The quantitative impact of fluid vs. solid interfaces on the catalytic performance of pickering emulsions

Literature Information

Publication Date 2020-12-16
DOI 10.1039/D0CP06030E
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors

Sebastian Stock, Annika Schlander, Maresa Kempin, Ramsia Geisler, Dmitrij Stehl, Kai Spanheimer, Nicole Hondow, Stuart Micklethwaite, Ariane Weber, Reinhard Schomäcker, Anja Drews, Markus Gallei, Regine von Klitzing


View Original

Abstract

Pickering emulsions (PEs), i.e. particle stabilized emulsions, are used as reaction environments in biphasic catalysis for the hydroformylation of 1-dodecene into tridecanal using the catalyst rhodium (Rh)–sulfoxantphos (SX). The present study connects the knowledge about particle–catalyst interactions and PE structure with the reaction results. It quantifies the efficiency of the catalytic performance of the catalyst localized in the voids between the particles (liquid–liquid interface) and the catalyst adsorbed on the particle surface (liquid–solid interface) using a new numerical approach. First, it is ensured that the overall packing density and geometry at the droplet interface and the size of the water droplets of the resulting w/o PEs are predictable. Second, it is shown that approximately all particles assemble at the droplet surface after emulsion preparation and neither the packing parameter nor the droplet size change with the particle surface charge or size when the total particle cross section is kept constant. Third, studies on the influence of the catalyst on the emulsion structure reveal that irrespective of the particle charge the surface active and negatively charged catalyst Rh–SX reduces the PE droplet size significantly and decreases the particle packing parameter from s = 0.91 (hexagonal packing in 2D) to s = 0.69 (shattered structure). In this latter case, large voids of the free w/o interface form and become covered with the catalyst. With a deep knowledge about the PE structure the reaction efficiencies of the liquid–liquid vs. the solid–liquid interface are quantified. By excluding any other influence factors, it is shown that the activity of the catalyst is the same at the fluid and solid interface and the performance of the reaction is explained by the geometry of the system. After the reaction, the catalyst retention via membrane filtration is shown to be successfully achieved without damaging the emulsions. This enables the continuous recovery of the catalyst, i.e. the most expensive compound in PE-based catalytic reactions, being a crucial criterion for industrial applications.

Related Literature

Geometric self-sorting in DNA self-assembly

Yu He, Ye Tian, Yi Chen, Alexander E. Ribbe, Chengde Mao

2006-10-24 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B611984K

Separation distance dependent fluorescence enhancement of fluorescein isothiocyanate by silver nanoparticles

Daming Cheng, Qing-Hua Xu

2006-11-14 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B612401A

A remote valency control technique: catalytic reduction of uranium(vi) to uranium(iv) by external ultrasound irradiation

Takashi Toraishi, Takaumi Kimura, Makoto Arisaka

2006-11-23 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B611573J

Back matter

Front/Back Matter

DOI: 10.1039/B700283C

Synthesis of Cp*CH2PPh2 and its use as a ligand for the nickel-catalysed cross-coupling reaction of alkyl halides with aryl Grignard reagents

Minoru Uemura, Hideki Yorimitsu, Koichiro Oshima

2006-09-28 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B612173J

Extensive spectral tuning of the proton transfer emission from 550 to 675 nm via a rational derivatization of 10-hydroxybenzo[h]quinoline

Kew-Yu Chen, Cheng-Chih Hsieh, Yi-Ming Cheng, Chin-Hung Lai, Pi-Tai Chou

2006-09-15 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B610274C

Back matter

Front/Back Matter

DOI: 10.1039/B615387A

Vancomycin-induced morphological transformation of self-assembled amphiphilic diacetylene supramolecules

Kun Ha Park, Ji-Seok Lee, Hyunwook Park, Eun-Hye Oh, Jong-Man Kim

2006-12-06 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/B615626F

Back cover

Front/Back Matter

DOI: 10.1039/B618390P

You might also like

Compound Q&A

How is Ethyl 4-chlorothieno[2,3-b]pyridine-5-carboxylate (CAS: 59713-58-5) typically synthesized?

Ethyl 4-chlorothieno[2,3-b]pyridine-5-carboxylate (CAS: 59713-58-5) can be synth...

59713-58-5Ethyl 4-chlorothieno...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 5-Methyl-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde (CAS: 52562-50-2)?

5-Methyl-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde (CAS: 52562-50-2) is subject to various regula...

52562-50-25-Methyl-1H-indole-3...
Compound Q&A

What are the physical and chemical properties of (1,3-Dimethyl-2,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-5-pyrimidinyl)boronic acid (CAS: 223418-73-3)?

(1,3-Dimethyl-2,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-5-pyrimidinyl)boronic acid is a white...

223418-73-3(1,3-Dimethyl-2,4-di...
Compound Q&A

How should waste containing Sulfocostunolide A (CAS: 1016983-51-9) be handled?

Waste containing Sulfocostunolide A (CAS: 1016983-51-9) should be handled with c...

1016983-51-9Sulfocostunolide A
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling Murraxocin (CAS: 88478-44-8)?

When handling Murraxocin (CAS: 88478-44-8), ensure proper personal protective eq...

88478-44-8Murraxocin
Compound Q&A

What are the physical and chemical properties of Formvar (CAS: 63148-64-1)?

Formvar (CAS: 63148-64-1) is an alkyd resin characterized by a high molecular we...

63148-64-1Formvar(R)
Compound Q&A

Is (S)-4-benzyl-2-((benzyloxy)methyl)morpholine (CAS: 205242-66-6) safe?

(S)-4-benzyl-2-((benzyloxy)methyl)morpholine is generally safe when handled with...

205242-66-6(S)-4-benzyl-2-((ben...
Compound Q&A

What industries use Methyl 1-(5-bromo-2-pyrimidinyl)cyclopropanecarboxylate (CAS: 1447607-69-3)?

Methyl 1-(5-bromo-2-pyrimidinyl)cyclopropanecarboxylate (CAS: 1447607-69-3) is p...

1447607-69-3Methyl 1-(5-bromo-2-...
Compound Q&A

Is 2-Methyl-1-phenyl-1-propanamine hydrochloride (CAS: 24290-47-9) safe?

2-Methyl-1-phenyl-1-propanamine hydrochloride (CAS: 24290-47-9) is generally con...

24290-47-92-Methyl-1-phenyl-1-...
Compound Q&A

How is 3-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-methylpropanoic acid (CAS: 66735-01-1) typically synthesized?

3-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-methylpropanoic acid is synthesized through a multi-step pro...

66735-01-13-(4-Bromophenyl)-2-...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.