Insights into the scalability of catalytic upgrading of biomass pyrolysis vapors using micro and bench-scale reactors

Literature Information

Publication Date 2020-05-15
DOI 10.1039/D0SE00303D
Impact Factor 6.367
Authors

Andreas Eschenbacher, Alireza Saraeian, Brent H. Shanks, Peter Arendt Jensen, Ulrik Birk Henriksen, Jesper Ahrenfeldt, Anker Degn Jensen


View Original

Abstract

Despite a vast body of literature dedicated to catalyst screening using micro-scale reactor systems for the catalytic deoxygenation of biomass-derived fast pyrolysis vapors, the quantitative scalability of the results obtained at the microscale to a continuous industrial process remains questionable. In this work, the product yields from ex situ vapor upgrading in a micro-pyrolyzer utilizing mg quantities of catalysts and a bench-scale system using ∼100 g of the catalyst and continuous biomass feeding are compared for nine different catalysts in an inert atmosphere and three different hydrodeoxygenation catalysts in a hydrogen-containing atmosphere. Besides the comparison of product yields, important quality parameters of the bio-oil collected at the bench-scale such as oxygen content, TAN, molar H/C and O/C ratio, effective hydrogen index (EHI), and higher heating value (HHV) were compared with the properties of the non-condensed vapors detected at the micro-scale. A higher deoxygenation severity and HHV and higher yields of CO and light hydrocarbons (both alkanes and alkenes) were measured at the bench-scale compared to the micro-scale. Catalytic vapor upgrading at the bench-scale produced ∼125% more coke per catalyst surface area compared to the micro-pyrolyzer studies, and generally for acidic catalysts tested under an inert atmosphere the yield of aromatics was higher for bench-Py tests compared to μ-Py tests. These differences are attributed to the approximately two orders of magnitude higher catalyst mass/gas flow rate ratios (W/F) applied at the bench-scale compared to the micro-scale, resulting in higher conversions over the catalytic bed and likely additional secondary cracking reactions. At both scales, with an increasing amount of pyrolysis vapors fed over the catalyst the yield of deoxygenated products (aliphatics and monoaromatics) decreased and the selectivity for BTX products decreased when using HZSM-5 containing catalysts. Trends in product selectivity towards aliphatics or aromatics observed for the HDO catalysts tested with the micropyrolyzer agreed with the properties of bio-oil from bench-scale tests. The estimation of the oxygen-content and EHI of the non-condensed vapors at the micro-scale can serve as an indicator for the charring propensity and thus the chemical reactivity of bio-oils obtained at larger scales. Overall, this contribution addresses the implications to consider when applying results obtained at the microscale for catalytic upgrading of fast pyrolysis vapors under an inert or hydrogen-containing atmosphere for predicting the process behavior on a large continuous scale.

Related Literature

Engineering of pH-triggered nanoplatforms based on novel poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline)-b-poly[2-(diisopropylamino)ethyl methacrylate] diblock copolymers with tunable morphologies for biomedical applications

Peter Černoch, Alessandro Jager, Zulfiya Černochová, Vladimir Sincari, Lindomar J. C. Albuquerque, Rafal Konefal, Ewa Pavlova, Fernando C. Giacomelli, Eliezer Jager

2021-04-14 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D1PY00141H

Efficient synthesis of discrete oligo(fluorenediacetylene)s toward chain-length-dependent optical and structural properties

Xianheng Shi, Min Liu, Lishan Li, Jiandong Zhang, Haiyan Li, Zhihao Huang, Wei Zhang, Zhengbiao Zhang, Nianchen Zhou, Xiulin Zhu

2021-03-31 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D1PY00165E

Amphiphilic poly(ether urethanes) carrying associative terpyridine side groups with controlled spacing

Katharina Breul, Sebastian Seiffert

2021-03-23 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D1PY00121C

Novel imino- and aryl-sulfonate based photoacid generators for the cationic ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone

Xabier Lopez de Pariza, Nicolas Zivic, Fernando Ruipérez, Timothy E. Long, Haritz Sardon

