Dynamics of the D+ + H2 and H+ + D2 reactions: a detailed comparison between theory and experiment
Literature Information
J. M. Alvariño, D. Gerlich, M. Hankel, V. J. Herrero, V. Sáez-Rábanos, F. J. Aoiz
An extensive set of experimental measurements on the dynamics of the H+ + D2 and D+ + H2 ion–molecule reactions is compared with the results of quantum mechanical (QM), quasiclassical trajectory (QCT), and statistical quasiclassical trajectory (SQCT) calculations. The dynamical observables considered include specific rate coefficients as a function of the translational energy, ET, thermal rate coefficients in the 100–500 K temperature range. In addition, kinetic energy spectra (KES) of the D+ ions reactively scattered in H+ + D2 collisions are also presented for translational energies between 0.4 eV and 2.0 eV. For the two reactions, the best global agreement between experiment and theory over the whole energy range corresponds to the QCT calculations using a Gaussian binning (GB) procedure, which gives more weight to trajectories whose product vibrational action is closer to the actual integer QM values. The QM calculations also perform well, although somewhat worse over the more limited range of translational energies where they are available (ET < 0.6 eV and ET < 0.2 eV for the H+ + D2 and D+ + H2 reactions, respectively). The worst agreement is obtained with the SQCT method, which is only adequate for low translational energies. The comparison between theory and experiment also suggests that the most reliable rate coefficient measurements are those obtained with the merged beams technique. It is worth noting that none of the theoretical approaches can account satisfactorily for the experimental specific rate coefficients of H+ + D2 for ET ≤ 0.2 eV although there is a considerable scatter in the existing measurements. On the whole, the best agreement with the experimental laboratory KES is obtained with the simulations carried out using the state resolved differential cross sections (DCSs) calculated with the QCT-GB method, which seems to account for most of the observed features. In contrast, the simulations with the SQCT data predict kinetic energy spectra (KES) considerably cooler than those experimentally determined.
Recommended Journals
Related Literature
Ferroelectricity in thin films driven by charges accumulated at interfaces
DOI: 10.1039/D0CP05617K
Quantum and classical effects in DNA point mutations: Watson–Crick tautomerism in AT and GC base pairs
L. Slocombe, J. S. Al-Khalili, M. Sacchi
DOI: 10.1039/D0CP05781A
Effective Debye relaxation models for binary solutions of polar liquids at terahertz frequencies
Juin W. Zhou, M. Hassan Arbab
DOI: 10.1039/D0CP06707E
Molecular biaxiality determines the helical structure – infrared measurements of the molecular order in the nematic twist-bend phase of difluoro terphenyl dimer
Katarzyna Merkel, Barbara Loska, Chris Welch, Georg H. Mehl, Antoni Kocot
DOI: 10.1039/D1CP00187F
The interplay between spatial and heliconical orientational order in twist-bend nematic materials
R. Saha, C. Welch, G. H. Mehl, J. Feng, C. Zhu, J. Gleeson
DOI: 10.1039/D0CP06633H
Surface contacts strongly influence the elasticity and thermal conductivity of silica nanoparticle fibers
Bohai Liu, Sudatta Das, Xiangfan Xu, Jingli Xie, Xu Deng, George Fytas
DOI: 10.1039/D0CP05377E
Boosting electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction performance of two-dimensional Mo porphyrin monolayers via turning the coordination environment
Shiqiang Liu, Zhiwen Cheng, Yawei Liu, Xiaoping Gao, Yujia Tan, Yuanyang Ren
DOI: 10.1039/D0CP06036D
Effect of an ionic environment on membrane fouling: a molecular dynamics study
Shivam Tiwari, Abhijit Gogoi, K. Anki Reddy
DOI: 10.1039/D0CP05268J
Efficiency analysis of helium-cooled MAS DNP: case studies of surface-modified nanoparticles and homogeneous small-molecule solutions
Takeshi Kobayashi, Jun Fukazawa, Frédéric A. Perras
DOI: 10.1039/D0CP05658H
You might also like
Is 6-(3-Fluorophenyl)picolinic acid (CAS: 887982-40-3) safe?
6-(3-Fluorophenyl)picolinic acid is generally considered safe for laboratory use...
What industries use (3R)-3-Pyrrolidinol (CAS: 2799-21-5)?
(3R)-3-Pyrrolidinol is used in the pharmaceutical industry as a precursor for dr...
What precautions should be taken when handling (4R,5R)-4,5-Diethoxycarbonyl-2,2-dimethyldioxolane (CAS: 59779-75-8)?
When handling (4R,5R)-4,5-Diethoxycarbonyl-2,2-dimethyldioxolane (CAS: 59779-75-...
How is 1-(6-Chloroimidazo[1,2-b]pyridazin-3-yl)ethanone (CAS: 90734-71-7) typically synthesized?
1-(6-Chloroimidazo[1,2-b]pyridazin-3-yl)ethanone is often synthesized via a mult...
What is the market or research trend for N-Ethyl-3,4-dimethylbenzylamine (CAS: 39180-83-1)?
The market for N-Ethyl-3,4-dimethylbenzylamine (CAS: 39180-83-1) remains steady,...
What is Tert-butyl 3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)azetidine-1-carboxylate (CAS: 1019008-21-9)?
Tert-butyl 3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)azetidine-1-carboxylate is a chemical compound wit...
What regulatory guidelines apply to 1-Bromo-3-chloro-2,4-dimethoxybenzene (CAS: 1228956-93-1)?
1-Bromo-3-chloro-2,4-dimethoxybenzene (CAS: 1228956-93-1) falls under the classi...
Is 8-Bromo-2-methyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-1(2H)-one (CAS: 1368622-07-4) safe?
The safety of 8-Bromo-2-methyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-1(2H)-one (CAS: 1368622-07...
Is Benzyl [(3S)-2,6-dioxo-3-piperidinyl]carbamate (CAS: 22785-43-9) safe?
Benzyl [(3S)-2,6-dioxo-3-piperidinyl]carbamate is generally safe when handled wi...
How should 1-{[4-(4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)phenyl]sulfonyl}pyrrolidine (CAS: 928657-21-0) be stored?
1-{[4-(4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)phenyl]sulfonyl}pyrrolidine s...
Source Journal
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.














