Head-to-head comparison of LNA, MPγPNA, INA and Invader probes targeting mixed-sequence double-stranded DNA

Literature Information

Publication Date 2019-10-25
DOI 10.1039/C9OB02111F
Impact Factor 3.876
Authors

Raymond G. Emehiser, Eric Hall, Dale C. Guenther, Saswata Karmakar, Patrick J. Hrdlicka


View Original

Abstract

Four probe chemistries are characterized and compared with respect to thermal denaturation temperatures (Tms), thermodynamic parameters associated with duplex formation, and recognition of mixed-sequence double-stranded (ds) DNA targets: (i) oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ONs) modified with Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) monomers, (ii) MPγPNAs, i.e., single-stranded peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probes that are functionalized at the γ-position with (R)-diethylene glycol (mini-PEG, MP) moieties, (iii) Invader probes, i.e., DNA duplexes modified with +1 interstrand zipper arrangements of 2′-O-(pyren-1-yl)methyl-RNA monomers, and (iv) intercalating nucleic acids (INAs), i.e., DNA duplexes with opposing insertions of 1-O-(1-pyrenylmethyl)glycerol bulges. Invader and INA probes, which are designed to violate the nearest-neighbor exclusion principle, denature readily, whereas the individual probe strands display exceptionally high affinity towards complementary DNA (cDNA) as indicated by increases in Tms of up to 8 °C per modification. Optimized Invader and INA probes enable efficient and highly specific recognition of mixed-sequence dsDNA targets with self-complementary regions (C50 = 30–50 nM), whereas recognition is less efficient with LNA-modified ONs and fully modified MPγPNAs due to lower cDNA affinity (LNA) and a proclivity for dimerization (LNA and MPγPNA). A Cy3-labeled Invader probe is shown to stain telomeric DNA of individual chromosomes in metaphasic spreads under non-denaturing conditions with excellent specificity.

Related Literature

MXene and Xene: promising frontier beyond graphene in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine

Moon Sung Kang, Hee Jeong Jang, Hyo Jung Jo, Iruthayapandi Selestin Raja

2023-11-16 Review Article

DOI: 10.1039/D3NH00428G

A bio-inspired multifunctional interface layer for high performance zinc-ion batteries via novel in situ electropolymerization

Jun Wang, Xiuyang Zou, Lina Song, Jianguo Lu, Xiang Gao, Qinggang He

2023-10-04 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3TA04886A

Frame-by-frame observations of structure fluctuations in single mass-selected Au clusters using aberration-corrected electron microscopy

Cesare Roncaglia, Diana Nelli, El Yakout El Koraychy, Riccardo Ferrando, Thomas J. A. Slater, Richard E. Palmer

2023-10-19 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/D3NH00291H

Nitrogen-rich porous organic polymer as a promising adsorbent for iodine capture from organic solvents

Fatemeh Khosravi Esmaeiltarkhani, Mohammad Dinari, Nazanin Mokhtari

2023-12-26 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ04674E

Building fast and selective Zn ion channels for highly stable quasi-solid-state Zn-ion batteries

Chun-Chuan Kao, Jiahao Liu, Chao Ye, Shao-Jian Zhang, Junnan Hao, Shi-Zhang Qiao

2023-09-30 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3TA02866F

In situ formation of a ZnS/In interphase for reversible Zn metal anodes at ultrahigh currents and capacities

Chengwu Yang, Pattaraporn Woottapanit, Jin Cao, Yilei Yue, Dongdong Zhang, Jin Yi, Zhiyuan Zeng, Xinyu Zhang, Jiaqian Qin, Yonggang Wang

2023-10-31 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3TA05650C

MnP4 electrode for Na-ion batteries: a complex and effective electrochemical mechanism

Julien Fullenwarth, Bernard Fraisse, Nicolas Dupré

2023-10-02 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3TA02329J

Enriching 2D transition metal borides via MB XMenes (M = Fe, Co, Ir): Strong correlation and magnetism

Jiawei Tang, Duo Wang, Jing Zhang, Litao Sun, Baisheng Sa, Bobby G. Sumpter, Jingsong Huang, Weiwei Sun

2023-11-14 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/D3NH00364G

You might also like

Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 6-Bromo-2-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine (CAS: 1111638-05-1)?

