Development and test of highly accurate endpoint free energy methods. 3: partition coefficient prediction using a Poisson–Boltzmann method combined with a solvent accessible surface area model for SAMPL challenges

Literature Information

Publication Date 2023-11-21
DOI 10.1039/D3CP04174C
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Taoyu Niu, Xibing He, Fengyang Han, Luxuan Wang, Junmei Wang


View Original

Abstract

Accurately predicting solvation free energy is the key to predict protein–ligand binding free energy. In addition, the partition coefficient (log P), which is an important physicochemical property that determines the distribution of a drug in vivo, can be derived directly from transfer free energies, i.e., the difference between solvation free energies (SFEs) in different solvents. Within the Statistical Assessment of the Modeling of Proteins and Ligands (SAMPL) 9 challenge, we applied the Poisson–Boltzmann (PB) surface area (SA) approach to predict the toluene/water transfer free energy and partition coefficient (log Ptoluene/water) from SFEs. For each solute, only a single conformation automatically generated by the free software Open Babel was used. The PB calculation directly adopts our previously optimized boundary definition – a set of general AMBER force field 2 (GAFF2) atom-type based sphere radii for solute atoms. For the non-polar SA model, we newly developed the solvent-related molecular surface tension parameters γ and offset b for toluene and cyclohexane targeting experimental SFEs. This approach yielded the highest predictive accuracy in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.52 kcal mol−1 in transfer free energy for 16 small drug molecules among all 18 submissions in the SAMPL9 blind prediction challenge. The re-evaluation of the challenge set using multi-conformation strategies based on molecular dynamics (MD) simulations further reduces the prediction RMSE to 1.33 kcal mol−1. At the same time, an additional evaluation of our PBSA method on the SAMPL5 cyclohexane/water distribution coefficient (log Dcyclohexane/water) prediction revealed that our model outperformed COSMO-RS, the best submission model with RMSEPBSA = 1.88 versus RMSECOSMO-RS = 2.11 log units. Two external log Ptoluene/water and log Pcyclohexane/water datasets that contain 110 and 87 data points, respectively, are collected for extra validation and provide an in-depth insight into the error source of the PBSA method.

Related Literature

An automatic integrated microfluidic system for allergy microarray chips‡

Wen-Yen Huang, Shang-Ta Chou, Chia-Hui Chen, Shan-Ying Chou, Jia-Han Wu, Yu-Chen Chen

2018-03-27 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C8AN00247A

A homogeneous electrochemical sensor for Hg2+ determination in environmental water based on the T–Hg2+–T structure and exonuclease III-assisted recycling amplification

Hao Yu, Lingshan Su, Chang Liu, Yanling Song, Shaoyun Wang, Zhenyu Lin, Fang Chen

2018-03-29 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C8AN00462E

Frequency division multiplex HPLC-MS for simultaneous analyses

Hiroka Kishi, Takashi Kumazaki, Shinya Kitagawa, Hajime Ohtani

2019-03-11 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C8AN02352B

An implanted pH sensor read using radiography

Md. Arifuzzaman, Paul W. Millhouse, Yash Raval, Thomas B. Pace, Shayesteh Beladi Behbahani, John D. DesJardins, Tzuen-Rong J. Tzeng

2019-03-19 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C8AN02337A

A new functional membrane protein microarray based on tethered phospholipid bilayers

Ofelia Maniti, Christophe Marquette, Bruno Tillier, Sandra Cortès, Agnès Girard-Egrot

2018-03-28 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C8AN00260F

Label-free density-based detection of adipocytes of bone marrow origin using magnetic levitation

Oyku Sarigil, Muge Anil-Inevi, Esra Yilmaz, Gulistan Mese, H. Cumhur Tekin, Engin Ozcivici

2019-03-11 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C8AN02503G

You might also like

Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling lithium chloride hydrate (1:1:1) (CAS: 16712-20-2)?

When handling lithium chloride hydrate (1:1:1) (CAS: 16712-20-2), it is importan...

16712-20-2Lithium chloride hyd...
Compound Q&A

Is 4-(4H-1,2,4-Triazol-4-yl)piperidine (CAS: 690261-92-8) safe?

4-(4H-1,2,4-Triazol-4-yl)piperidine is generally considered safe for use in phar...

690261-92-84-(4H-1,2,4-Triazol-...
Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 1,3-Thiazole-2-carboxamide (CAS: 16733-85-0) be handled?

Waste containing 1,3-Thiazole-2-carboxamide (CAS: 16733-85-0) should be collecte...

16733-85-01,3-Thiazole-2-carbo...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 5-(Difluoromethyl)-2-fluorobenzonitrile (CAS: 934175-58-3)?

5-(Difluoromethyl)-2-fluorobenzonitrile (CAS: 934175-58-3) is subject to regulat...

934175-58-35-(Difluoromethyl)-2...
Compound Q&A

How is Methyl 3-acetamido-2-thiophenecarboxylate (CAS: 22288-79-5) typically synthesized?

Methyl 3-acetamido-2-thiophenecarboxylate can be synthesized by the reaction of ...

22288-79-5Methyl 3-acetamido-2...
Compound Q&A

What is 4-Isoquinolinecarbonitrile (CAS: 34846-65-6)?

4-Isoquinolinecarbonitrile is a chemical compound with the CAS number 34846-65-6...

34846-65-64-Isoquinolinecarbon...
Compound Q&A

How should Methyl 1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (CAS: 877309-59-6) be stored?

Store Methyl 1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (CAS: 877309-59-6) in a cool, dry p...

877309-59-6Methyl 1H-1,2,3-tria...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 6-Bromo[1,3]thiazolo[5,4-b]pyridin-2-amine (CAS: 1160791-13-8)?

6-Bromo[1,3]thiazolo[5,4-b]pyridin-2-amine (CAS: 1160791-13-8) is subject to the...

1160791-13-86-Bromo[1,3]thiazolo...
Compound Q&A

Is (2S,3S)-2-Ammonio-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-hydroxypropanoate (CAS: 23651-95-8) safe?

(2S,3S)-2-Ammonio-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-hydroxypropanoate (CAS: 23651-95-8) ...

23651-95-8(2S,3S)-2-Ammonio-3-...
Compound Q&A

What are the physical and chemical properties of 7-bromo-3-methyl-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-4-one (CAS: 1293987-84-4)?

7-Bromo-3-methyl-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-4-one is a solid with a crystalline form....

1293987-84-47-bromo-3-methyl-3,4...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.