Computational approaches to dissociative chemisorption on metals: towards chemical accuracy

Literature Information

Publication Date 2021-03-30
DOI 10.1039/D1CP00044F
Impact Factor 3.676
Authors


View Original

Abstract

We review the state-of-the-art in the theory of dissociative chemisorption (DC) of small gas phase molecules on metal surfaces, which is important to modeling heterogeneous catalysis for practical reasons, and for achieving an understanding of the wealth of experimental information that exists for this topic, for fundamental reasons. We first give a quick overview of the experimental state of the field. Turning to the theory, we address the challenge that barrier heights (Eb, which are not observables) for DC on metals cannot yet be calculated with chemical accuracy, although embedded correlated wave function theory and diffusion Monte-Carlo are moving in this direction. For benchmarking, at present chemically accurate Eb can only be derived from dynamics calculations based on a semi-empirically derived density functional (DF), by computing a sticking curve and demonstrating that it is shifted from the curve measured in a supersonic beam experiment by no more than 1 kcal mol−1. The approach capable of delivering this accuracy is called the specific reaction parameter (SRP) approach to density functional theory (DFT). SRP-DFT relies on DFT and on dynamics calculations, which are most efficiently performed if a potential energy surface (PES) is available. We therefore present a brief review of the DFs that now exist, also considering their performance on databases for Eb for gas phase reactions and DC on metals, and for adsorption to metals. We also consider expressions for SRP-DFs and briefly discuss other electronic structure methods that have addressed the interaction of molecules with metal surfaces. An overview is presented of dynamical models, which make a distinction as to whether or not, and which dissipative channels are modeled, the dissipative channels being surface phonons and electronically non-adiabatic channels such as electron–hole pair excitation. We also discuss the dynamical methods that have been used, such as the quasi-classical trajectory method and quantum dynamical methods like the time-dependent wave packet method and the reaction path Hamiltonian method. Limits on the accuracy of these methods are discussed for DC of diatomic and polyatomic molecules on metal surfaces, paying particular attention to reduced dimensionality approximations that still have to be invoked in wave packet calculations on polyatomic molecules like CH4. We also address the accuracy of fitting methods, such as recent machine learning methods (like neural network methods) and the corrugation reducing procedure. In discussing the calculation of observables we emphasize the importance of modeling the properties of the supersonic beams in simulating the sticking probability curves measured in the associated experiments. We show that chemically accurate barrier heights have now been extracted for DC in 11 molecule–metal surface systems, some of which form the most accurate core of the only existing database of Eb for DC reactions on metal surfaces (SBH10). The SRP-DFs (or candidate SRP-DFs) that have been derived show transferability in many cases, i.e., they have been shown also to yield chemically accurate Eb for chemically related systems. This can in principle be exploited in simulating rates of catalyzed reactions on nano-particles containing facets and edges, as SRP-DFs may be transferable among systems in which a molecule dissociates on low index and stepped surfaces of the same metal. In many instances SRP-DFs have allowed important conclusions regarding the mechanisms underlying observed experimental trends. An important recent observation is that SRP-DFT based on semi-local exchange DFs has so far only been successful for systems for which the difference of the metal work function and the molecule's electron affinity exceeds 7 eV. A main challenge to SRP-DFT is to extend its applicability to the other systems, which involve a range of important DC reactions of e.g. O2, H2O, NH3, CO2, and CH3OH. Recent calculations employing a PES based on a screened hybrid exchange functional suggest that the road to success may be based on using exchange functionals of this category.

Related Literature

Elucidation of consistent enantioselectivity for a homologous series of chiral compounds in homochiral metal–organic frameworks

Xiaoying Bao, Linda J. Broadbelt, Randall Q. Snurr

2010-05-24 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C000809E

Label-free RNA aptamer-based capacitive biosensor for the detection of C-reactive protein

Anjum Qureshi, Yasar Gurbuz, Saravan Kallempudi, Javed H. Niazi

2010-07-20 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C004133E

Conformational selection or induced fit for Brinker and DNA recognition

Fang Qin, Yaobin Jiang, Yue Chen, Maoying Wu, Guanwen Yan, Wenjun Ye, Yixue Li, Jian Zhang

2010-11-18 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C0CP00701C

Hierarchical anatase TiO2 porous nanopillars with high crystallinity and controlled length: an effective candidate for dye-sensitized solar-cells

