Techno-economic assessment and carbon footprint of processes for the large-scale production of oxymethylene dimethyl ethers from carbon dioxide and hydrogen

Literature Information

Publication Date 2021-11-15
DOI 10.1039/D1SE01270C
Impact Factor 6.367
Authors

Franz Mantei, Ramy E. Ali, Cornelie Baensch, Simon Voelker, Philipp Haltenort, Jakob Burger, Ralph-Uwe Dietrich, Niklas von der Assen, Achim Schaadt, Jörg Sauer, Ouda Salem


View Original

Abstract

Poly(oxymethylene)dimethyl ethers (OME) show promising fuel properties, enabling their use in existing infrastructure, especially as alternatives or additives to diesel fuel, leading to a significant reduction in local emissions (e.g., soot and NOx). Additionally, OME can be produced from methanol, enabling their production based on a renewable feedstock, which can significantly reduce the carbon footprint in comparison to fossil fuels. However, an industrial process to sustainably produce OME on a large-scale has not been developed to date. Based on the results of detailed simulations in Aspen Plus®, this work compares the most promising process routes for the production of OME3–5 in a system boundary including H2via water electrolysis and captured CO2 from point sources or ultimately using direct air capture technologies. One of the main outcomes of this work is the standardized methodology introduced for the techno-economic and CO2 footprint evaluation and comparison of the diverse processes. The comparison criteria are based on systematic approaches covering process materials and energy efficiency, technology readiness level, costs, and the carbon footprint. The process routes based on anhydrous formaldehyde and methanol or methylal feedstock show higher energy efficiencies and lower carbon footprints than other routes considering the commercial aqueous formaldehyde. However, the synthesis of anhydrous formaldehyde is under research and development and not yet industrially established. Importantly, considering the net production costs of OME3–5 from the four simulated process routes, there is no significant difference, which is attributed to the rather high share of the operational cost, and specifically the cost of the H2 and CO2 feedstock. Using sensitivity analysis, the influence of feedstock costs and carbon footprint on the evaluation criteria is identified, elaborating the potential of feasible and sustainable OME production under favourable conditions.

Related Literature

Charge doping and electric field tunable ferromagnetism and Curie temperature of the MnS2 monolayer

Jing Xie, Dongni Wu, Yangfang Liao, Xiaolong Cao, Shiyou Zhou

2023-11-14 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3CP04382G

Growth methods' effect on the physical characteristics of CsPbBr3 single crystal

Mohamed Ben Bechir, Faisal Alresheedi

2023-12-05 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3CP04645A

Predicting nearest neighbor free energies of modified RNA with LIE: results for pseudouridine and N1-methylpseudouridine within RNA duplexes

Nivedita Dutta, Joanna Sarzynska, Indrajit Deb, Ansuman Lahiri

2023-11-24 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3CP02442C

Unraveling the effect of particle size of active metals in Ni/MgO on methane activation and carbon growth mechanism

Shengzhuo Chen, Juntian Niu, Xianrong Zheng, Haiyu Liu, Yan Jin, Jingyu Ran

2023-12-15 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3CP05435G

Understanding the “Berg limit”: the 65° contact angle as the universal adhesion threshold of biomatter

Matej Kanduč, Emanuel Schneck, Roland R. Netz

2023-12-12 Perspective

DOI: 10.1039/D3CP05084J

Designing idealised devices for bias-free solar water splitting

Jaemin Park, Dukjoon Kim, Jung Kyu Kim

2023-12-26 Perspective

DOI: 10.1039/D3SE01371E

Observation of the possible magnetic correction above the Curie temperature in Cr2Si2Te6 single crystals

Yan Sun, Zhongzhu Jiang, Yang Li, Lanxin Liu, Hui Liang, Yiyan Wang, Dandan Wu, Na Li, Ying Zhou, Qiuju Li, Xiaoyu Yue, Wei Tong, Xuan Luo, Jianghe Lan, Xuefeng Sun

2023-11-28 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/D3CP03854H

You might also like

Compound Q&A

How should waste containing N-Methoxy-N-methyl-1,3-thiazole-5-carboxamide (CAS: 898825-89-3) be handled?

Waste containing N-Methoxy-N-methyl-1,3-thiazole-5-carboxamide (CAS: 898825-89-3...

898825-89-3N-Methoxy-N-methyl-1...
Compound Q&A

How should N-(4-Biphenylyl)dibenzo[b,d]furan-4-amine (CAS: 1318338-47-4) be stored?

N-(4-Biphenylyl)dibenzo[b,d]furan-4-amine should be stored in a tightly sealed c...

1318338-47-4N-(4-Biphenylyl)dibe...
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for 3-Acetamido-5-amino-2,4,6-triiodobenzoic acid (CAS: 1713-07-1)?

The market for 3-Acetamido-5-amino-2,4,6-triiodobenzoic acid (CAS: 1713-07-1) is...

1713-07-13-Acetamido-5-amino-...
Compound Q&A

How should Benzyl 2-O-acetyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside (CAS: 61820-03-9) be stored?

Benzyl 2-O-acetyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside (CAS: 61820-03-9) ...

61820-03-9Benzyl 2-O-acetyl-3,...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 2-Ethylpiperazine dihydrochloride (CAS: 438050-52-3)?

2-Ethylpiperazine dihydrochloride (CAS: 438050-52-3) is regulated under the Glob...

438050-52-32-Ethylpiperazine di...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 1,1'-[1,3-Phenylenebis(methylene)]bis(3-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione) (CAS: 119462-56-5)?

1,1'-[1,3-Phenylenebis(methylene)]bis(3-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione) (CAS: 11946...

119462-56-51,1'-[1,3-Phenyleneb...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to 5-Fluoro-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)pyridine (CAS: 1287217-79-1) in synthesis?

Several alternatives can be used in the synthesis of 5-Fluoro-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)...

1287217-79-15-Fluoro-2-(1-pyrrol...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling 6-Bromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-8-amine (CAS: 676371-00-9)?

When handling 6-Bromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-8-amine, it is important to wear appr...

676371-00-96-Bromoimidazo[1,2-a...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to (2S,4R)-4-(4-Nitrobenzyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid hydrochloride (CAS: 1049740-22-8) in synthesis?

Alternatives to (2S,4R)-4-(4-Nitrobenzyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid hydrochlo...

1049740-22-8(2S,4R)-4-(4-Nitrobe...
Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.