2021-06-30 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D1PY00734C

Introducing a 1,1-diphenylethylene analogue for vinylpyridine: anionic copolymerisation of 3-(1-phenylvinyl)pyridine (m-PyPE)

Marcel Fickenscher, Tom Reimers, Holger Frey

2021-05-31 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D1PY00302J

Polymer defect engineering – conductive 2D organic platelets from precise thiophene-doped polyethylene

Oksana Suraeva, Beomjin Jeong, Kamal Asadi, Katharina Landfester, Ingo Lieberwirth

2021-03-02 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D1PY00117E

Front cover

2021-06-29 Cover

DOI: 10.1039/D1PY90088A

Composition processing property relationship of vitrimers Based on polyethyleneimine

Natanel Jarach, Daniel Golani, Ofer Asaf, Hanna Dodiuk, Yoav Shamir, Amir Goldbourt, Samuel Kenig, Naum Naveh

2021-04-06 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D1PY00116G

You might also like

Compound Q&A

What industries use (1R,3S)-1,3-Cyclopentanediol (CAS: 16326-97-9)?

(1R,3S)-1,3-Cyclopentanediol finds applications in various industries. In the ph...

16326-97-9(1R,3S)-1,3-Cyclopen...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling N'-[4-(Dimethylamino)phenyl]-N,N-dimethyl-1,4-benzenediamine (CAS: 637-31-0)?

When handling N'-[4-(Dimethylamino)phenyl]-N,N-dimethyl-1,4-benzenediamine, it i...

637-31-0N'-[4-(Dimethylamino...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to 5-(2,4-Difluorophenyl)-2-methoxypyrimidine (CAS: 1352318-16-1) in synthesis?

There are several alternatives to 5-(2,4-Difluorophenyl)-2-methoxypyrimidine in ...

1352318-16-15-(2,4-Difluoropheny...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 1-(3-Methoxyphenoxy)propan-2-ol (CAS: 382141-68-6)?

1-(3-Methoxyphenoxy)propan-2-ol (CAS: 382141-68-6) must comply with the Globally...

382141-68-61-(3-Methoxyphenoxy)...
Compound Q&A

Is Tetrodotoxin Citrate (CAS: 18660-81-6) safe?

Tetrodotoxin Citrate is extremely dangerous and should be handled with extreme c...

18660-81-6Tetrodotoxin Citrate
Compound Q&A

What are the main uses of 2-Methyl-2-propanyl [(1R,3S)-3-hydroxycyclopentyl]carbamate (CAS: 225641-84-9)?

2-Methyl-2-propanyl [(1R,3S)-3-hydroxycyclopentyl]carbamate (CAS: 225641-84-9) i...

225641-84-92-Methyl-2-propanyl ...
Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 4-(2-Hydroxyhexafluoroisopropyl)Benzoic Acid (CAS: 16261-80-6) be handled?

Waste containing 4-(2-Hydroxyhexafluoroisopropyl)Benzoic Acid (CAS: 16261-80-6) ...

16261-80-64-(2-Hydroxyhexafluo...
Compound Q&A

How is 2-Methyl-2-proanyl {(2S)-1-[(benzyloxy)amino]-3-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-oxo-2-butanyl}carbamate (CAS: 102507-19-7) typically synthesized?

2-Methyl-2-proanyl {(2S)-1-[(benzyloxy)amino]-3-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-oxo-2-butanyl...

102507-19-72-Methyl-2-propanyl ...
Compound Q&A

What is Benzeneethanamine, α-ethyl-, hydrochloride (1:1) (CAS: 20735-15-3)?

Benzeneethanamine, α-ethyl-, hydrochloride (1:1) is an organic compound with the...

20735-15-3Benzeneethanamine, α...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to 3-{(E)-[4-(Dimethylamino)phenyl]diazenyl}benzoic acid (CAS: 20691-84-3) in synthesis?

In the synthesis of compounds similar to 3-{(E)-[4-(Dimethylamino)phenyl]diazeny...

20691-84-33-{(E)-[4-(Dimethyla...
Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.