Interfacial structure in the liquid–liquid extraction of rare earth elements by phosphoric acid ligands: a molecular dynamics study

Literature Information

Publication Date 2020-02-05
DOI 10.1039/C9CP05719F
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Balarama Sridhar Dwadasi, Sriram Goverapet Srinivasan, Beena Rai


View Original

Abstract

Solvent extraction (SX), wherein two immiscible liquids, one containing the extractant molecules and the other containing the solute to be extracted are brought in contact to effect the phase transfer of the solute, underpins metal extraction and recovery processes. The interfacial region is of utmost importance in the SX process, since besides thermodynamics, the physical and chemical heterogeneity at the interface governs the kinetics of the process. Yet, a fundamental understanding of this heterogeneity and its implications for the extraction mechanism are currently lacking. We use molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to study the liquid–liquid interface under conditions relevant to the SX of Rare Earth Elements (REEs) by a phosphoric acid ligand. Simulations revealed that the extractant molecules and varying amounts of acid and metal ions partitioned to the interface. The presence of these species had a significant effect on the interfacial thickness, hydrogen bond life times and orientations of the water molecules at the interface. Deprotonation of the ligands was essential for the adsorption of the metal ions at the interface, with these ions forming a number of different complexes at the interface involving one to three extractant molecules and four to eight water molecules. Although the interface itself was rough, no obvious ‘finger-like’ water protrusions penetrating the organic phase were seen in our simulations. While the results of our work help us gain fundamental insights into the sequence of events leading to the formation of a variety of interfacial complexes, they also emphasize the need to carry out a more detailed atomic level study to understand the full mechanism of extraction of REEs from the aqueous to organic phases by phosphoric acid ligands.

Related Literature

The solid-state Ag/AgCl process as a highly sensitive detection mechanism for an electrochemical immunosensor

Boon Ping Ting, Jie Zhang, Majad Khan, Yi Yan Yang, Jackie Y. Ying

2009-09-01 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B910730D

Intramolecular base-accelerated radical-scavenging reaction of a planar catechin derivative bearing a lysine moiety

Kiyoshi Fukuhara, Kei Ohkubo, Yoshinori Obara, Ayako Tada, Kohei Imai, Akiko Ohno, Asao Nakamura, Shiro Urano, Shinichi Saito, Shunichi Fukuzumi, Kazunori Anzai, Haruhiro Okuda

2009-09-14 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B913714A

Efficient synthesis of dendrimersvia a thiol–yne and esterification process and their potential application in the delivery of platinum anti-cancer drugs

Gaojian Chen, Jatin Kumar, Andrew Gregory, Martina H. Stenzel

2009-09-04 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B910340F

Self-standing, metal nanoparticle embedded transparent films from multi-armed cardanol conjugates through in situ synthesis

Kuthanapillil Jyothish, Praveen Kumar Vemula, Swapnil R. Jadhav, Lynn C. Francesconi, George John

2009-06-08 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B900208A

Exopolyhedral ligand flipping on isomerisation of novel supraicosahedral stannacarboranes

Peter D. Abram, David Ellis, Georgina M. Rosair, Alan J. Welch

2009-08-14 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B911350A

Inside front cover

Front/Back Matter

DOI: 10.1039/B919125A

Two guest complexation modes in a cyclotriveratrylene-based molecular container

Ming-Jhe Li, Chien-Chen Lai, Yi-Hung Liu, Shie-Ming Peng, Sheng-Hsien Chiu

2009-06-29 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B906075H

Front cover

Cover

DOI: 10.1039/B919569F

Hierarchical γ-Al2O3 monoliths with highly ordered 2D hexagonal mesopores in macroporous walls

Le-Le Li, Wen-Tao Duan, Quan Yuan, Zhen-Xing Li, Hao-Hong Duan, Chun-Hua Yan

2009-09-10 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B912495K

You might also like

Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling lithium chloride hydrate (1:1:1) (CAS: 16712-20-2)?

When handling lithium chloride hydrate (1:1:1) (CAS: 16712-20-2), it is importan...

16712-20-2Lithium chloride hyd...
Compound Q&A

Is 4-(4H-1,2,4-Triazol-4-yl)piperidine (CAS: 690261-92-8) safe?

4-(4H-1,2,4-Triazol-4-yl)piperidine is generally considered safe for use in phar...

690261-92-84-(4H-1,2,4-Triazol-...
Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 1,3-Thiazole-2-carboxamide (CAS: 16733-85-0) be handled?

Waste containing 1,3-Thiazole-2-carboxamide (CAS: 16733-85-0) should be collecte...

16733-85-01,3-Thiazole-2-carbo...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 5-(Difluoromethyl)-2-fluorobenzonitrile (CAS: 934175-58-3)?

5-(Difluoromethyl)-2-fluorobenzonitrile (CAS: 934175-58-3) is subject to regulat...

934175-58-35-(Difluoromethyl)-2...
Compound Q&A

How is Methyl 3-acetamido-2-thiophenecarboxylate (CAS: 22288-79-5) typically synthesized?

Methyl 3-acetamido-2-thiophenecarboxylate can be synthesized by the reaction of ...

22288-79-5Methyl 3-acetamido-2...
Compound Q&A

What is 4-Isoquinolinecarbonitrile (CAS: 34846-65-6)?

4-Isoquinolinecarbonitrile is a chemical compound with the CAS number 34846-65-6...

34846-65-64-Isoquinolinecarbon...
Compound Q&A

How should Methyl 1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (CAS: 877309-59-6) be stored?

Store Methyl 1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (CAS: 877309-59-6) in a cool, dry p...

877309-59-6Methyl 1H-1,2,3-tria...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 6-Bromo[1,3]thiazolo[5,4-b]pyridin-2-amine (CAS: 1160791-13-8)?

6-Bromo[1,3]thiazolo[5,4-b]pyridin-2-amine (CAS: 1160791-13-8) is subject to the...

1160791-13-86-Bromo[1,3]thiazolo...
Compound Q&A

Is (2S,3S)-2-Ammonio-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-hydroxypropanoate (CAS: 23651-95-8) safe?

(2S,3S)-2-Ammonio-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-hydroxypropanoate (CAS: 23651-95-8) ...

23651-95-8(2S,3S)-2-Ammonio-3-...
Compound Q&A

What are the physical and chemical properties of 7-bromo-3-methyl-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-4-one (CAS: 1293987-84-4)?

7-Bromo-3-methyl-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-4-one is a solid with a crystalline form....

1293987-84-47-bromo-3-methyl-3,4...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.