The importance of charge redistribution during electrochemical reactions: a density functional theory study of silver orthophosphate (Ag3PO4)

Literature Information

Publication Date 2019-04-17
DOI 10.1039/C8CP07684G
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Xi Cao, Rochan Sinha, Shuxia Tao


View Original

Abstract

The structural sensitivity of silver orthophosphate (Ag3PO4) for photo-electrochemical water oxidation on (100), (110) and (111) surfaces has recently been reported by experimental studies (D. J. Martin et al., Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 3380–3386). The (111) surface showed the highest performance with an oxygen evolution rate of 10 times higher than the other surfaces. The high performance of the (111) surface was attributed to high hole mobility, high surface energy and, in a recent theoretical study (Z. Ma et al., RSC Adv., 2017, 7, 23994–24003), to a lower OH adsorption energy and the band structure. The investigations are based on a few structures and a full atomistic picture of the Ag3PO4 under electrochemical reactions is still missing. Therefore, we report here a systematic study of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) of Ag3PO4 (100), (110), and (111) surfaces by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Through a detailed investigation of the reaction energies and the overpotentials of OER on all possible surface orientations with all possible terminations and different involvement of Ag adsorption sites, we can confirm that (111) surfaces are highly active. However, surface orientation was not found to exclusively determine the electrochemical activity; neither did the number of Ag atoms involved in the adsorption of the intermediate species nor the type of surface termination or the different potential determining reaction steps. By using Bader charge analysis and investigation of the charge redistribution during OER, we found that the highest activity, i.e. lowest overpotential, is related to the charge redistribution of two OER steps, namely the Oad and the HOOad formation. If the charge redistribution between these steps is small, then the overpotential is small and, hence, the activity is high. Charge redistributions are usually small for the (111) surface and therefore the (111) surface is usually the most active one. The concept of charge redistribution being decisive for the high activity of Ag3PO4 may open a new design strategy for materials with highly efficient electrochemical surfaces.

Related Literature

Selective fluorometric detection of pyrophosphate by interaction with alizarin red S–dimethyltin(iv) complex

Raul Villamil-Ramos, Anatoly K. Yatsimirsky

2011-01-13 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/C0CC05346E

Inside front cover

Cover

DOI: 10.1039/C8CS90062K

Smartphone-based optical analysis systems

Sarah Di Nonno, Roland Ulber

2021-03-31 Critical Review

DOI: 10.1039/D1AN00025J

Polycyclic aromatic azomethine ylides: a unique entry to extended polycyclic heteroaromatics

Reinhard Berger, Manfred Wagner, Klaus Müllen

2014-10-22 Edge Article

DOI: 10.1039/C4SC02793K

Multilayer structured AgNW/WPU-MXene fiber strain sensors with ultrahigh sensitivity and a wide operating range for wearable monitoring and healthcare

Jun-Hong Pu, Xing Zhao, Xiang-Jun Zha, Lu Bai, Kai Ke, Rui-Ying Bao, Zheng-Ying Liu, Ming-Bo Yang, Wei Yang

2019-06-03 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C9TA04352G

The synthesis, chain-packing simulation and long-term gas permeability of highly selective spirobifluorene-based polymers of intrinsic microporosity

C. Grazia Bezzu, Mariolino Carta, Maria-Chiara Ferrari, Johannes C. Jansen, Marcello Monteleone, Elisa Esposito, Alessio Fuoco, Kyle Hart, T. P. Liyana-Arachchi, Coray M. Colina, Neil B. McKeown

2018-05-23 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C8TA02601G

Droplet-based blood group antibody screening with laser incubation

Clare A. Manderson, Heather McLiesh, Rico F. Tabor, Gil Garnier

2021-03-02 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D0AN01993C

You might also like

Compound Q&A

How is Ethyl 4-chlorothieno[2,3-b]pyridine-5-carboxylate (CAS: 59713-58-5) typically synthesized?

Ethyl 4-chlorothieno[2,3-b]pyridine-5-carboxylate (CAS: 59713-58-5) can be synth...

59713-58-5Ethyl 4-chlorothieno...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 5-Methyl-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde (CAS: 52562-50-2)?

5-Methyl-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde (CAS: 52562-50-2) is subject to various regula...

52562-50-25-Methyl-1H-indole-3...
Compound Q&A

What are the physical and chemical properties of (1,3-Dimethyl-2,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-5-pyrimidinyl)boronic acid (CAS: 223418-73-3)?

(1,3-Dimethyl-2,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-5-pyrimidinyl)boronic acid is a white...

223418-73-3(1,3-Dimethyl-2,4-di...
Compound Q&A

How should waste containing Sulfocostunolide A (CAS: 1016983-51-9) be handled?

Waste containing Sulfocostunolide A (CAS: 1016983-51-9) should be handled with c...

1016983-51-9Sulfocostunolide A
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling Murraxocin (CAS: 88478-44-8)?

When handling Murraxocin (CAS: 88478-44-8), ensure proper personal protective eq...

88478-44-8Murraxocin
Compound Q&A

What are the physical and chemical properties of Formvar (CAS: 63148-64-1)?

Formvar (CAS: 63148-64-1) is an alkyd resin characterized by a high molecular we...

63148-64-1Formvar(R)
Compound Q&A

Is (S)-4-benzyl-2-((benzyloxy)methyl)morpholine (CAS: 205242-66-6) safe?

(S)-4-benzyl-2-((benzyloxy)methyl)morpholine is generally safe when handled with...

205242-66-6(S)-4-benzyl-2-((ben...
Compound Q&A

What industries use Methyl 1-(5-bromo-2-pyrimidinyl)cyclopropanecarboxylate (CAS: 1447607-69-3)?

Methyl 1-(5-bromo-2-pyrimidinyl)cyclopropanecarboxylate (CAS: 1447607-69-3) is p...

1447607-69-3Methyl 1-(5-bromo-2-...
Compound Q&A

Is 2-Methyl-1-phenyl-1-propanamine hydrochloride (CAS: 24290-47-9) safe?

2-Methyl-1-phenyl-1-propanamine hydrochloride (CAS: 24290-47-9) is generally con...

24290-47-92-Methyl-1-phenyl-1-...
Compound Q&A

How is 3-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-methylpropanoic acid (CAS: 66735-01-1) typically synthesized?

3-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-methylpropanoic acid is synthesized through a multi-step pro...

66735-01-13-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.