Reaction-field electrostatics in molecular dynamics simulations: development of a conservative scheme compatible with an atomic cutoff

Literature Information

Publication Date 2020-10-14
DOI 10.1039/D0CP03835K
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Alžbeta Kubincová, Sereina Riniker, Philippe H. Hünenberger


View Original

Abstract

In molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of condensed-phase systems, straight-cutoff truncation of the non-bonded interactions is well known to cause cutoff noise and serious artifacts in many simulated properties. These effects can be drastically reduced by applying the truncation based on distances between neutral charge groups (CG) rather than between individual atoms (AT). In addition, the mean effect of the omitted electrostatic interactions beyond the cutoff distance can be reintroduced using the reaction-field (RF) method, where the medium outside the cutoff sphere is approximated as a dielectric continuum of permittivity equal to that of the solvent. The RF scheme is generally applied with CG truncation. This is justified for low solvent permittivities, where the RF correction is small and an AT truncation would lead to severe issues, just as in the straight-cutoff case. However, it is less appropriate for solvents with high permittivities, where the RF correction acts as a physically motivated shifting function, and a CG truncation may in turn lead to artifacts and poorer energy conservation. In this study, we assess the impact of truncation artifacts considering the 57 organic liquids which were used in the calibration of the GROMOS-compatible 2016H66 force field. Combinations of shifting or switching schemes with RF-based electrostatic interactions as well as van der Waals (Lennard-Jones) interactions are then introduced to resolve the issues with AT truncation. These shifting and switching schemes have the following properties: (i) they bring the force but not the potential energy to zero at the cutoff; (ii) as a result, they lead to a modification of the interaction that is comparatively small; (iii) they permit to conduct rigorously conservative simulations; (iv) the energies can easily be corrected back to the unmodified form, either on the fly or in a post-processing step. The mathematical formalism of these schemes is presented in detail, and their validation is performed using the 57 organic liquids.

Related Literature

Bifunctional polyacrylamide based polymers for the specific binding of hexahistidine tagged proteins on gold surfaces

Lucas B. Thompson, Nathan H. Mack, Ralph G. Nuzzo

2009-12-04 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B920713A

Synthesis and characterization of RuO2/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) composite nanotubes for supercapacitors

Ran Liu, Jonathon Duay, Timothy Lane

2010-01-18 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B918589P

From nanocrystal synthesis to functional nanostructure fabrication: laser ablation in liquid

P. Liu, H. Cui, C. X. Wang, G. W. Yang

2010-03-12 Perspective

DOI: 10.1039/B918759F

Nature of proton dynamics in a polymer electrolyte membrane, nafion: a first-principles molecular dynamics study

Yoong-Kee Choe, Eiji Tsuchida, Tamio Ikeshoji, Shunsuke Yamakawa, Shi-aki Hyodo

2009-03-14 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B819535H

Proton transfer in adsorbed water dimers

Xiao Liang Hu, Jiří Klimeš, Angelos Michaelides

2010-02-25 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B924422K

Inside front cover

Front/Back Matter

DOI: 10.1039/C004644M

Spectral shifts of matrix isolated species as criteria for acid–base interactions with solid Xe

Mark Rozenberg, Aharon Loewenschuss, Claus Jørgen Nielsen

2010-03-12 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B922952C

You might also like

Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 2-Ethyl-4-Methyl-1H-Imidazole-5-Carbaldehyde (CAS: 88634-80-4) be handled?

Waste containing 2-Ethyl-4-Methyl-1H-Imidazole-5-Carbaldehyde (CAS: 88634-80-4) ...

88634-80-42-Ethyl-4-Methyl-1H-...
Compound Q&A

What industries use Triethoxy(octyl)silane (CAS: 1385031-14-0)?

Triethoxy(octyl)silane (CAS: 1385031-14-0) is widely used in the pharmaceuticals...

1385031-14-0Triethoxy(octyl)sila...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to 3-iodo-7-nitro-1H-indazole (CAS: 864724-64-1) in synthesis?

Several alternatives to 3-iodo-7-nitro-1H-indazole (CAS: 864724-64-1) exist in t...

864724-64-13-iodo-7-nitro-1H-in...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to Benzene, bis[(trimethoxysilyl)ethyl] (CAS: 266317-71-9) in synthesis?

Yes, there are alternatives to Benzene, bis[(trimethoxysilyl)ethyl] (CAS: 266317...

266317-71-9Benzene, bis[(trimet...
Compound Q&A

Is Isothiazole-3-carbonitrile (CAS: 1452-17-1) safe?

Isothiazole-3-carbonitrile (CAS: 1452-17-1) is generally considered safe when us...

1452-17-1Isothiazole-3-carbon...
Compound Q&A

Is (3-Chlorophenyl)methanol (CAS: 873-63-2) safe?

(3-Chlorophenyl)methanol (CAS: 873-63-2) is considered low to moderately toxic. ...

873-63-2(3-Chlorophenyl)meth...
Compound Q&A

How is (2S,3S)-2-Hydroxy-3-({[(2-methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}amino)-3-(2-naphthyl)propanoic acid (CAS: 959583-98-3) typically synthesized?

(2S,3S)-2-Hydroxy-3-({[(2-methyl-2-propanyl)oxy]carbonyl}amino)-3-(2-naphthyl)pr...

959583-98-3(2S,3S)-2-Hydroxy-3-...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling Methyl 2-(bromomethyl)-5-methoxybenzoate (CAS: 788081-99-2)?

Proper handling of methyl 2-(bromomethyl)-5-methoxybenzoate requires the use of ...

788081-99-2Methyl 2-(bromomethy...
Compound Q&A

What is 6,8-Dibromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-2-carboxylic acid (CAS: 904805-36-3)?

6,8-Dibromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-2-carboxylic acid (CAS: 904805-36-3) is an aro...

904805-36-36,8-Dibromoimidazo[1...
Compound Q&A

Is 3-Amino-5-bromo-2-pyridinecarbonitrile (CAS: 573675-27-1) safe?

3-Amino-5-bromo-2-pyridinecarbonitrile is considered safe when handled under pro...

573675-27-13-Amino-5-bromo-2-py...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.