Solvent effects on the NMR shieldings of stacked DNA base pairs

Literature Information

Publication Date 2022-07-13
DOI 10.1039/D2CP00398H
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors


View Original

Abstract

Stacking effects are among the most important effects in DNA. We have recently studied their influence in fragments of DNA through the analysis of NMR magnetic shieldings, firstly in vacuo. As a continuation of this line of research we show here the influence of solvent effects on the shieldings through the application of both explicit and implicit models. We found that the explicit solvent model is more appropriate for consideration due to the results matching better in general with experiments, as well as providing clear knowledge of the electronic origin of the value of the shieldings. Our study is grounded on a recently developed theoretical model of our own, by which we are able to learn about the magnetic effects of given fragments of DNA molecules on selected base pairs. We use the shieldings of the atoms of a central base pair (guanine–cytosine) of a selected fragment of DNA molecules as descriptors of physical effects, like π-stacking and solvent effects. They can be taken separately and altogether. The effect of π-stacking is introduced through the addition of some pairs above and below of the central base pair, and now, the solvent effect is considered including a network of water molecules that consist of two solvation layers, which were fixed in the calculations performed in all fragments. We show that the solvent effects enhance the stacking effects on the magnetic shieldings of atoms that belong to the external N–H bonds. The net effect is of deshielding on both atoms. There is also a deshielding effect on the carbon atoms that belong to CO bonds, for which the oxygen atom has an explicit hydrogen bond (HB) with a solvent water molecule. Solvent effects are found to be no higher than a few percent of the total value of the shieldings (between 1% and 5%) for most atoms, although there are few for which such an effect can be higher. There is one nitrogen atom, the acceptor of the HB between guanine and cytosine, that is more highly shielded (around 15 ppm or 10%) when the explicit solvent is considered. In a similar manner, the most external nitrogen atom of cytosine and the hydrogen atom that is bonded to it are highly deshielded (around 10 ppm for nitrogen and around 3 ppm for hydrogen).

Related Literature

Controlling micro-phase separation in semi-crystalline/amorphous conjugated block copolymers

Lianshan Li, Zhiyuan Tian, Zhiyong Tang

2014-05-21 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/C4PY00498A

Switch on/off microcapsules for controllable photosensitive drug release in a ‘release-cease-recommence’ mode

Hang Lin, Wang Xiao, Si-Yong Qin, Si-Xue Cheng, Xian-Zheng Zhang

2014-05-15 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/C4PY00564C

Front cover

Cover

DOI: 10.1039/C4PY90043J

Synthesis and properties of a rod-g-rod bottlebrush with a semirigid mesogen-jacketed polymer as the side chain

Hai-Jian Tian, Wei Qu, Yu-Feng Zhu, Zhihao Shen, Xing-He Fan

2014-04-22 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C4PY00033A

From glycidyl carbonate to hydroxyurethane side-groups in alternating fluorinated copolymers

Roukaya Hamiye, Ali Alaaeddine, Mouhamad Awada, Benjamin Campagne, Sylvain Caillol, Sophie M. Guillaume, Bruno Ameduri, Jean-François Carpentier

2014-05-09 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C4PY00547C

Synthesis and phase behavior of a new 2-vinylbiphenyl-based mesogen-jacketed liquid crystalline polymer with a high glass transition temperature and low threshold molecular weight

Qi-Kai Zhang, Hai-Jian Tian, Yu-Feng Zhu, Yongri Liang, Zhihao Shen, Xing-He Fan

2014-03-11 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C3PY01755A

Nano-building block based-hybrid organic–inorganic copolymers with self-healing properties

A. Guinault, S. Delalande

2014-04-03 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C4PY00172A

You might also like

Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling lithium chloride hydrate (1:1:1) (CAS: 16712-20-2)?

When handling lithium chloride hydrate (1:1:1) (CAS: 16712-20-2), it is importan...

16712-20-2Lithium chloride hyd...
Compound Q&A

Is 4-(4H-1,2,4-Triazol-4-yl)piperidine (CAS: 690261-92-8) safe?

4-(4H-1,2,4-Triazol-4-yl)piperidine is generally considered safe for use in phar...

690261-92-84-(4H-1,2,4-Triazol-...
Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 1,3-Thiazole-2-carboxamide (CAS: 16733-85-0) be handled?

Waste containing 1,3-Thiazole-2-carboxamide (CAS: 16733-85-0) should be collecte...

16733-85-01,3-Thiazole-2-carbo...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 5-(Difluoromethyl)-2-fluorobenzonitrile (CAS: 934175-58-3)?

5-(Difluoromethyl)-2-fluorobenzonitrile (CAS: 934175-58-3) is subject to regulat...

934175-58-35-(Difluoromethyl)-2...
Compound Q&A

How is Methyl 3-acetamido-2-thiophenecarboxylate (CAS: 22288-79-5) typically synthesized?

Methyl 3-acetamido-2-thiophenecarboxylate can be synthesized by the reaction of ...

22288-79-5Methyl 3-acetamido-2...
Compound Q&A

What is 4-Isoquinolinecarbonitrile (CAS: 34846-65-6)?

4-Isoquinolinecarbonitrile is a chemical compound with the CAS number 34846-65-6...

34846-65-64-Isoquinolinecarbon...
Compound Q&A

How should Methyl 1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (CAS: 877309-59-6) be stored?

Store Methyl 1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (CAS: 877309-59-6) in a cool, dry p...

877309-59-6Methyl 1H-1,2,3-tria...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 6-Bromo[1,3]thiazolo[5,4-b]pyridin-2-amine (CAS: 1160791-13-8)?

6-Bromo[1,3]thiazolo[5,4-b]pyridin-2-amine (CAS: 1160791-13-8) is subject to the...

1160791-13-86-Bromo[1,3]thiazolo...
Compound Q&A

Is (2S,3S)-2-Ammonio-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-hydroxypropanoate (CAS: 23651-95-8) safe?

(2S,3S)-2-Ammonio-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-hydroxypropanoate (CAS: 23651-95-8) ...

23651-95-8(2S,3S)-2-Ammonio-3-...
Compound Q&A

What are the physical and chemical properties of 7-bromo-3-methyl-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-4-one (CAS: 1293987-84-4)?

7-Bromo-3-methyl-3,4-dihydroquinazolin-4-one is a solid with a crystalline form....

1293987-84-47-bromo-3-methyl-3,4...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.