6-Bromo-2-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine (CAS: 1111638-05-1) falls under various...

1111638-05-16-Bromo-2-methylimid...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to 1-Pyrrolidineethanol, β-methyl-α-phenyl-, (αS,βR) (CAS: 123620-80-4) in synthesis?

While there are no direct alternatives, similar compounds like 1-Pyrrolidineetha...

123620-80-41-Pyrrolidineethanol...
Compound Q&A

Is 4-Methyl-2,6-bis(2-methyl-2-propanyl)phenyl methylcarbamate (CAS: 1918-11-2) safe?

4-Methyl-2,6-bis(2-methyl-2-propanyl)phenyl methylcarbamate (CAS: 1918-11-2) is ...

1918-11-24-Methyl-2,6-bis(2-m...
Compound Q&A

How should 2-(3-Bromo-4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dioxolane (CAS: 77771-04-1) be stored?

2-(3-Bromo-4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dioxolane (CAS: 77771-04-1) should be stored in a...

77771-04-12-(3-Bromo-4-fluorop...
Compound Q&A

What are the physical and chemical properties of 4,5,6,7-Tetrahydro-1H-indazole hydrochloride (CAS: 18161-11-0)?

4,5,6,7-Tetrahydro-1H-indazole hydrochloride is a white crystalline solid with a...

18161-11-04,5,6,7-Tetrahydro-1...
Compound Q&A

What is (2R)-1-Methoxy-3-phenyl-2-propanamine (CAS: 59919-07-2)?

(2R)-1-Methoxy-3-phenyl-2-propanamine is a chiral organic compound with the CAS ...

59919-07-2(2R)-1-Methoxy-3-phe...
Compound Q&A

What industries use Ethyl 1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate (CAS: 56649-47-9)?

Ethyl 1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate is used in various industries...

56649-47-9Ethyl 1-(1-phenyleth...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 4-[(1E,3S)-1-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-1,4-pentadien-3-yl]phenol (CAS: 17676-24-3)?

4-[(1E,3S)-1-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-1,4-pentadien-3-yl]phenol (CAS: 17676-24-3) falls...

17676-24-34-[(1E,3S)-1-(4-Hydr...
Compound Q&A

What industries use (S)-3-Amino-5-phenylpentanoic acid hydrochloride (CAS: 331846-97-0)?

(S)-3-Amino-5-phenylpentanoic acid hydrochloride is primarily used in the pharma...

331846-97-0(S)-3-Amino-5-phenyl...
Compound Q&A

How is 7-methoxy-1-benzothiophene-2-carboxylic acid (CAS: 88791-07-5) typically synthesized?

7-Methoxy-1-benzothiophene-2-carboxylic acid is typically synthesized by reactin...

88791-07-57-methoxy-1-benzothi...

Source Journal

Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry

Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
CiteScore: 3.4
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 1041

Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry (OBC) publishes original and high impact research and reviews in organic chemistry. We welcome research that shows new or significantly improved protocols or methodologies in total synthesis, synthetic methodology or physical and theoretical organic chemistry as well as research that shows a significant advance in the organic chemistry or molecular design aspects of chemical biology, catalysis, supramolecular and macromolecular chemistry, theoretical chemistry, mechanism-oriented physical organic chemistry, medicinal chemistry or natural products. Articles published in the journal should report new work which makes a highly-significant impact in the field. Routine and incremental work is generally not suitable for publication in the journal. More details about key areas of our scope are below. In all cases authors should include in their article clear rationale for why their research has been carried out.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.