Transient low-barrier hydrogen bond in the photoactive state of green fluorescent protein

Literature Information

Publication Date 2015-04-24
DOI 10.1039/C5CP01067E
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Marc Nadal-Ferret, Ricard Gelabert, Miquel Moreno


View Original

Abstract

In this paper, we have analyzed the feasibility of spontaneous proton transfer in GFP at the Franck–Condon region directly after photoexcitation. Computation of a sizeable portion of the potential energy surface at the Franck–Condon region of the A structure shows the process of proton transfer to be unfavorable by 3 kcal mol−1 in S1 if no further structural relaxation is permitted. The ground vibrational state is found to lie above the potential energy barrier of the proton transfer in both S0 and S1. Expectation values of the geometry reveal that the proton shared between the chromophore and W22, and the proton shared between Ser205 and Glu222 are very close to the center of the respective hydrogen bonds, giving support to the claim that the first transient intermediate detected after photoexcitation (I0*) has characteristics similar to those of a low-barrier hydrogen bond [Di Donato et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 13, 16295]. A quantum dynamical calculation of the evolution in the excited state shows an even larger probability of finding those two protons close to the center compared to in the ground state, but no formation of the proton-transferred product is observed. A QM/MM photoactive state geometry optimization, initiated using a configuration obtained by taking the A minimum and moving the protons to the product side, yields a minimum energy structure with the protons transferred and in which the His148 residue is substantially closer to the now anionic chromophore. These results indicate that: (1) proton transfer is not possible if structural relaxation of the surroundings of the chromophore is prevented; (2) protons H1 and H3 especially are found very close to the point halfway between the donor and acceptor after photoexcitation when the zero-point energy is considered; (3) a geometrical parameter exists (the His148–Cro distance) under which the structure with the protons transferred is not a minimum, and that, if included, should lead to the fluorescing I* structure. The existence of an oscillating stationary state between the reactants and products of the triple proton transfer reaction can explain the dual emission reported for the I0* intermediate of wtGFP.

Related Literature

Back cover

Front/Back Matter

DOI: 10.1039/B603775P

Laser photolysis study on the reaction of nitrate radical with tributylphosphate and its analogues—comparison with sulfate radical

Hui He, Mingzhang Lin, Yusa Muroya, Hisaaki Kudo, Yosuke Katsumura

2004-02-10 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B315913B

Investigation of interparticle interactions of larger (4.63 nm) monolayer protected gold clusters during quantized double layer charging

Nirmalya Kumar Chaki, Bhalchandra Kakade, Kunjukrishna Pillai Vijayamohanan, Poonam Singh, C. V. Dharmadhikari

2006-03-07 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B516650K

Hydration and structure—the two sides of the insulin aggregation process

Wojciech Dzwolak, Revanur Ravindra, Roland Winter

2004-02-10 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B314086E

Modeling fluid diffusion using the lattice density functional theory approach: counterdiffusion in an external field

Daniel Matuszak, Gregory L. Aranovich, Marc D. Donohue

2006-02-23 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B516036G

Phase and rheological behaviour of viscoelastic wormlike micellar solutions formed in mixed nonionic surfactant systems

Durga P. Acharya, Md. Khalid Hossain, Jin-Feng, Takaya Sakai, Hironobu Kunieda

2003-12-19 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B312940C

Front cover

Cover

DOI: 10.1039/B603770B

Exactly solvable approximating models for Rabi Hamiltonian dynamics

Andrey Pereverzev, Eric R. Bittner

2006-02-14 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B517470H

You might also like

Compound Q&A

Is 6-(3-Fluorophenyl)picolinic acid (CAS: 887982-40-3) safe?

6-(3-Fluorophenyl)picolinic acid is generally considered safe for laboratory use...

887982-40-36-(3-Fluorophenyl)pi...
Compound Q&A

What industries use (3R)-3-Pyrrolidinol (CAS: 2799-21-5)?

(3R)-3-Pyrrolidinol is used in the pharmaceutical industry as a precursor for dr...

2799-21-5(3R)-3-Pyrrolidinol
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling (4R,5R)-4,5-Diethoxycarbonyl-2,2-dimethyldioxolane (CAS: 59779-75-8)?

When handling (4R,5R)-4,5-Diethoxycarbonyl-2,2-dimethyldioxolane (CAS: 59779-75-...

59779-75-8(4R,5R)-4,5-Diethoxy...
Compound Q&A

How is 1-(6-Chloroimidazo[1,2-b]pyridazin-3-yl)ethanone (CAS: 90734-71-7) typically synthesized?

1-(6-Chloroimidazo[1,2-b]pyridazin-3-yl)ethanone is often synthesized via a mult...

90734-71-71-(6-Chloroimidazo[1...
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for N-Ethyl-3,4-dimethylbenzylamine (CAS: 39180-83-1)?

The market for N-Ethyl-3,4-dimethylbenzylamine (CAS: 39180-83-1) remains steady,...

39180-83-1N-Ethyl-3,4-dimethyl...
Compound Q&A

What is Tert-butyl 3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)azetidine-1-carboxylate (CAS: 1019008-21-9)?

Tert-butyl 3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)azetidine-1-carboxylate is a chemical compound wit...

1019008-21-9Tert-butyl 3-(pyrrol...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 1-Bromo-3-chloro-2,4-dimethoxybenzene (CAS: 1228956-93-1)?

1-Bromo-3-chloro-2,4-dimethoxybenzene (CAS: 1228956-93-1) falls under the classi...

1228956-93-11-Bromo-3-chloro-2,4...
Compound Q&A

Is 8-Bromo-2-methyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-1(2H)-one (CAS: 1368622-07-4) safe?

The safety of 8-Bromo-2-methyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinolin-1(2H)-one (CAS: 1368622-07...

1368622-07-48-Bromo-2-methyl-3,4...
Compound Q&A

Is Benzyl [(3S)-2,6-dioxo-3-piperidinyl]carbamate (CAS: 22785-43-9) safe?

Benzyl [(3S)-2,6-dioxo-3-piperidinyl]carbamate is generally safe when handled wi...

22785-43-9Benzyl [(3S)-2,6-dio...
Compound Q&A

How should 1-{[4-(4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)phenyl]sulfonyl}pyrrolidine (CAS: 928657-21-0) be stored?

1-{[4-(4,4,5,5-Tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)phenyl]sulfonyl}pyrrolidine s...

928657-21-01-{[4-(4,4,5,5-Tetra...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.