Coupled metal partitioning dynamics and toxicodynamics at biointerfaces: a theory beyond the biotic ligand model framework

Literature Information

Publication Date 2016-03-01
DOI 10.1039/C5CP07780J
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors


View Original

Abstract

A mechanistic understanding of the processes governing metal toxicity to microorganisms (bacteria, algae) calls for an adequate formulation of metal partitioning at biointerfaces during cell exposure. This includes the account of metal transport dynamics from bulk solution to biomembrane and the kinetics of metal internalisation, both potentially controlling the intracellular and surface metal fractions that originate cell growth inhibition. A theoretical rationale is developed here for such coupled toxicodynamics and interfacial metal partitioning dynamics under non-complexing medium conditions with integration of the defining cell electrostatic properties. The formalism explicitly considers intertwined metal adsorption at the biointerface, intracellular metal excretion, cell growth and metal depletion from bulk solution. The theory is derived under relevant steady-state metal transport conditions on the basis of coupled Nernst–Planck equation and continuous logistic equation modified to include metal-induced cell growth inhibition and cell size changes. Computational examples are discussed to identify limitations of the classical Biotic Ligand Model (BLM) in evaluating metal toxicity over time. In particular, BLM is shown to severely underestimate metal toxicity depending on cell exposure time, metal internalisation kinetics, cell surface electrostatics and initial cell density. Analytical expressions are provided for the interfacial metal concentration profiles in the limit where cell-growth is completely inhibited. A rigorous relationship between time-dependent cell density and metal concentrations at the biosurface and in bulk solution is further provided, which unifies previous equations formulated by Best and Duval under constant cell density and cell size conditions. The theory is sufficiently flexible to adapt to toxicity scenarios with involved cell survival-death processes.

Related Literature

Mechanism and kinetics of the electrocatalytic reaction responsible for the high cost of hydrogen fuel cells

Tao Cheng, William A Goddard, III, Qi An, Hai Xiao, Boris Merinov, Sergey Morozov

2016-12-21 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP08055C

The shortest Th–Th distance from a new type of quadruple bond

Han-Shi Hu, Nikolas Kaltsoyannis

2017-01-10 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C7CP00113D

Ethane C–H bond activation on the Fe(iv)–oxo species in a Zn-based cluster of metal–organic frameworks: a density functional theory study

Sarawoot Impeng, Siwarut Siwaipram, Sareeya Bureekaew, Michael Probst

2017-01-09 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP07771D

Low intensity, continuous wave photodoping of ZnO quantum dots – photon energy and particle size effects

Matías E. Aguirre, S. Municoy, M. A. Grela, A. J. Colussi

2017-01-04 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP06829D

WO3/W:BiVO4/BiVO4 graded photoabsorber electrode for enhanced photoelectrocatalytic solar light driven water oxidation

Junghyun Choi, Pitchaimuthu Sudhagar, Joo Hyun Kim, Jiseok Kwon, Jeonghyun Kim, Chiaki Terashima, Akira Fujishima, Taeseup Song, Ungyu Paik

2017-01-09 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP08199A

Computational prediction of high thermoelectric performance in p-type half-Heusler compounds with low band effective mass

Teng Fang, Shuqi Zheng, Tian Zhou, Lei Yan, Peng Zhang

2017-01-09 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP07897D

Molecular aggregation of naphthalimide organic semiconductors assisted by amphiphilic and lipophilic interactions: a joint theoretical and experimental study

I. Arrechea-Marcos, M. J. Mancheño, M. C. Ruiz Delgado, M. M. Ramos, J. A. Quintana, J. M. Villalvilla, M. A. Díaz-García, J. T. López Navarrete, R. Ponce Ortiz, J. L. Segura

2017-02-03 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C6CP06819G

Inside front cover

Cover

DOI: 10.1039/C7CP90017A

You might also like

Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling 4-(2-Furylmethyl)thiomorpholine 1,1-dioxide (CAS: 79206-94-3)?

When handling 4-(2-Furylmethyl)thiomorpholine 1,1-dioxide (CAS: 79206-94-3), it ...

79206-94-34-(2-Furylmethyl)thi...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling 4-Chloro-N-[2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl]benzamide (CAS: 71320-77-9)?

When handling 4-Chloro-N-[2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl]benzamide (CAS: 71320-77-9), it...

71320-77-94-Chloro-N-[2-(4-mor...
Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 2-[2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethyl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate (CAS: 62921-74-8) be handled?

Waste containing this compound (CAS: 62921-74-8) should be handled according to ...

62921-74-82-[2-(2-Methoxyethox...
Compound Q&A

How should waste containing (S)-Methyl 2-amino-3-cyclohexylpropanoate be handled?

Waste containing (S)-Methyl 2-amino-3-cyclohexylpropanoate should be collected i...

40056-18-6(S)-Methyl 2-amino-3...
166882-70-85-({4-[(2S,4R)-4-Hyd...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to (2E)-3-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)acrylic acid (CAS: 7312-27-8) in synthesis?

There are several alternatives to (2E)-3-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)acrylic acid in syn...

7312-27-8(2E)-3-(3,4-Dichloro...
Compound Q&A

How should Ethyl 6-(2-nitrophenyl)imidazo[2,1-b][1,3]thiazole-3-carboxylate (CAS: 925437-84-9) be stored?

Ethyl 6-(2-nitrophenyl)imidazo[2,1-b][1,3]thiazole-3-carboxylate (CAS: 925437-84...

925437-84-9Ethyl 6-(2-nitrophen...
Compound Q&A

How should waste containing 2-(1,3-Thiazol-2-yl)ethanamine (CAS: 18453-07-1) be handled?

Waste containing 2-(1,3-Thiazol-2-yl)ethanamine (CAS: 18453-07-1) should be coll...

18453-07-12-(1,3-Thiazol-2-yl)...
Compound Q&A

How is Methyl 5-iodo-2-methylbenzoate (CAS: 103440-54-6) typically synthesized?

Methyl 5-iodo-2-methylbenzoate can be synthesized through the iodination of meth...

103440-54-6Methyl 5-iodo-2-meth...
Compound Q&A

How is 5-Chloro[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine (CAS: 1427399-34-5) typically synthesized?

5-Chloro[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine is commonly synthesized via the condensat...

1427399-34-55-Chloro[1,2,4]triaz...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.