Effect of surface chemical composition on the surface potential and iso-electric point of silicon substrates modified with self-assembled monolayers

Literature Information

Publication Date 2011-02-14
DOI 10.1039/C0CP02615H
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Che-Hung Kuo, Hsun-Yun Chang, Chi-Ping Liu, Szu-Hsian Lee, Yun-Wen You


View Original

Abstract

Self-assembled monolayer (SAM)-modified nano-materials are a new technology to deliver drug molecules. While the majority of these depend on covalently immobilizing molecules on the surface, it is proposed that electrostatic interactions may be used to deliver drugs. By tuning the surface potential of solid substrates with SAMs, drug molecules could be either absorbed on or desorbed from substrates through the difference in electrostatic interactions around the selected iso-electric point (IEP). In this work, the surface of silicon substrates was tailored with various ratios of 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS) and 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (MPTMS), which form amine- and thiol-bearing SAMs, respectively. The ratio of the functional groups on the silicon surface was quantified by X-ray photoelectron spectrometry (XPS); in general, the deposition kinetics of APTMS were found to be faster than those of MPTMS. Furthermore, for solutions with high MPTMS concentrations, the relative deposition rate of APTMS increased dramatically due to the acid–base reaction in the solution and subsequent electrostatic interactions between the molecules and the substrate. The zeta potential in aqueous electrolytes was determined with an electro-kinetic analyzer. By depositing SAMs of binary functional groups in varied ratios, the surface potential and IEP of silicon substrates could be fine-tuned. For <50% amine concentration in SAMs, the IEP changed linearly with the chemical composition from <2 to 7.18. For higher amine concentrations, the IEP slowly increased with concentration to 7.94 because the formation of hydrogen-bonding suppressed the subsequent protonation of amines.

Related Literature

Screening out unfeasible hypothetical zeolite structures via the closest non-adjacent O⋯O pairs

Junran Lu, Lin Li, Hongxiao Cao, Yi Li, Jihong Yu

2016-12-06 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP06217B

Double electron–electron resonance with multiple non-selective chirp refocusing

Andrin Doll, Gunnar Jeschke

2016-12-08 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP07262C

Observation of partial reduction of manganese in the lithium rich layered oxides, 0.4Li2MnO3–0.6LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2, during the first charge

Hyung Cheoul Shim, Donghan Kim, Dongwook Shin, Seungmin Hyun, Chang-Su Woo, Taehwan Yu, Jae-Pyoung Ahn

2016-12-02 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP07574F

N-ethyl-N-methylpyrrolidinium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide-electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride composite electrolytes: characterization and lithium cell studies

Yundong Zhou, Xiaoen Wang, Haijin Zhu, Michel Armand, Maria Forsyth, George W. Greene, Jennifer M. Pringle, Patrick C. Howlett

2016-12-19 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP07415D

The impact of the structuring of hydrotropes in water on the mesoscale solubilisation of a third hydrophobic component

Thomas Buchecker, Sebastian Krickl, Robert Winkler, Isabelle Grillo, Pierre Bauduin, Didier Touraud, Arno Pfitzner, Werner Kunz

2016-11-30 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP06696H

Inside front cover

Cover

DOI: 10.1039/C7CP90002C

Small-angle scattering from the Cantor surface fractal on the plane and the Koch snowflake

Vladimir A. Osipov

2016-12-14 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP07496K

Electronic properties of layered phosphorus heterostructures

Ruge Quhe, Shenyan Feng, Ming Lei

2016-12-02 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP06583J

Freestanding MoO2/Mo2C imbedded carbon fibers for Li-ion batteries

Hongqin Li, Haijun Ye, Zheng Xu, Chuanyi Wang, Jiao Yin

2016-12-15 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP07569J

The strongest CO binding and the highest C–O stretching frequency

Ranajit Saha, Sudip Pan, Gernot Frenking, Pratim K. Chattaraj, Gabriel Merino

2016-12-14 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP06824C

You might also like

Compound Q&A

Is 2-(2-chloroacetamido)-3-phenylpropanoic acid (CAS: 7765-11-9) safe?

2-(2-Chloroacetamido)-3-phenylpropanoic acid (CAS: 7765-11-9) is generally consi...

7765-11-92-(2-chloroacetamido...
Compound Q&A

Is 2-(Benzyloxy)-5-bromobenzoic acid (CAS: 62176-31-2) safe?

2-(Benzyloxy)-5-bromobenzoic acid can be handled safely if appropriate precautio...

62176-31-22-(Benzyloxy)-5-brom...
Compound Q&A

What is (4-Methyl-1,2,5-oxadiazol-3-yl)methanamine hydrochloride (CAS: 1159825-48-5)?

(4-Methyl-1,2,5-oxadiazol-3-yl)methanamine hydrochloride is a chemical compound ...

1159825-48-5(4-Methyl-1,2,5-oxad...
Compound Q&A

What is 2-(5-Hexylthiophen-2-yl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (CAS: 917985-54-7)?

2-(5-Hexylthiophen-2-yl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (CAS: 917985-54...

917985-54-72-(5-Hexylthiophen-2...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to 4-(8-Methyl-9H-1,3-dioxolo[4,5-h][2,3]benzodiazepin-5-yl)benzenamine (CAS: 102771-26-6) in synthesis?

While 4-(8-Methyl-9H-1,3-dioxolo[4,5-h][2,3]benzodiazepin-5-yl)benzenamine (CAS:...

102771-26-64-(8-Methyl-9H-1,3-d...
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for tert-butyl 3-hydroxy-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro-2H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]azepine-6-carboxylate (CAS: 851376-80-2)?

The market for tert-butyl 3-hydroxy-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro-2H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]azepine...

851376-80-2tert-butyl 3-hydroxy...
Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 3,5-Diamino-1H-pyrazole-4-carbonitrile (CAS: 6844-58-2) be handled?

Waste containing 3,5-Diamino-1H-pyrazole-4-carbonitrile (CAS: 6844-58-2) should ...

6844-58-23,5-Diamino-1H-pyraz...
Compound Q&A

How is (6-Fluoro-3-pyridinyl)boronic acid (CAS: 351019-18-6) typically synthesized?

(6-Fluoro-3-pyridinyl)boronic acid can be synthesized through the reaction of 6-...

351019-18-6(6-Fluoro-3-pyridiny...
Compound Q&A

What industries use Dibenzyl carbonimidoylbiscarbamate (CAS: 10065-79-9)?

Dibenzyl carbonimidoylbiscarbamate (CAS: 10065-79-9) finds applications in vario...

10065-79-9Dibenzyl carbonimido...
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for (beta,beta,2,3,4,5,6-~2~H_7_)Phenylalanine (CAS: 74228-83-4)?

The market for (beta,beta,2,3,4,5,6-~2~H_7_)Phenylalanine (CAS: 74228-83-4) is g...

74228-83-4(beta,beta,2,3,4,5,6...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.