Narrowing the gap between experimental and computational determination of methyl group dynamics in proteins

Literature Information

Publication Date 2018-09-18
DOI 10.1039/C8CP03915A
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Falk Hoffmann, Mengjun Xue, Lars V. Schäfer, Frans A. A. Mulder


View Original

Abstract

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spin relaxation has become the mainstay technique to sample protein dynamics at atomic resolution, expanding its repertoire from backbone 15N to side-chain 2H probes. At the same time, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have become increasingly powerful to study protein dynamics due to steady improvements of physical models, algorithms, and computational power. Good agreement between generalized Lipari–Szabo order parameters derived from experiment and MD simulation has been observed for the backbone dynamics of a number of proteins. However, the agreement for the more dynamic side-chains, as probed by methyl group relaxation, was much worse. Here, we use T4 lysozyme (T4L), a protein with moderate tumbling anisotropy, to showcase a number of improvements that reduce this gap by a combined evaluation of NMR relaxation experiments and MD simulations. By applying a protein force field with accurate methyl group rotation barriers in combination with a solvation model that yields correct protein rotational diffusion times, we find that properly accounting for anisotropic protein tumbling is an important factor to improve the match between NMR and MD in terms of methyl axis order parameters, spectral densities, and relaxation rates. The best agreement with the experimentally measured relaxation rates is obtained by a posteriori fitting the appropriate internal time correlation functions, truncated by anisotropic overall tumbling. In addition, MD simulations led us to account for a hitherto unrealized artifact in deuterium relaxation experiments arising from strong coupling for leucine residues in uniformly 13C-enriched proteins. For T4L, the improved analysis reduced the RMSD between MD and NMR derived methyl axis order parameters from 0.19 to 0.11. At the level of the spectral density functions, the improvements allow us to extract the most accurate parameters that describe protein side-chain dynamics. Further improvement is challenging not only due to force field and sampling limitations in MD, but also due to inherent limitations of the Lipari–Szabo model to capture complex dynamics.

Related Literature

First-principles prediction of the thermal conductivity of two configurations of difluorinated graphene monolayer

Ao Chen, Hua Tong, Cheng-Wei Wu, Shi-Yi Li, Pin-Zhen Jia, Wu-Xing Zhou

2023-11-25 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3CP04923J

Enhancing the upconversion of Er3+ incorporated BaTiO3 by introducing oxygen vacancies

Young Gwon Jung, Hyeongyu Bae, Kang Taek Lee

2023-11-28 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3CP02133E

A minimal kinetic model for the interpretation of complex catalysis in single enzyme molecules

Prasanta Kundu, Soma Saha, Gautam Gangopadhyay

2023-11-21 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3CP01720F

Degradation of NTO induced by superoxide and hydroperoxyl radicals: a comprehensive DFT study

Liudmyla K. Sviatenko, Jerzy Leszczynski

2023-11-29 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3CP05603A

Front cover

2023-12-19 Cover

DOI: 10.1039/D4SE90001D

Photoelectrochemical conversion of glycerol aqueous solution to value-added chemicals using Bi2Fe4O9 as a photoanode

Bruno L. da Silva, Saulo A. Carminati, Matheus B. C. Souza, Leonardo C. Soares, Claudia Longo, Pablo S. Fernández, Ana F. Nogueira

2023-10-18 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3SE01045G

Solvent-controlled synthesis of hydrophilic and hydrophobic carbon dots

Chenhan Zhang, Zhihua Ying, Yuan Jiang, Haiyang Wang, Xuebin Zhou, Weipeng Xuan, Peng Zheng

2023-12-08 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3CP04273A

Differential effects of MoO3 and MoO2 sacrificial layers on the J–V performance of Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 solar cells

Jinhui Zhang, Chuanhe Ma, Haixuan Gao, Jinchun Jiang, Hailong Wang

2023-12-14 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3SE01409F

You might also like

Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 4-Bromo-3-methyl-2-thiophenecarboxylic acid (CAS: 265652-39-9) be handled?

Waste containing 4-Bromo-3-methyl-2-thiophenecarboxylic acid (CAS: 265652-39-9) ...

265652-39-94-Bromo-3-methyl-2-t...
Compound Q&A

What industries use (2S,5S,2'S,5'S)-1,1'-(1,2-Ethanediyl)bis(2,5-dimethylphospholane) (CAS: 136779-26-5)?

(2S,5S,2'S,5'S)-1,1'-(1,2-Ethanediyl)bis(2,5-dimethylphospholane) is primarily u...

136779-26-5(2S,5S,2'S,5'S)-1,1'...
Compound Q&A

What industries use Ethyl 2-(2-bromo-5-fluorophenyl)acetate (CAS: 1214910-61-8)?

Ethyl 2-(2-bromo-5-fluorophenyl)acetate (CAS: 1214910-61-8) is used in the pharm...

1214910-61-8Ethyl 2-(2-bromo-5-f...
Compound Q&A

How is 4-Methyl-2-benzofuran-1,3-dione (CAS: 4792-30-7) typically synthesized?

4-Methyl-2-benzofuran-1,3-dione (CAS: 4792-30-7) can be synthesized through seve...

4792-30-74-Methyl-2-benzofura...
Compound Q&A

What industries use 4,6-Dichloroquinoline-3-carbonitrile (CAS: 936498-04-3)?

4,6-Dichloroquinoline-3-carbonitrile (CAS: 936498-04-3) is used in the pharmaceu...

936498-04-34,6-Dichloroquinolin...
Compound Q&A

What are the main uses of Chloro[tris(para-trifluoromethylphenyl)phosphine]gold(I) (CAS: 385815-83-8)?

Chloro[tris(para-trifluoromethylphenyl)phosphine]gold(I) is primarily used in or...

385815-83-8Chloro[tris(para-tri...
Compound Q&A

Is 2-Bromo-5-nitrofuran (CAS: 823-73-4) safe?

2-Bromo-5-nitrofuran (CAS: 823-73-4) is generally considered safe when handled w...

823-73-42-Bromo-5-nitrofuran
Compound Q&A

How should 5-Bromo-2,3,4-trifluorobenzoic acid (CAS: 212631-85-1) be stored?

5-Bromo-2,3,4-trifluorobenzoic acid should be stored in a cool, dry place away f...

212631-85-15-Bromo-2,3,4-triflu...
Compound Q&A

What are the main uses of Zinc bis(aminoacetate) (CAS: 7214-08-6)?

Zinc bis(aminoacetate) (CAS: 7214-08-6) is primarily used in the pharmaceutical ...

7214-08-6Zinc bis(aminoacetat...
Compound Q&A

How should Adamantan-1-ylmethanol (CAS: 770-71-8) be stored?

Adamantan-1-ylmethanol should be stored in a cool, dry, and well-ventilated plac...

770-71-8Adamantan-1-ylmethan...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.