Spatially resolved investigation into the coke formation and chemical states of nickel during autothermal reforming of acetic acid over Ni/CeO2–ZrO2 catalysts

Literature Information

Publication Date 2022-02-15
DOI 10.1039/D1RE00561H
Impact Factor 4.239
Authors

Nat Phongprueksathat, Thanakorn Thanasujaree, Thirasak Rirksomboon


View Original

Abstract

Autothermal reforming (ATR) is a viable option for reducing coke formation and energy consumption in hydrogen production processes. The space-resolved ATR of acetic acid as a model compound over the Ni/Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 catalyst is performed using a spatial discretization approach by means of separating a reactor into up to 4 reaction zones. The spent catalysts from different zones were further characterized by ex situ XPS and TPO techniques to investigate the Ni oxidation states, coke morphology, and coke combustion. In addition, steam reforming (SR) and partial oxidation (POX) were similarly performed to decouple the effects of steam and oxygen from ATR. By comparing with SR, co-fed oxygen in ATR has significantly decreased the overall amount of coke formation with the implication on the reduced H2 yield partially due to the CO oxidation. The co-fed oxygen consumed in the frontal section of the catalyst bed resulted in the oxidation of metallic Ni, decreasing the acetic acid conversion of the initial zone of its catalyst bed. Such oxidized Ni species could also be reduced by H2 in the product stream of the previous zone resulting in a lower H2 yield. Although oxygen can reduce the overall coke formation, its coke structures have been shifted from filamentous coke to the formation of polymeric, soft, and carbidic cokes. Those types of cokes seemed to be related to the formation of NiO that promotes acetate formation and decomposition. In sum, the presence of oxygen in the part of the catalyst bed results in the differences of the catalytic activity, the oxidation state of Ni, and the pattern of coke formation; this has created two recognizable reaction zones.

Related Literature

Opening dynamics of HIV-1 gp120 upon receptor binding is dictated by a key hydrophobic core

Lin-Tai Da, Mengna Lin

2019-11-11 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C9CP04613E

Towards developing efficient metalloporphyrin-based hybrid photocatalysts for CO2 reduction; an ab initio study

Azar Ostovan, Nick Papior, Mansour Zahedi

2020-09-16 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP03279D

Back cover

Cover

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP90259D

Rotational spectra of van der Waals complexes: pyrrole–Ne and pyrrole–Ne2

Isabel Peña, Carlos Cabezas

2020-10-26 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP04580B

Unraveling the regioselectivity of odd electron halogen bond formation using electrophilicity index and chemical hardness parameters

Prasanta Bandyopadhyay, Soumyadip Ray, Md. Motin Seikh

2019-11-15 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C9CP05374C

Back cover

Cover

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP90264K

Micro-solvation of CO in water: infrared spectra and structural calculations for (D2O)2–CO and (D2O)3–CO

A. J. Barclay, A. Pietropolli Charmet, K. H. Michaelian, A. R. W. McKellar, N. Moazzen-Ahmadi

2019-11-21 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C9CP05480D

Controlling the outcome of SN2 reactions in ionic liquids: from rational data set design to predictive linear regression models

Alexandra Schindl, Rebecca R. Hawker, Karin S. Schaffarczyk McHale, Kenny T.-C. Liu, Andrew Y. Hsieh, Alyssa Gilbert, Stuart W. Prescott, Ronald S. Haines, Anna K. Croft, Jason B. Harper, Christof M. Jäger

2020-10-01 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP04224B

Magnetism modulation and conductance quantization in a gadolinium oxide memristor

Shuang Gao, Huali Yang, Gang Liu, Run-Wei Li

2020-10-31 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP03767B

Immobilization of arrestin-3 on different biosensor platforms for evaluating GPCR binding

Saziye Yorulmaz Avsar, Larisa E. Kapinos, Cora-Ann Schoenenberger, Jonas Mühle, Benoit Meger, Roderick Y. H. Lim, Martin K. Ostermaier, Cornelia G. Palivan

2020-09-29 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0CP01464H

You might also like

Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 2-Ethyl-4-Methyl-1H-Imidazole-5-Carbaldehyde (CAS: 88634-80-4) be handled?

Waste containing 2-Ethyl-4-Methyl-1H-Imidazole-5-Carbaldehyde (CAS: 88634-80-4) ...

88634-80-42-Ethyl-4-Methyl-1H-...
Compound Q&A

What industries use Triethoxy(octyl)silane (CAS: 1385031-14-0)?

Triethoxy(octyl)silane (CAS: 1385031-14-0) is widely used in the pharmaceuticals...

1385031-14-0Triethoxy(octyl)sila...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to 3-iodo-7-nitro-1H-indazole (CAS: 864724-64-1) in synthesis?

Several alternatives to 3-iodo-7-nitro-1H-indazole (CAS: 864724-64-1) exist in t...

864724-64-13-iodo-7-nitro-1H-in...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to Benzene, bis[(trimethoxysilyl)ethyl] (CAS: 266317-71-9) in synthesis?

Yes, there are alternatives to Benzene, bis[(trimethoxysilyl)ethyl] (CAS: 266317...

266317-71-9Benzene, bis[(trimet...
Compound Q&A

Is Isothiazole-3-carbonitrile (CAS: 1452-17-1) safe?

Isothiazole-3-carbonitrile (CAS: 1452-17-1) is generally considered safe when us...

1452-17-1Isothiazole-3-carbon...
Compound Q&A

Is (3-Chlorophenyl)methanol (CAS: 873-63-2) safe?

(3-Chlorophenyl)methanol (CAS: 873-63-2) is considered low to moderately toxic. ...

873-63-2(3-Chlorophenyl)meth...
Compound Q&A

How is (2S,3S)-2-Hydroxy-3-({[(2-methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}amino)-3-(2-naphthyl)propanoic acid (CAS: 959583-98-3) typically synthesized?

(2S,3S)-2-Hydroxy-3-({[(2-methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}amino)-3-(2-naphthyl)pr...

959583-98-3(2S,3S)-2-Hydroxy-3-...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling Methyl 2-(bromomethyl)-5-methoxybenzoate (CAS: 788081-99-2)?

Proper handling of methyl 2-(bromomethyl)-5-methoxybenzoate requires the use of ...

788081-99-2Methyl 2-(bromomethy...
Compound Q&A

What is 6,8-Dibromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-2-carboxylic acid (CAS: 904805-36-3)?

6,8-Dibromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-2-carboxylic acid (CAS: 904805-36-3) is an aro...

904805-36-36,8-Dibromoimidazo[1...
Compound Q&A

Is 3-Amino-5-bromo-2-pyridinecarbonitrile (CAS: 573675-27-1) safe?

3-Amino-5-bromo-2-pyridinecarbonitrile is considered safe when handled under pro...

573675-27-13-Amino-5-bromo-2-py...

Source Journal

Reaction Chemistry & Engineering

Reaction Chemistry & Engineering
CiteScore: 0
Self-citation Rate: 8.8%
Articles per Year: 284

Reaction Chemistry & Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal reporting cutting-edge research focused on enhancing the understanding and efficiency of reactions. Reaction engineering leverages the interface where fundamental molecular chemistry meets chemical engineering and technology. Challenges in chemistry can be overcome by the application of new technologies, while engineers may find improved solutions for process development from the latest developments in reaction chemistry. Reaction Chemistry & Engineering is a unique forum for researchers whose interests span the broad areas of chemical engineering and chemical sciences to come together in solving problems of importance to wider society. All papers should be written to be approachable by readers across the engineering and chemical sciences. Papers that consider multiple scales, from the laboratory up to and including plant scale, are particularly encouraged.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.