Quantum mechanical study of the β- and δ-lyase reactions during the base excision repair process: application to FPG

Literature Information

Publication Date 2015-09-02
DOI 10.1039/C5CP04250J
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Shahin Sowlati-Hashjin, Stacey D. Wetmore


View Original

Abstract

Bacterial FPG (or MutM) is a bifunctional DNA glycosylase that is primarily responsible for excising 8-oxoguanine (OG) from the genome by cleaving the glycosidic bond and the DNA backbone at the 3′- and 5′-phosphates of the damaged nucleoside. In the present work, quantum mechanical methods (SMD-M06-2X/6-311+G(2df,2p)//IEF-PCM-B3LYP/6-31G(d)) and a ring-opened Schiff base model that includes both the 3′- and 5′-phosphate groups are used to investigate the β- and δ-elimination reactions facilitated by FPG. Both the β- and δ-elimination reactions are shown to proceed through an E1cB mechanism that involves proton abstraction prior to the phosphate–ribose bond cleavage. Since transition states for the phosphate elimination reactions could not be characterized in the absence of leaving group protonation, our work confirms that the phosphate elimination reactions require protonation by a residue in the FPG active site, and can likely be further activated by additional active-site interactions. Furthermore, our model suggests that 5′-PO4 activation may proceed through a nearly isoenergetic direct (intramolecular) proton transfer involving the O4′ proton of the deoxyribose of the damaged nucleoside. Regardless, our model predicts that both 3′- and 5′-phosphate protonation and elimination steps occur in a concerted reaction. Most importantly, our calculated barriers for the phosphate cleavage reactions reveal inherent differences between the β- and δ-elimination steps. Indeed, our calculations provide a plausible explanation for why the δ-elimination rather than the β-elimination is the rate-determining step in the BER facilitated by FPG, and why some bifunctional glycosylases (including the human counterpart, hOgg1) lack δ-lyase activity. Together, the new mechanistic features revealed by our work can be used in future large-scale modeling of the DNA–protein system to unveil the roles of key active sites residues in these relatively unexplored BER steps.

Related Literature

Study of switching in spin transition compounds within the mechanoelastic model with realistic parameters

Cristian Enachescu, Andreas Hauser

2016-06-29 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP02806C

Structural, optical and photoelectrochemical characterizations of monoclinic Ta3N5 thin films

Sherdil Khan, Maximiliano J. M. Zapata, Marcelo B. Pereira, Renato V. Gonçalves, Lukas Strizik, Jairton Dupont, Marcos J. L. Santos, Sérgio R. Teixeira

2015-08-10 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C5CP03645C

Computational insights into CdSe quantum dots' interactions with acetate ligands

Patrick K. Tamukong, Wadumesthrige D. N. Peiris, Svetlana Kilina

2016-07-04 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP01665K

Synthesis of barbituric acid containing nucleotides and their implications for the origin of primitive informational polymers

Chaitanya V. Mungi, Sachin Kumar Singh, Sudha Rajamani

2016-04-12 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP00686H

Concave or convex π-dimers: the role of the pancake bond in substituted phenalenyl radical dimers

Zhong-hua Cui, Abhinav Gupta, Miklos Kertesz

2015-08-11 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C5CP03759J

100 fs photo-isomerization with vibrational coherences but low quantum yield in Anabaena Sensory Rhodopsin

Alexandre Cheminal, Jérémie Léonard, So-Young Kim, Kwang-Hwan Jung, Hideki Kandori, Stefan Haacke

2015-09-03 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C5CP04353K

Separation of thorium ions from wolframite and scandium concentrates using graphene oxide

Ondřej Jankovský, David Sedmidubský, Petr Šimek, Kateřina Klímová, Daniel Bouša, Chris Boothroyd, Zdeněk Sofer

2015-08-27 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C5CP04384K

You might also like

Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling 4-Methyl-6-(trifluoromethyl)quinoline (CAS: 40716-16-3)?

When handling 4-Methyl-6-(trifluoromethyl)quinoline (CAS: 40716-16-3), safety go...

40716-16-34-Methyl-6-(trifluor...
Compound Q&A

What is 4-(3,5-Difluorophenyl)aniline (CAS: 405058-00-6)?

4-(3,5-Difluorophenyl)aniline is an aromatic organic compound with the CAS numbe...

405058-00-64-(3,5-Difluoropheny...
Compound Q&A

How is 5-{[4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl]sulfanyl}-1,2,3-thiadiazole-4-carboxylic acid (CAS: 338982-07-3) typically synthesized?

5-{[4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl]sulfanyl}-1,2,3-thiadiazole-4-carboxylic acid can ...

338982-07-35-{[4-(Trifluorometh...
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for 4-Benzylaniline hydrochloride (CAS: 6317-57-3)?

The market for 4-Benzylaniline hydrochloride (CAS: 6317-57-3) is steadily growin...

6317-57-34-Benzylaniline hydr...
Compound Q&A

Is [3-(Diethylsulfamoyl)phenyl]boronic acid (CAS: 871329-58-7) safe?

[3-(Diethylsulfamoyl)phenyl]boronic acid is generally considered safe when handl...

871329-58-7[3-(Diethylsulfamoyl...
Compound Q&A

What are the main uses of 3-Bromo-2,5-dimethoxyaniline (CAS: 115929-62-9)?

3-Bromo-2,5-dimethoxyaniline is mainly used in the pharmaceutical and chemical i...

115929-62-93-Bromo-2,5-dimethox...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to N-Methyl-1-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanamine (CAS: 915922-67-7)?

N-Methyl-1-(5-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanamine (CAS: 915922-67-7) is subject to ...

915922-67-7N-Methyl-1-(5-methyl...
Compound Q&A

What industries use Carbamic acid, N-[(5S)-5,6-diamino-6-oxohexyl]-, 1,1-dimethylethyl ester (CAS: 24828-96-4)?

This compound is primarily used in the pharmaceutical industry for the synthesis...

24828-96-4Carbamic acid, N-[(5...
Compound Q&A

How should 2-Methyl-2-propanyl [(1S,3R)-3-aminocyclohexyl]carbamate (CAS: 1298101-47-9) be stored?

2-Methyl-2-propanyl [(1S,3R)-3-aminocyclohexyl]carbamate (CAS: 1298101-47-9) sho...

1298101-47-92-Methyl-2-propanyl ...
Compound Q&A

What industries use Ethyl 2-bromo-4,4,4-trifluorobutanoate (CAS: 367-33-9)?

Ethyl 2-bromo-4,4,4-trifluorobutanoate (CAS: 367-33-9) is utilized in the pharma...

367-33-9Ethyl 2-bromo-4,4,4-...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.