Yang Qu, Wei Zhou, Kai Pan, Chungui Tian, Zhiyu Ren, Youzhen Dong, Honggang Fu

2010-07-09 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B922658C

A kinetic study on the conversion of cis-2-butene with deuterium on a Pd/Fe3O4 model catalyst

Wiebke Ludwig, Aditya Savara, Björn Brandt, Swetlana Schauermann

2010-11-12 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C0CP00078G

Electrical conductivity in patterned silver–mesoporous titania nanocomposite thin films: towards robust 3D nano-electrodes

Eduardo D. Martínez, Leticia Granja, Martín G. Bellino, Galo J. A. A. Soler-Illia

2010-10-01 Communication

DOI: 10.1039/C0CP00824A

Photoinduced tautomeric transformations of xanthurenic acid

Vadim V. Yanshole, Peter S. Sherin, Nina P. Gritsan, Olga A. Snytnikova, Victor I. Mamatyuk, Jakob Grilj, Eric Vauthey, Renad Z. Sagdeev, Yuri P. Tsentalovich

2010-07-08 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/C000735H

Ionic liquids and solids with paramagnetic anions‡

James F. Wishart

2010-06-18 Paper

DOI: 10.1039/B920652N

Contents

Front/Back Matter

DOI: 10.1039/C0CP90064H

You might also like

Compound Q&A

How should waste containing N-Methoxy-N-methyl-1,3-thiazole-5-carboxamide (CAS: 898825-89-3) be handled?

Waste containing N-Methoxy-N-methyl-1,3-thiazole-5-carboxamide (CAS: 898825-89-3...

898825-89-3N-Methoxy-N-methyl-1...
Compound Q&A

How should N-(4-Biphenylyl)dibenzo[b,d]furan-4-amine (CAS: 1318338-47-4) be stored?

N-(4-Biphenylyl)dibenzo[b,d]furan-4-amine should be stored in a tightly sealed c...

1318338-47-4N-(4-Biphenylyl)dibe...
Compound Q&A

What is the market or research trend for 3-Acetamido-5-amino-2,4,6-triiodobenzoic acid (CAS: 1713-07-1)?

The market for 3-Acetamido-5-amino-2,4,6-triiodobenzoic acid (CAS: 1713-07-1) is...

1713-07-13-Acetamido-5-amino-...
Compound Q&A

How should Benzyl 2-O-acetyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside (CAS: 61820-03-9) be stored?

Benzyl 2-O-acetyl-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside (CAS: 61820-03-9) ...

61820-03-9Benzyl 2-O-acetyl-3,...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 2-Ethylpiperazine dihydrochloride (CAS: 438050-52-3)?

2-Ethylpiperazine dihydrochloride (CAS: 438050-52-3) is regulated under the Glob...

438050-52-32-Ethylpiperazine di...
Compound Q&A

What regulatory guidelines apply to 1,1'-[1,3-Phenylenebis(methylene)]bis(3-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione) (CAS: 119462-56-5)?

1,1'-[1,3-Phenylenebis(methylene)]bis(3-methyl-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione) (CAS: 11946...

119462-56-51,1'-[1,3-Phenyleneb...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to 5-Fluoro-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)pyridine (CAS: 1287217-79-1) in synthesis?

Several alternatives can be used in the synthesis of 5-Fluoro-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)...

1287217-79-15-Fluoro-2-(1-pyrrol...
Compound Q&A

What precautions should be taken when handling 6-Bromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-8-amine (CAS: 676371-00-9)?

When handling 6-Bromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin-8-amine, it is important to wear appr...

676371-00-96-Bromoimidazo[1,2-a...
Compound Q&A

Are there alternatives to (2S,4R)-4-(4-Nitrobenzyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid hydrochloride (CAS: 1049740-22-8) in synthesis?

Alternatives to (2S,4R)-4-(4-Nitrobenzyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid hydrochlo...

1049740-22-8(2S,4R)-4-(4-Nitrobe...

Source Journal

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
CiteScore: 5.5
Self-citation Rate: 10.3%
Articles per Year: 3036

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.

Recommended Compounds

Recommended Suppliers

Disclaimer
This page provides academic journal information for reference and research purposes only. We are not affiliated with any journal publishers and do not handle publication submissions. For publication-related inquiries, please contact the respective journal publishers directly.
If you notice any inaccuracies in the information displayed, please contact us at support@chemtradehub.com. We will promptly review and address your concerns.