 4857-42-5)?
3-Methyl-1,2-oxazole-5-carboxylic acid (CAS: 4857-42-5) is an organic compound w...
How is Lys-SMCC-DM1 (CAS: 1281816-04-3) typically synthesized?
Lys-SMCC-DM1 is synthesized via a multi-step process involving the coupling of S...
Source Journal
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.













![1-(1-Benzyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2(3H)-one structure 1-(1-Benzyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2(3H)-one structure](https://static.chemtradehub.com/structs/603/60373-71-9-7dfb.webp)
![1-oxaspiro[4.4]nonan-6-one structure 1-oxaspiro[4.4]nonan-6-one structure](https://static.chemtradehub.com/structs/134/134179-01-4-e051.webp)