Catalytic cycle of the partial oxidation of methane to methanol over Cu-ZSM-5 revealed using DFT calculations

Literature Information

Publication Date 2021-02-05
DOI 10.1039/D0CP06696F
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors


View Original

Abstract

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed to investigate the catalytic cycle of methane conversion to methanol over both [Cu2(O2)]2+ and [Cu2(μ-O)]2+ active sites in the Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst. The [Cu2(O2)]2+ site is found to be active for the partial oxidation of methane to methanol, and although it has a higher energy barrier in the methane activation step, it involves a very low energy barrier in the methanol formation step (36.3 kJ mol−1) as well as a lower methanol desorption energy (52.5 kJ mol−1). As the [Cu2(O2)]2+ active site is also thermodynamically stable, it may play an important role during methane conversion to methanol. Furthermore, the methane activation step follows the homolytic route and the heterolytic route for the [Cu2(O2)]2+ and [Cu2(μ-O)]2+ active sites, respectively, whereas the methanol formation step follows the direct radical rebound mechanism and the indirect rebound mechanism, respectively. Our calculations further indicate that the electronic properties of the reactive O atoms in the active site influence their reactivity toward methane oxidation. More specifically, the higher the spin density and the more negative the charge of the reactive O atom at the active site are, the lower the energy barrier for methane activation will be; and the more negative the charge of the hydroxyl group in the reaction intermediate during the partial oxidation of methane to methanol is, the higher energy barrier of the methanol formation step will be in the triplet state. Furthermore, we used a larger cluster model to predict the mechanism of the methane activation step and the effect of atomic charge of the O atom at the [Cu2(μ-O)]2+ and [Cu2(O2)]2+ active sites on the energy barriers of partial oxidation of methane to methanol, and the conclusions drawn employing the larger cluster model are consistent with those drawn using the smaller double-5T-ring cluster model. In addition, different from the traditional mechanism for methane activation at [Cu2(O2)]2+, which consists of two transition states, we find that the partial oxidation of methane at [Cu2(O2)]2+ can also occur via a single step by direct insertion of one of the O atoms at the active site into the C–H bond of methane.

Related Literature

Understanding the adsorption mechanism of noble gases Kr and Xe in CPO-27-Ni, CPO-27-Mg, and ZIF-8

O. V. Magdysyuk, F. Adams, H.-P. Liermann, I. Spanopoulos, P. N. Trikalitis, M. Hirscher, R. E. Morris, M. J. Duncan, L. J. McCormick, R. E. Dinnebier

2014-09-17 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C4CP03298E

Entropy reduction in unfolded peptides (and proteins) due to conformational preferences of amino acid residues

Reinhard Schweitzer-Stenner, Siobhan E. Toal

2014-09-09 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C4CP02108H

Capture of heliophobic atoms by 4He nanodroplets: the case of cesium

Antonio Leal, David Mateo, Alberto Hernando, Martí Pi, Manuel Barranco

2014-09-22 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C4CP03297G

High performance n-type and ambipolar small organic semiconductors for organic thin film transistors

Huanli Dong, Hao-li Zhang, Wenping Hu

2014-06-26 Perspective

DOI: 10.1039/C4CP01700E

Diffusive and non-diffusive photo-induced proton coupled electron transfer from hydrogen bonded phenols to meso-tetrakis-5,10,15,20-pentafluorophenyl porphyrin

P. Hemant Kumar, Y. Venkatesh, S. Prashanthi, D. Siva, B. Ramakrishna, Prakriti Ranjan Bangal

2014-09-09 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C4CP02505A

Hydrogen-bond memory and water-skin supersolidity resolving the Mpemba paradox

Yongli Huang, Zengsheng Ma, Yichun Zhou, Ji Zhou, Weitao Zheng, Qing Jiang, Chang Q. Sun

2014-09-09 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C4CP03669G

Contents list

Front/Back Matter

DOI: 10.1039/C4CP90142H

You might also like

Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for N-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-2-pyridinamine (CAS: 52818-63-0)?

N-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-2-pyridinamine (CAS: 52818-63-0) is increasingly being used ...

52818-63-0N-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling Ethyl 4-(2-chlorophenyl)-1,3-thiazole-2-carboxylate (CAS: 1050507-06-6)?

When handling Ethyl 4-(2-chlorophenyl)-1,3-thiazole-2-carboxylate, appropriate p...

1050507-06-6Ethyl 4-(2-chlorophe...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to diethyldiselane (CAS: 628-39-7)?

Diethyldiselane (CAS: 628-39-7) is classified under the Globally Harmonized Syst...

628-39-7Diethyldiselane
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for oxocopper (CAS: 12053-18-8)?

The market for oxocopper (CAS: 12053-18-8) is primarily driven by its use in cat...

12053-18-8oxocopper; oxo-(oxoc...
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for 5-{[(2-Methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}-5-azaspiro[2.4]heptane-7-carboxylic acid?

The market for 5-{[(2-Methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}-5-azaspiro[2.4]heptane-7-c...

1268519-54-55-{[(2-Methyl-2-prop...
Compound Q&A

What is 2-(1-Pyrrolidinyl)-4-pyridinamine (CAS: 35981-63-6)?

2-(1-Pyrrolidinyl)-4-pyridinamine is a chemical compound with the CAS number 359...

35981-63-62-(1-Pyrrolidinyl)-4...
Compound Q&A

What are the physical and chemical properties of 2-(3-Pyridinyl)-1-azabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (CAS: 91556-75-1)?

2-(3-Pyridinyl)-1-azabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (CAS: 91556-75-1) is a crystalline sol...

91556-75-12-(3-Pyridinyl)-1-az...
Compound Q&A

How is (S)-Alpha-allyl-proline hydrochloride (CAS: 129704-91-2) typically synthesized?

(S)-Alpha-allyl-proline hydrochloride is usually synthesized via a Wittig reacti...

129704-91-2(S)-Alpha-allyl-prol...
Compound Q&A

What is 3-Methyl-1,2-oxazole-5-carboxylic acid (CAS: 4857-42-5)?

3-Methyl-1,2-oxazole-5-carboxylic acid (CAS: 4857-42-5) is an organic compound w...

4857-42-53-Methyl-1,2-oxazole...
Compound Q&A

How is Lys-SMCC-DM1 (CAS: 1281816-04-3) typically synthesized?

Lys-SMCC-DM1 is synthesized via a multi-step process involving the coupling of S...

1281816-04-3Lys-SMCC-DM1

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.