Quantum control by means of Hamiltonian structure manipulation

Literature Information

Publication Date 2011-03-22
DOI 10.1039/C0CP02234A
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors


View Original

Abstract

A traditional quantum optimal control experiment begins with a specific physical system and seeks an optimal time-dependent field to steer the evolution towards a target observable value. In a more general framework, the Hamiltonian structure may also be manipulated when the material or molecular ‘stockroom’ is accessible as a part of the controls. The current work takes a step in this direction by considering the converse of the normal perspective to now start with a specific fixed field and employ the system's time-independent Hamiltonian structure as the control to identify an optimal form. The Hamiltonian structure control variables are taken as the system energies and transition dipole matrix elements. An analysis is presented of the Hamiltonian structure control landscape, defined by the observable as a function of the Hamiltonian structure. A proof of system controllability is provided, showing the existence of a Hamiltonian structure that yields an arbitrary unitary transformation when working with virtually any field. The landscape analysis shows that there are no suboptimal traps (i.e., local extrema) for controllable quantum systems when unconstrained structural controls are utilized to optimize a state-to-state transition probability. This analysis is corroborated by numerical simulations on model multilevel systems. The search effort to reach the top of the Hamiltonian structure landscape is found to be nearly invariant to system dimension. A control mechanism analysis is performed, showing a wide variety of behavior for different systems at the top of the Hamiltonian structure landscape. It is also shown that reducing the number of available Hamiltonian structure controls, thus constraining the system, does not always prevent reaching the landscape top. The results from this work lay a foundation for considering the laboratory implementation of optimal Hamiltonian structure manipulation for seeking the best control performance, especially with limited electromagnetic resources.

Related Literature

Electronic couplings for molecular charge transfer: benchmarking CDFT, FODFT and FODFTB against high-level ab initio calculations. II

Adam Kubas, Fruzsina Gajdos, Harald Oberhofer, Jochen Blumberger

2014-12-22 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C4CP04749D

Phonon-assisted energy back transfer-induced multicolor upconversion emission of Gd2O3:Yb3+/Er3+ nanoparticles under near-infrared excitation

Jun Liu, Huawei Deng, Zhanyun Huang, Yueli Zhang, Dihu Chen, Yuanzhi Shao

2015-05-05 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C5CP01632K

Ab initio study of the O4H+ novel species: spectroscopic fingerprints to aid its observation

F. George D. Xavier, Rámon Hernández-Lamoneda

2015-05-12 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C5CP01822F

Understanding the role of the dye/oxide interface via SnO2-based MK-2 dye-sensitized solar cells

Dae-Yong Son, Chang-Ryul Lee, Hee-Won Shin, In-Hyuk Jang, Hyun Suk Jung, Tae Kyu Ahn

2015-05-06 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C5CP01816A

Enhanced photocurrent density of hematite thin films on FTO substrates: effect of post-annealing temperature

Eun Soo Cho, Myung Jong Kang, Young Soo Kang

2015-05-26 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C5CP01823D

Plasmon-enhanced homogeneous and heterogeneous triplet–triplet annihilation by gold nanoparticles

Xian Cao, Bo Hu, Rui Ding, Peng Zhang

2015-05-12 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/C5CP01876E

Molecular functionalization of silicene/Ag(111) by covalent bonds: a DFT study

Régis Stephan, Marie-Christine Hanf, Philippe Sonnet

2015-03-25 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C5CP00613A

Aggregation-induced preparation of ultrastable zinc sulfide colloidal nanospheres and their photocatalytic degradation of multiple organic dyes

Wanting Yang, Xiaoli Liu, Dong Li, Louzhen Fan, Yunchao Li

2015-04-27 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C5CP01831E

Understanding the role of iron in the magnetism of Fe doped ZnO nanoparticles

C. A. Barrero, A. Punnoose

2015-05-01 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C5CP01408E

You might also like

Compound Q&A

How should 2-Methylbenzene-1,4-diamine dihydrochloride (CAS: 615-45-2) be stored?

2-Methylbenzene-1,4-diamine dihydrochloride (CAS: 615-45-2) should be stored in ...

615-45-22-Methylbenzene-1,4-...
Compound Q&A

Is (1S,4S)-2,5-Diazabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane dihydrobromide (CAS: 132747-20-7) safe?

(1S,4S)-2,5-Diazabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane dihydrobromide is generally considered sa...

132747-20-7(1S,4S)-2,5-Diazabic...
Compound Q&A

What industries use (6-Chloropyridazin-3-YL)methanamine (CAS: 871826-15-2)?

(6-Chloropyridazin-3-YL)methanamine finds applications in the pharmaceutical ind...

871826-15-2(6-Chloropyridazin-3...
Compound Q&A

What are the main uses of 2-Fluoro-3-methylphenol (CAS: 77772-72-6)?

2-Fluoro-3-methylphenol is primarily used in the synthesis of pharmaceuticals, p...

77772-72-62-Fluoro-3-methylphe...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling 3-Methoxy-4-nitrobenzonitrile (CAS: 177476-75-4)?

When handling 3-Methoxy-4-nitrobenzonitrile, it is important to wear appropriate...

177476-75-43-Methoxy-4-nitroben...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling 1,3-Oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine-2(3H)-thione (CAS: 211949-57-4)?

When handling 1,3-Oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridine-2(3H)-thione (CAS: 211949-57-4), it is ...

211949-57-4[1,3]Oxazolo[4,5-b]p...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 4-Ethynylbenzamide (CAS: 90347-86-7)?

4-Ethynylbenzamide (CAS: 90347-86-7) falls under various regulatory guidelines i...

90347-86-74-Ethynylbenzamide
Compound Q&A

What are the main uses of 3-(2-Ethylphenyl)-2-thioxo-4-imidazolidinone (CAS: 186822-57-1)?

3-(2-Ethylphenyl)-2-thioxo-4-imidazolidinone is primarily used as an intermediat...

186822-57-13-(2-Ethylphenyl)-2-...
Compound Q&A

What is (2-Fluoro-6-methoxyphenyl)acetic acid (CAS: 500912-19-6)?

(2-Fluoro-6-methoxyphenyl)acetic acid, also known as 4-fluoro-3-methoxybenzoic a...

500912-19-6(2-Fluoro-6-methoxyp...
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for 2-[4-(Hydroxymethyl)phenoxy]ethanol (CAS: 102196-18-9)?

Market trends for 2-[4-(Hydroxymethyl)phenoxy]ethanol (CAS: 102196-18-9) indicat...

102196-18-92-[4-(Hydroxymethyl)...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.