The competitive adsorption of counter-ions at the surface of anionic surfactants solution

Literature Information

Publication Date 2010-12-23
DOI 10.1039/C0CP01600D
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Harald Morgner


View Original

Abstract

We have determined the surface excess of surface active anion and counter-ions in a non-aqueous polar solution of anionic surfactants blends, as well as their distributions near the solution surface. The blends of two anionic surfactants, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and cesium dodecyl sulfate (CDS), with different contents were used as solutes to prepare the solutions. According to the isotherms that are separately fitted to the pure SDS and the pure CDS solutions (C. Wang and H. Morgner, Langmuir, 2010, 26, 3121), CDS has a slightly but significantly higher surface excess than SDS (CDS is 14.8% higher) at the concentration of 0.04 molal kg−1solvent. Therefore, in this work we chose 0.04 molal kg−1solvent as total anion concentration and varied the contents of surfactants. From present experimental results, we found that the surface excess of anion increases slightly with the CDS in the bulk content. Importantly, the fractions of Cs+ in cationic surface excess are higher than its contents in the bulk for all three solutions. This demonstrates that Cs+ is more competitive than Na+ in the adsorption. The surface structure of the solutions have been characterized by concentration-depth profiles, of Cs+, Na+ and of sulfur which is used to identify dodecyl sulfate. Those profiles evidence that Cs ions penetrate deeper than sodium ions into the layer formed by the heads of the anions, reducing the electrical potential of the surface more efficiently. This can be used to explain the adsorption competition between those two counter-ions. The cause that makes Cs+ more competitive than Na+ in the adsorption can be attributed to its less tightly bound solvation shell, and thus, to its effectively smaller ion size.

Related Literature

Rational design of model Pd(ii)-catalysts for C–H activation involving ligands with charge-shift bonding characteristics

Dongxia Ma, Congjie Zhang, Zhe-Ning Chen, Xin Xu

2016-12-08 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP06215F

The strongest CO binding and the highest C–O stretching frequency

Ranajit Saha, Sudip Pan, Gernot Frenking, Pratim K. Chattaraj, Gabriel Merino

2016-12-14 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP06824C

Interfacial water on organic substrates at cryogenic temperatures: hydrogen bonding and quantification in the submonolayer regime

D. Houdoux, J. Houplin, L. Amiaud, A. Lafosse, C. Dablemont

2017-01-05 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP03328H

Electrochemical polypyrrole formation from pyrrole ‘adlayer’

Deivis Plausinaitis, Linas Sinkevicius, Lina Mikoliunaite, Valentina Plausinaitiene, Almira Ramanaviciene

2016-11-22 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP06545G

Luminophores of tunable colors from ternary Ag–In–S and quaternary Ag–In–Zn–S nanocrystals covering the visible to near-infrared spectral range

Grzegorz Gabka, Piotr Bujak, Kamil Kotwica, Andrzej Ostrowski, Wojciech Lisowski, Janusz W. Sobczak, Adam Pron

2016-12-02 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP07008F

Water-tunable solvatochromic and nanoaggregate fluorescence: dual colour visualisation and quantification of trace water in tetrahydrofuran

Masaru Tanioka, Atsuya Muranaka, Yoshinao Shirasaki, Yousuke Ooyama, Masashi Ueda

2016-11-11 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP06808A

Interfacial assembly structures and nanotribological properties of saccharic acids

Hongyu Shi, Yuhong Liu, Qingdao Zeng, Yanlian Yang, Chen Wang, Xinchun Lu

2016-11-29 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP06759J

Structural influence of proteins upon adsorption to MoS2 nanomaterials: comparison of MoS2 force field parameters

Zonglin Gu, Phil De Luna, Zaixing Yang

2016-12-15 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP05260F

You might also like

Compound Q&A

Is 2-(2-chloroacetamido)-3-phenylpropanoic acid (CAS: 7765-11-9) safe?

2-(2-Chloroacetamido)-3-phenylpropanoic acid (CAS: 7765-11-9) is generally consi...

7765-11-92-(2-chloroacetamido...
Compound Q&A

Is 2-(Benzyloxy)-5-bromobenzoic acid (CAS: 62176-31-2) safe?

2-(Benzyloxy)-5-bromobenzoic acid can be handled safely if appropriate precautio...

62176-31-22-(Benzyloxy)-5-brom...
Compound Q&A

What is (4-Methyl-1,2,5-oxadiazol-3-yl)methanamine hydrochloride (CAS: 1159825-48-5)?

(4-Methyl-1,2,5-oxadiazol-3-yl)methanamine hydrochloride is a chemical compound ...

1159825-48-5(4-Methyl-1,2,5-oxad...
Compound Q&A

What is 2-(5-Hexylthiophen-2-yl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (CAS: 917985-54-7)?

2-(5-Hexylthiophen-2-yl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (CAS: 917985-54...

917985-54-72-(5-Hexylthiophen-2...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to 4-(8-Methyl-9H-1,3-dioxolo[4,5-h][2,3]benzodiazepin-5-yl)benzenamine (CAS: 102771-26-6) in synthesis?

While 4-(8-Methyl-9H-1,3-dioxolo[4,5-h][2,3]benzodiazepin-5-yl)benzenamine (CAS:...

102771-26-64-(8-Methyl-9H-1,3-d...
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for tert-butyl 3-hydroxy-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro-2H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]azepine-6-carboxylate (CAS: 851376-80-2)?

The market for tert-butyl 3-hydroxy-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro-2H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]azepine...

851376-80-2tert-butyl 3-hydroxy...
Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 3,5-Diamino-1H-pyrazole-4-carbonitrile (CAS: 6844-58-2) be handled?

Waste containing 3,5-Diamino-1H-pyrazole-4-carbonitrile (CAS: 6844-58-2) should ...

6844-58-23,5-Diamino-1H-pyraz...
Compound Q&A

How is (6-Fluoro-3-pyridinyl)boronic acid (CAS: 351019-18-6) typically synthesized?

(6-Fluoro-3-pyridinyl)boronic acid can be synthesized through the reaction of 6-...

351019-18-6(6-Fluoro-3-pyridiny...
Compound Q&A

What industries use Dibenzyl carbonimidoylbiscarbamate (CAS: 10065-79-9)?

Dibenzyl carbonimidoylbiscarbamate (CAS: 10065-79-9) finds applications in vario...

10065-79-9Dibenzyl carbonimido...
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for (beta,beta,2,3,4,5,6-~2~H_7_)Phenylalanine (CAS: 74228-83-4)?

The market for (beta,beta,2,3,4,5,6-~2~H_7_)Phenylalanine (CAS: 74228-83-4) is g...

74228-83-4(beta,beta,2,3,4,5,6...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.