Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 with functionalized gold and molecularly imprinted polymeric nanoparticles: a mini review
Literature Information
Pankaj Singla, Harpreet Kaur, Saweta Garg, Navalpreet Kaur, Francesco Canfarotta, Rakesh Kumar Mahajan, Marloes Peeters
The novel coronavirus COVID-19 was first reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and rapidly spread to the rest of the world, with the WHO declaring a global pandemic in March 2020. Rapid mutations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have challenged its diagnosis and treatments. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests are widely used for the diagnosis of COVID-19; however, they present several drawbacks including high cost, long turnaround time, and need for sophisticated lab infrastructure and trained technical personnel. Lateral flow tests based on antigen sensing are an interesting alternative since they offer rapid (15–30 min) and low-cost analysis, although their low sensitivity has led to several adopted tests being withdrawn from the market. Henceforth, the development of detection methods which are fast, robust, reliable, cost-effective, easy to use and portable is indispensable to prevent community transmission of COVID-19. We have reviewed two different emerging colloidal-based methodologies, (a) functionalized gold nanoparticles (functionalized AuNPs) and (b) molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), for fast, highly specific, and reliable identification of SARS-CoV-2. Different modifications of AuNPs with antibodies, antigens and nucleoproteins and their various assays including colorimetric, electrochemical, localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) and lateral flow immunoassays are discussed. In contrast, with MIP-based sensors, various antigen proteins and virus particles can be imprinted within the polymeric nanoplatform and hence can be detected with various readout techniques. The operating characteristics of these two emerging diagnostic platforms were critically reviewed and compared against each other.
Related Literature
Thermodiffusion of citrate-coated γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles in aqueous dispersions with tuned counter-ions – anisotropy of the Soret coefficient under a magnetic field
M. Kouyaté, G. Demouchy, G. Mériguet, S. Nakamae, V. Peyre, M. Roger, A. Cēbers, J. Depeyrot, E. Dubois, R. Perzynski
DOI: 10.1039/C8CP06858E
Impact of H-termination on the nitrogen reduction reaction of molybdenum carbide as an electrochemical catalyst
Qinye Li, Siyao Qiu, Lizhong He, Xiwang Zhang
DOI: 10.1039/C8CP04474K
Charge percolation in redox-active thin membrane hybrids of mesoporous silica and poly(viologens)
Simón Saint-André, Federico Albanese
DOI: 10.1039/C8CP07192F
Swelling behaviour of core–shell microgels in H2O, analysed by temperature-dependent FTIR spectroscopy
Lars Wiehemeier, Oliver Wrede, Julian Oberdisse, Thomas Hellweg, Tilman Kottke
DOI: 10.1039/C8CP05911J
Evolution of optical properties and electronic structures: band gaps and critical points in MgxZn1−xO (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.2) thin films
Yue-Jie Shi, Rong-Jun Zhang, Xin Chen, Lei Wang, Lei Chen, Qing-Hua Huang, Da-Hai Li, Yu-Xiang Zheng, Song-You Wang, Ning Dai, Liang-Yao Chen
DOI: 10.1039/C8CP04942D
Extending the perturbed matrix method beyond the dipolar approximation: comparison of different levels of theory
Laura Zanetti-Polzi, Sara Del Galdo, Isabella Daidone, Marco D'Abramo, Vincenzo Barone, Massimiliano Aschi, Andrea Amadei
DOI: 10.1039/C8CP04190C
Diagnosing the plasma formed during acoustic cavitation in [BEPip][NTf2] ionic liquid
Rachel Pflieger, Manuel Lejeune, Cédric Noel, Thierry Belmonte, Sergey I. Nikitenko, Micheline Draye
DOI: 10.1039/C8CP06967K
In situ XPS analysis of the atomic layer deposition of aluminium oxide on titanium dioxide
Robert H. Temperton, Andrew Gibson, James N. O'Shea
DOI: 10.1039/C8CP06912C
Doping effect of transition metals (Zr, Mn, Ti and Ni) on well-shaped CuO/CeO2(rods): nano/micro structure and catalytic performance for selective oxidation of CO in excess H2
Xiaolin Guo, Zhihuan Qiu, Jianxin Mao, Renxian Zhou
DOI: 10.1039/C8CP03696A
You might also like
Are there alternatives to 1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-N-hydroxymethanimine (CAS: 3848-36-0) in synthesis?
When considering alternatives to 1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-N-hydroxymethanimine (CAS: 3...
How should (1R,9S,10S,12S,14E,16S,19R,20R,21S,22R)-3,9,21-Trihydroxy-5,10,12,14,16,20,22-heptamethyl-23,24-dioxatetracyclo[17.3.1.1~6,9~.0~2,7~]tetracosa-2,5,7,14-tetraen-4-one (CAS: 183202-73-5) be stored?
This compound should be stored in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight. I...
How is 3-(4-Bromophenyl)-5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazole (CAS: 419553-16-5) typically synthesized?
3-(4-Bromophenyl)-5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazole is synthesized through a m...
How is 5-Chloro-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-methyl-6-[3-(1-piperidinyl)propoxy]pyrimidine (CAS: 1639220-19-1) typically synthesized?
5-Chloro-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-methyl-6-[3-(1-piperidinyl)propoxy]pyrimidine (CAS...
What industries use 2-Chloro-4-(difluoromethoxy)pyridine (CAS: 1206978-15-5)?
2-Chloro-4-(difluoromethoxy)pyridine is used in the pharmaceutical industry for ...
What regulatory guidelines apply to 3-Chloro-6-methylpyridazine (CAS: 1121-79-5)?
3-Chloro-6-methylpyridazine (CAS: 1121-79-5) is classified under the Globally Ha...
Are there alternatives to Methyl 4,5-dimethyl-2-nitrobenzoate in synthesis?
Several alternatives can be used in the synthesis of Methyl 4,5-dimethyl-2-nitro...
Are there alternatives to (2E,2'E)-3,3'-(1,4-Phenylene)bisacrylaldehyde in synthesis?
Alternatives to (2E,2'E)-3,3'-(1,4-Phenylene)bisacrylaldehyde include other acry...
What is 3-Amino-5-chloropyridin-2-ol hydrochloride (CAS: 1261906-29-9)?
3-Amino-5-chloropyridin-2-ol hydrochloride is an organic compound with the CAS n...
What precautions should be taken when handling 6,7-Difluoro-2,3-dihydro-4H-chromen-4-one (CAS: 1092349-93-3)?
When handling 6,7-Difluoro-2,3-dihydro-4H-chromen-4-one, it is essential to wear...















