Comparative density functional theory–density functional tight binding study of fullerene derivatives: effects due to fullerene size, addends, and crystallinity on band structure, charge transport and optical properties

Literature Information

Publication Date 2017-10-04
DOI 10.1039/C7CP05290A
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Amrita Pal, Lai Kai Wen, Chia Yao Jun, Il Jeon, Yutaka Matsuo, Sergei Manzhos


View Original

Abstract

We present a systematic comparative density functional theory–density functional tight binding study of multiple derivatives of C60 and C70 with different addends, in molecular as well as solid state. In particular, effects due to fullerene size, type and number of addends, and of crystallinity on band structure, charge transport, and optical properties are investigated. These are important, in particular, for rational selection of fullerene derivatives as acceptor and electron transport layers in organic as well as planar inverted perovskite solar cells. We find that by the choice of type and number of addends, one can modulate the LUMO within 0.4 eV. Changes in the HOMO can reach 0.7 eV. Substituting C70 for C60 results in destabilization of the HOMO by about 0.1 eV for indene and quinodimethane addends and by a less significant amount for PCBM addends. The effect of C70–C60 substitution on the LUMO is of similar magnitude. A more significant change in HOMO–LUMO energy is seen for the aryl addends. On the other hand, all C70 based molecules have strong visible absorption. For most addends, the crystal packing leads to a stabilization of both the LUMO and HOMO by about ∼0.2 and ∼0.1 eV, respectively, vs. single molecules. When using bis-addends, it is also possible to enhance the visible absorption. Electron and hole transport rates are computed to vary vastly depending on the addends chosen; specifically, we compute that indene and quimodimethane addends can enhance charge transport rates while the aryl addend is predicted to result in substantially smaller mobilities of electrons and holes, vs. PC60BM. Furthermore, the –CH2 and bisaddend addition can significantly enhance the charge transfer rates for the PCBM addend.

Related Literature

Perylene-diimide for organic solar cells: current scenario and prospects in molecular geometric, functionalization, and optoelectronic properties

Pachaiyappan Murugan, Ezhakudiayan Ravindran, Vajjiram Sangeetha, Shi-Yong Liu

2023-11-14 Review Article

DOI: 10.1039/D3TA04925F

Solvation structure regulation of an organic small molecule additive for dendrite-free aqueous zinc-ion batteries

Xiaomin Li, Jinwei Miao, Fulong Hu, Kang Yan, Lin Song, Huiqing Fan, Longtao Ma, Weijia Wang

2023-11-27 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3TA05814J

Tailoring the supramolecular interaction of ionic liquids for high-sensitivity temperature monitoring under high pressure

Beihang Xu, Yao An, Xinjia Zheng, Zhiwu Chen, Zhaoxiang Yang, Yongjia Yang, An Zhang, Yapei Wang, Yonglin He

2023-11-17 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3TA05615E

Synthesis of stretchable hybrid copper films via nanoconfinement

Zekun Wang, Qiao Gu, Yonghong Deng

2023-11-22 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3TA04958B

Integrated 3D modeling unravels the measures to mitigate nickel migration in solid oxide fuel/electrolysis cells

Zhenjun Jiao, Yunpeng Su, Wenyue Yang, Jianli Zhou, Jin Zhang, Yijing Shang, Ming Chen

2023-11-21 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3TA06563D

Switching the adsorption sites of PMS on SrCoO2.52 to enhance catalytic performance

Jiahong He, Qiang Xu, Bin Xiang

2023-11-21 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3TA06102G

Correction: Accelerating materials discovery using integrated deep machine learning approaches

Weiyi Xia, Ling Tang, Huaijun Sun, Chao Zhang, Kai-Ming Ho

2023-12-06 Correction

DOI: 10.1039/D3TA90266H

Suppressing pre-aggregation to increase polymer solar cell ink shelf life

Zhen Wang, Zhengxing Peng, Nrup Balar, Harald Ade

2023-11-02 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/D3TA06617G

You might also like

Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 2-Ethyl-4-Methyl-1H-Imidazole-5-Carbaldehyde (CAS: 88634-80-4) be handled?

Waste containing 2-Ethyl-4-Methyl-1H-Imidazole-5-Carbaldehyde (CAS: 88634-80-4) ...

88634-80-42-Ethyl-4-Methyl-1H-...
Compound Q&A

What industries use Triethoxy(octyl)silane (CAS: 1385031-14-0)?

Triethoxy(octyl)silane (CAS: 1385031-14-0) is widely used in the pharmaceuticals...

1385031-14-0Triethoxy(octyl)sila...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to 3-iodo-7-nitro-1H-indazole (CAS: 864724-64-1) in synthesis?

Several alternatives to 3-iodo-7-nitro-1H-indazole (CAS: 864724-64-1) exist in t...

864724-64-13-iodo-7-nitro-1H-in...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to Benzene, bis[(trimethoxysilyl)ethyl] (CAS: 266317-71-9) in synthesis?

Yes, there are alternatives to Benzene, bis[(trimethoxysilyl)ethyl] (CAS: 266317...

266317-71-9Benzene, bis[(trimet...
Compound Q&A

Is Isothiazole-3-carbonitrile (CAS: 1452-17-1) safe?

Isothiazole-3-carbonitrile (CAS: 1452-17-1) is generally considered safe when us...

1452-17-1Isothiazole-3-carbon...
Compound Q&A

Is (3-Chlorophenyl)methanol (CAS: 873-63-2) safe?

(3-Chlorophenyl)methanol (CAS: 873-63-2) is considered low to moderately toxic. ...

873-63-2(3-Chlorophenyl)meth...
Compound Q&A

How is (2S,3S)-2-Hydroxy-3-({[(2-methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}amino)-3-(2-naphthyl)propanoic acid (CAS: 959583-98-3) typically synthesized?

(2S,3S)-2-Hydroxy-3-({[(2-methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}amino)-3-(2-naphthyl)pr...

959583-98-3(2S,3S)-2-Hydroxy-3-...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling Methyl 2-(bromomethyl)-5-methoxybenzoate (CAS: 788081-99-2)?

Proper handling of methyl 2-(bromomethyl)-5-methoxybenzoate requires the use of ...

788081-99-2Methyl 2-(bromomethy...
Compound Q&A

What is 6,8-Dibromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-2-carboxylic acid (CAS: 904805-36-3)?

6,8-Dibromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-2-carboxylic acid (CAS: 904805-36-3) is an aro...

904805-36-36,8-Dibromoimidazo[1...
Compound Q&A

Is 3-Amino-5-bromo-2-pyridinecarbonitrile (CAS: 573675-27-1) safe?

3-Amino-5-bromo-2-pyridinecarbonitrile is considered safe when handled under pro...

573675-27-13-Amino-5-bromo-2-py...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.